Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Editorial: Update date-time format language #1317

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: master
from

Conversation

Projects
None yet
6 participants
@gibson042
Copy link
Contributor

gibson042 commented Sep 28, 2018

  • Use ISO 8601 vocabulary
  • Move interpretation of absent date time elements into Date.parse
@apaprocki
Copy link
Contributor

apaprocki left a comment

Linking to expanded years is a good idea due to the note at the end of it that relates to Date.parse. FWIW these changes look good to me. 👍

@ljharb ljharb requested review from bterlson and tc39/ecma262-editors Nov 12, 2018

@ljharb ljharb requested a review from zenparsing Mar 8, 2019

@ljharb

ljharb approved these changes Mar 8, 2019

@ljharb ljharb self-assigned this Mar 8, 2019

gibson042 added a commit to tc39/proposal-uniform-interchange-date-parsing that referenced this pull request Mar 17, 2019

gibson042 added a commit to tc39/proposal-uniform-interchange-date-parsing that referenced this pull request Mar 17, 2019

@littledan

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

littledan commented Mar 19, 2019

Given that this change is editorial and approved by both editors, can we let it land?

@ljharb

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

ljharb commented Mar 20, 2019

@littledan To ensure that any issues that need to be backported into ES2019 land cleanly, we're not merging anything new for the time being. We'll address this during the editors' update in plenary.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.