New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bookmarks in the PDF document of the standard does not work #766

Open
nhahtdh opened this Issue Jan 16, 2017 · 6 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
4 participants
@nhahtdh

nhahtdh commented Jan 16, 2017

The bookmarks in the PDF file available at ECMA International website does not work. Tested in both Acrobat Reader and Foxit Reader.

Would you please regenerate the PDF file with working bookmarks?

@bterlson

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@bterlson

bterlson Feb 7, 2017

Member

@nhahtdh what do you mean by bookmarks?

Member

bterlson commented Feb 7, 2017

@nhahtdh what do you mean by bookmarks?

@sjvudp

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@sjvudp

sjvudp Mar 8, 2017

The labels displayed usually in the left frame of a PDF Reader. I just confirmed that: Neither Evince, nor Adobe Acrobat XI is able to jump anywhere from the bookmarks displayed. Furthermore, I checked PDF compatibility, and no problems were detected.
As I still have a copy of v5.1 of ECMA 262 around, I can verify that the bookmarks worked there. Also ‘ECMA-262 6th edition June 2015.pdf’ has working PDF bookmarks.
Also it seems the last working version was produced by Microsoft Word 2010, while the latest version was produced with "Skia/PDF m52".

sjvudp commented Mar 8, 2017

The labels displayed usually in the left frame of a PDF Reader. I just confirmed that: Neither Evince, nor Adobe Acrobat XI is able to jump anywhere from the bookmarks displayed. Furthermore, I checked PDF compatibility, and no problems were detected.
As I still have a copy of v5.1 of ECMA 262 around, I can verify that the bookmarks worked there. Also ‘ECMA-262 6th edition June 2015.pdf’ has working PDF bookmarks.
Also it seems the last working version was produced by Microsoft Word 2010, while the latest version was produced with "Skia/PDF m52".

@bterlson

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@bterlson

bterlson Mar 8, 2017

Member

The PDFs are produced by merely printing the HTML version (with some print-specific stylesheet rules). For me at least, the TOC is clickable (like any other blue links), but it sounds like there is separate metadata for "bookmarks" which show up in some navigation pane. If this is true, I do not intend to support these - having a workable HTML version of the spec is my priority as I have not heard significant desire from implementers for a PDF version. I would like to hear more about why the PDF is preferable to a .html, though!

Member

bterlson commented Mar 8, 2017

The PDFs are produced by merely printing the HTML version (with some print-specific stylesheet rules). For me at least, the TOC is clickable (like any other blue links), but it sounds like there is separate metadata for "bookmarks" which show up in some navigation pane. If this is true, I do not intend to support these - having a workable HTML version of the spec is my priority as I have not heard significant desire from implementers for a PDF version. I would like to hear more about why the PDF is preferable to a .html, though!

@nhahtdh

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@nhahtdh

nhahtdh Aug 15, 2017

Previously, the HTML version doesn't have TOC, which makes it a pain to navigate around different sections, so I have been using PDF version (for version 5.1). The 7.0 specs largely resolved this issue with the TOC in the left panel.

However, this still leaves the gap with version 6.0, which uses a single TOC at the top of the page for HTML version, and non-working bookmark in PDF file.

nhahtdh commented Aug 15, 2017

Previously, the HTML version doesn't have TOC, which makes it a pain to navigate around different sections, so I have been using PDF version (for version 5.1). The 7.0 specs largely resolved this issue with the TOC in the left panel.

However, this still leaves the gap with version 6.0, which uses a single TOC at the top of the page for HTML version, and non-working bookmark in PDF file.

@allenwb

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@allenwb

allenwb Aug 15, 2017

Member

However, this still leaves the gap with version 6.0, ... and non-working bookmark in PDF file.

Note that the edition 6 PDF TOC is navigable with a PDF viewer that support a Table of Contents sidebar view.

Member

allenwb commented Aug 15, 2017

However, this still leaves the gap with version 6.0, ... and non-working bookmark in PDF file.

Note that the edition 6 PDF TOC is navigable with a PDF viewer that support a Table of Contents sidebar view.

@nhahtdh

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@nhahtdh

nhahtdh Aug 16, 2017

@allenwb Never mind. I was confused. Just checked with archive.org, and the version I was looking at was 7th edition.

nhahtdh commented Aug 16, 2017

@allenwb Never mind. I was confused. Just checked with archive.org, and the version I was looking at was 7th edition.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment