feat(cta): add SolidJS recipe

[davedbase]

What kind of change does this PR introduce? (check at least one)

• Bugfix
• Feature
• Docs
• New Binding Issue #___
• Code style update
• Refactor
• Build-related changes
• Other, please describe:

Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (check one)

• Yes. Issue #___
• No

The PR fulfills these requirements:

• When resolving a specific issue, it's referenced in the PR's title (e.g. fix: #xxx[,#xxx], where "xxx" is the issue number)
• A change file is added if any packages will require a version bump due to this PR per the instructions in the readme.

If adding a new feature, the PR's description includes:

• A convincing reason for adding this feature (to avoid wasting your time, it's best to open a suggestion issue first and wait for approval before working on it)

Other information:

[amrbashir]

Thanks for your efforts, there is a couple of things to change (I think you copied the recipe from dev branch instead of next which has these fixes already).

For tests, you can add it here https://github.com/tauri-apps/tauri/blob/next/tooling/create-tauri-app/test/spawn.test.mjs#L27 and here https://github.com/tauri-apps/tauri/blob/next/.github/workflows/test-cta.yml#L8

[amrbashir]

I almost forgot, the PR is missing a changefile and please fill out the PR template instead of removing it.

[davedbase]

My apologies @amrbashir I threw this up too quickly then rushed away to another task without reading the procedure properly. I've changed the description with the proper PR template, changefile (I looked at Svelte's changefile) and applied the changes you requested.

[amrbashir]

No need to apologize.

Just some more small changes and this PR is ready to go.

[amrbashir]

Sorry I forgot about these.

[davedbase]

@amrbashir my apologies this PR could have gone a lot smoother. I hope things are looking much better now!

[amrbashir]

yeah the PR looks good to me now but since we are in a feature-freeze phase, it might be a while before it gets merged.

[davedbase]

Yup no worries! Looking forward to when its merged.

[davedbase]

@amrbashir should I be concerned that it's not passing the eslint test? I adjusted the types to mitigate it but it's still stumbling....

[amrbashir]

@amrbashir should I be concerned that it's not passing the eslint test? I adjusted the types to mitigate it but it's still stumbling....

That is actually a formatting issue, should be fixed by running yarn format.

[davedbase]

@amrbashir the test runner didn't list any formatting errors. When I ran prettier it didn't change much except removed end of line. shrugs lol