Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 36 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.Sign up
Editorial: More consistent wording for the %DateTimeFormat%.[[LocaleData]] requirements #360
That is, the old wording is "X must have Y field which is Z", whereas the new wording is "X[Y] must be Z". Does the new wording imply that X[Y] exists? Are there examples elsewhere in ECMA 262 or 402?