Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 28 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upProvide an abstract operation for the latter part of OrdinarySet #566
Comments
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
domenic
May 11, 2016
Member
I think it'd be best if Web IDL just copied the appropriate steps, actually. There's no clear factoring here. (Also, that is outdated, as there are only 9 steps in what is now called OrdinarySet.)
|
I think it'd be best if Web IDL just copied the appropriate steps, actually. There's no clear factoring here. (Also, that is outdated, as there are only 9 steps in what is now called OrdinarySet.) |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
annevk
May 11, 2016
Contributor
IDL should probably also be rewritten for this since it seems the complexity is only warranted for objects supporting indexed properties. Better to isolate those from the ordinary objects.
|
IDL should probably also be rewritten for this since it seems the complexity is only warranted for objects supporting indexed properties. Better to isolate those from the ordinary objects. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
bterlson
May 11, 2016
Member
Going to go with Domenic's recommendation :-P Feel free to re-open though!
|
Going to go with Domenic's recommendation :-P Feel free to re-open though! |
Ms2ger commentedMay 11, 2016
WebIDL uses
because it wants to replace the definition of ownDesc. It would be better to have an explicit operation for it to call.