Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 28 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upTranscription issue in 12.1 identifier definition #358
Comments
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
|
Related to #325? |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
bterlson
Feb 4, 2016
Member
Yes very likely related. Will investigate. Have a few grammarkdown updates that need to get pushed through, this is either one of those or another one :-P Great find!
|
Yes very likely related. Will investigate. Have a few grammarkdown updates that need to get pushed through, this is either one of those or another one :-P Great find! |
claudepache
referenced this issue
Feb 5, 2016
Closed
"but not" does render in grammar productions #363
michaelficarra
referenced this issue
Feb 10, 2016
Closed
B.1.4 AtomEscape production syntax incomplete #378
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
|
Duping against #325. |
bterlson
closed this
Feb 17, 2016
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
littledan commentedFeb 4, 2016
We seem to have lost the words "but not" in the ecmarkup for Identifier
http://tc39.github.io/ecma262/#sec-identifiers
http://www.ecma-international.org/ecma-262/6.0/#sec-identifiers
In the 2015 version, there's "IdentifierName but not ReservedWord", but in 2016, "IdentifierName ReservedWord". Thanks to @nickie for pointing this out
@bterlson