`each` instead of `forEach`

[zwhitchcox]

I'm not sure what the exact process is, but I hereby propose we create an alias, each for forEach.

This falls in line with the nomenclature of iterative Array prototype functions in javascript, e.g., every, some, filter, reduce, etc., of having one word to describe the loop. It creates cleaner code, is more precise, and just looks better. It's also a pain to have to write forEach rather than each, and, frankly, the other languages are laughing at us about this.

So, let's write some cleaner code with with each instead of forEach!

[domenic]

See https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md, which was linked in a big yellow warning at the top when you created this issue.

[domenic]

See https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md, which was linked in a big yellow warning at the top when you created this issue.

[zwhitchcox]

Umm, no it wasn't, but ok

[zwhitchcox]

Umm, no it wasn't, but ok

[domenic]

[domenic]

[zwhitchcox]

Well, I didn't see it. And anyway, there's no link to submit a new proposal on that site.

[zwhitchcox]

Well, I didn't see it. And anyway, there's no link to submit a new proposal on that site.

[Lysande]

@zwhitchcox yes, there is:
"Feature requests for future versions of ECMAScript should not be made in this repository. To make a feature request, post to the es-discuss mailing list."

"If you have a new proposal you want to get into the language, you first need a TC39 champion. Head to es-discuss to find one."

[Lysande]

@zwhitchcox yes, there is:
"Feature requests for future versions of ECMAScript should not be made in this repository. To make a feature request, post to the es-discuss mailing list."

"If you have a new proposal you want to get into the language, you first need a TC39 champion. Head to es-discuss to find one."

[zwhitchcox]

Ok, thank you, I have initiated the process to get that done.

[zwhitchcox]

Ok, thank you, I have initiated the process to get that done.