Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[RFC 120] The section on transaction input is missing and has inaccuracies #43

Closed
stringhandler opened this issue Nov 9, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #25
Closed

[RFC 120] The section on transaction input is missing and has inaccuracies #43

stringhandler opened this issue Nov 9, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #25

Comments

@stringhandler
Copy link
Collaborator

Under blocks

* each [transaction input](https://rfc.tari.com/Glossary.html#transaction) MUST:

  * spend an existing valid [UTXO](https://rfc.tari.com/Glossary.html#unspent-transaction-outputs)
 * have a maturity greater than the current block height
  * be in a canonical order (see [Transaction ordering](https://rfc.tari.com/RFC-0120_Consensus.html#transaction-ordering)

The maturity check should surely be in the output section.

There are checks done on Tariscript that are missing
@SWvheerden
Copy link
Contributor

#25 addresses these

@stringhandler stringhandler mentioned this issue Nov 9, 2022
Merged
@stringhandler stringhandler linked a pull request Nov 9, 2022 that will close this issue
docs: move RFC_0120 to stable #25
Merged
@CjS77 CjS77 closed this as completed in #25 Nov 15, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

docs: move RFC_0120 to stable SWvheerden/rfcs
2 participants
@SWvheerden @stringhandler