New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Advance to stage 3 #12

Closed
domenic opened this Issue Jul 23, 2014 · 2 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
2 participants
@domenic
Member

domenic commented Jul 23, 2014

Criteria:

  • Those from stage 2

This is #10

  • Complete spec text

Pending design problems being resolved.

  • Designated reviewers have signed off on the current spec text.

Not sure who these will be?

  • The ECMAScript editor has signed off on the current spec text.

Tracked by #11

Implementation types expected during this stage:

  • Spec compliant

Tracked as #7, #8, #9, #27, #28. Ideally this should be done at the same time as the experimental ones (i.e. there should be no experimental ones, just ones that follow the finalized spec text).

Finally:

  • Get TC39 to agree that we have advanced to stage 3, after meeting all the above requirements.

@domenic domenic referenced this issue Jul 23, 2014

Closed

Advance to stage 4 #13

6 of 6 tasks complete

@domenic domenic added the process label Jul 23, 2014

@ljharb

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@ljharb

ljharb May 27, 2015

Member

Do non-browsers count as implementations? If so, https://www.npmjs.com/es7-shim includes https://www.npmjs.com/package/array-includes which is one, and I believe babel may have one as well.

Member

ljharb commented May 27, 2015

Do non-browsers count as implementations? If so, https://www.npmjs.com/es7-shim includes https://www.npmjs.com/package/array-includes which is one, and I believe babel may have one as well.

@domenic

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@domenic

domenic May 27, 2015

Member

No

Member

domenic commented May 27, 2015

No

@domenic domenic closed this Jul 28, 2015

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment