The mozilla page for this links back to a non existant page

[OmgImAlexis]

Not sure what can be done about this but this MDN page links back to the github pages repo this for yet it currently goes to a 404 page.

Hopefully someone from here can resolve this issue.

[ljharb]

It's a wiki; anyone can update it.

[ljharb]

It's a wiki; anyone can update it.

[OmgImAlexis]

I have no clue where the links are meant to go though, I figured someone that actually works on this repo may have a better idea.

[OmgImAlexis]

I have no clue where the links are meant to go though, I figured someone that actually works on this repo may have a better idea.

[ljharb]

@OmgImAlexis which links specifically 404? The top two pairs all work fine.

[ljharb]

@OmgImAlexis which links specifically 404? The top two pairs all work fine.

[annevk]

At the bottom it has https://tc39.github.io/ecma262/2016/ and http://tc39.github.io/ecma402/2016/. Links should probably also be changed to HTTPS.

[annevk]

At the bottom it has https://tc39.github.io/ecma262/2016/ and http://tc39.github.io/ecma402/2016/. Links should probably also be changed to HTTPS.

[annevk]

(Go to edit, hit source, then search for "github". I'll fix the lack of HTTPS, not sure about those two links though.)

[annevk]

(Go to edit, hit source, then search for "github". I'll fix the lack of HTTPS, not sure about those two links though.)

[ljharb]

Thanks, will fix

[ljharb]

Thanks, will fix

[ljharb]

k, corrected to point to the ecma-international site instead. Closing.

@bterlson, it'd be really nice if we kept the older years in subdirectories in gh-pages, so we can point people there instead for a snapshot.

[ljharb]

k, corrected to point to the ecma-international site instead. Closing.

@bterlson, it'd be really nice if we kept the older years in subdirectories in gh-pages, so we can point people there instead for a snapshot.

[bterlson]

@ljharb I am not interested in maintaining old snapshots. That is what the ECMA website is for. I will do a better job this year deleting the /2017 branch immediately after ratification which will hopefully cut down on inbound links.

[bterlson]

@ljharb I am not interested in maintaining old snapshots. That is what the ECMA website is for. I will do a better job this year deleting the /2017 branch immediately after ratification which will hopefully cut down on inbound links.

[ljharb]

Fair enough; they wouldn't need maintenance tho, they'd just sit untouched forever.

[ljharb]

Fair enough; they wouldn't need maintenance tho, they'd just sit untouched forever.

[bterlson]

In theory. In practice it will be non-zero amounts of work to maintain :)

[bterlson]

In theory. In practice it will be non-zero amounts of work to maintain :)

[leobalter]

do we have any easy way to set redirects?

[leobalter]

do we have any easy way to set redirects?

[ljharb]

Not on github pages; it'd have to be an index.html with an HTML meta redirect.

[ljharb]

Not on github pages; it'd have to be an index.html with an HTML meta redirect.