Select apps that will move to TasteLang #499

Closed
addyosmani opened this Issue Mar 22, 2013 · 11 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
3 participants
Owner

addyosmani commented Mar 22, 2013

As part of our evolution to TasteJS, we're going to migrate compile to JS apps over to TasteLang, a sub-project which will allow us to scale up inclusion of those types of apps without having to say no so often to combo apps (e.g Angular + CoffeeScript).

This issue is to track which apps we want to move. Please feel free to list your selections :)

Member

passy commented Mar 22, 2013

The easy way would be to say everything that isn't written in JavaScript, but that would include Spine.js too. Do we want to be more fine-grained and case-to-case or make it easy to decide?

Owner

addyosmani commented Mar 22, 2013

It's the harder choice to make, but I think that a clean split where we say if it isn't JS it has to go into TodoLang makes sense.

Member

passy commented Mar 22, 2013

+1 on that. We should make sure they're still easily discoverable. That would make it

  • Spine
  • GWT
  • TS + Angular
  • TS + Backbone
  • Serenade.js
  • Dart
  • Closure
  • Batman.js

Updated:

  • Knockback
  • Derby
  • Chaplin-Brunch

I hope I didn't miss anything.

Owner

addyosmani commented Mar 22, 2013

Thanks for checking!. We also need to decide on the strategy for apps currently in progress/PRs - do we ask authors to resubmit to TasteLang or just manually copy them over and ensure attribution?.

Probably a good idea for us to label these PRs either way (e.g TasteLang)

Owner

sindresorhus commented Mar 23, 2013

@addyosmani git subtree split ;) It preserves attribution. I did it on all the generators when I extracted them. I can do it when we've decided on what apps to move.

@imcotton imcotton referenced this issue Mar 27, 2013

Closed

Add CoffeeScript + AngularJS example #496

9 of 14 tasks complete
Owner

addyosmani commented Apr 2, 2013

Should we consider apps for thus that we previously punted on in the wiki? There probably aren't that many now that I think about it.

Member

passy commented Apr 2, 2013

@addyosmani Looks like this would only affect the Meteor + CoffeeScript example, but maybe there are some PRs that didn't make it to the wiki. I'll look that up soon.

Owner

addyosmani commented Apr 12, 2013

We should start to think about when we want to make this move and how we want to represent apps that have been transferred over to the other repo. If we can figure out how to visualize this on the homepage, the move can probably start to happen soon. Do we want to just have another block/section where we link to these or introduce tabs/separate pages?

Owner

sindresorhus commented Apr 12, 2013

I would like to see it equal to TodoMVC.

            TasteJS.com
                |
                v
  todomvc.com       tastejs.com/tasteapp

We can just use the existing layout. I'll come up with some stuff soon.

Owner

addyosmani commented Apr 12, 2013

I like it!

Member

passy commented Apr 12, 2013

+1

@sindresorhus sindresorhus referenced this issue in tastejs/TasteLang Sep 7, 2013

Open

Move apps over #1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment