Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Editorial: normalize wording used to apply syntax-directed operations #1571

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
from

Conversation

Projects
None yet
3 participants
@michaelficarra
Copy link
Member

commented Jun 7, 2019

  • Normalised the wording of applying a syntax-directed operation
  • Normalised the wording of passing arguments to a syntax-directed operation
  • Used ? shorthand for syntax-directed operations where applicable

I was a bit conflicted between the terse "Operation of |NonTerminal|" and the verbose "the result of applying Operation {for,of,to} |NonTerminal|". I'm happy either way.

I left "the result of evaluating" alone, both for wording normalisation and for usage of ?. Even though it's just another syntax-directed operation, it is invoked using a special form. If the editors decide that we should include evaluation in this normalisation, I'll make the change.

@ljharb

ljharb approved these changes Jun 7, 2019

@ljharb ljharb requested review from zenparsing and tc39/ecma262-editors Jun 7, 2019

Show resolved Hide resolved spec.html

@michaelficarra michaelficarra force-pushed the michaelficarra:normalise-syntax-directed-operations branch from 8414752 to 3562a44 Jun 13, 2019

@ljharb ljharb changed the title Editorial: normalise wording used to apply syntax-directed operations Editorial: normalize wording used to apply syntax-directed operations Jun 13, 2019

michaelficarra added a commit to michaelficarra/ecma262 that referenced this pull request Jun 18, 2019

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.