refactor(cta): use commander instead of minimst

[amrbashir]

What kind of change does this PR introduce? (check at least one)

• Bugfix
• Feature
• Docs
• New Binding Issue #___
• Code style update
• Refactor
• Build-related changes
• Other, please describe:

Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (check one)

• Yes. Issue #___
• No

The PR fulfills these requirements:

• When resolving a specific issue, it's referenced in the PR's title (e.g. fix: #xxx[,#xxx], where "xxx" is the issue number)
• A change file is added if any packages will require a version bump due to this PR per the instructions in the readme.

If adding a new feature, the PR's description includes:

• A convincing reason for adding this feature (to avoid wasting your time, it's best to open a suggestion issue first and wait for approval before working on it)

Other information:

commander is more robust than minimst, two main features I appreciate is:

1. auto-generated help messages (kinda)
2. validation of values passed to options

[amrbashir]

alright, checks have passed, I guess this PR is ready to go

[nothingismagick]

I will approve this, but would really like to recommend that you take the time to fill out the template of the PR and give non-informed readers (aka those not reading every channel on discord) justification for replacing functionality. This is also useful for posterity.

[amrbashir]

yeah that's totally my bad, I think I forgot

[amrbashir]

I marked this as a draft as I think I still need to do some changes to this PR before merge.

[amrbashir]

alright this is ready, but probably need to be merged after the audit as it introduces a new dependency.