You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
I'd like to champion this proposal and reshape it #56
@michaelficarra Two reasons I prefer continue the work in this repo instead a new repo:
We already have a lot of valuable discussions in this repo, which helps all participants to more easily check the history and understand where we are starting from. Starting fresh may cause repetition and reduce efficiency.
Although there may be significant changes, I hope to continue some core use cases and reuse the basic syntax of the original proposal. From the developer's perspective, it may look close to the original proposal. So it could be seen as a new iteration of the proposal (like what happened on decorators proposal). Reusing this repo could decrease the potential confusion.
I really dont understand why such "wall" for this proposal to go on.... is such an amazing feature to manipulate DOM list without boilerplate and a perfect companion for "lodash"-like libraries.... The syntax itself its amazing "::"
I was using it for a long time with babel but I really like that this would be the "standard".... gosh even decorators that are stage 2 are widely implemented in babel/typescript and this proposal that seems really easy to do, is not 👎🏼 .
The new proposal Extensions which is the reshape of the "virtual method" part of this proposal has advanced to stage 1!
Reacted by Michael Ficarra, Luis Arancibia, Chengzhong Wu, Bergi, Joshua Smock, Marc Agbanchenou, lake2, Acid Chicken, Qwerty (Vítězslav Ackermann Ferko), Maciek Sitkowski and 5 more
Activity
michaelficarra commentedon Sep 24, 2020
@hax I'd recommend starting fresh, as this proposal will come with a lot of baggage.
hax commentedon Sep 30, 2020
@michaelficarra Two reasons I prefer continue the work in this repo instead a new repo:
MrXploder commentedon Oct 23, 2020
I really dont understand why such "wall" for this proposal to go on.... is such an amazing feature to manipulate DOM list without boilerplate and a perfect companion for "lodash"-like libraries.... The syntax itself its amazing "::"
I was using it for a long time with babel but I really like that this would be the "standard".... gosh even decorators that are stage 2 are widely implemented in babel/typescript and this proposal that seems really easy to do, is not 👎🏼 .
hax commentedon Nov 19, 2020
The new proposal Extensions which is the reshape of the "virtual method" part of this proposal has advanced to stage 1!
lake2 commentedon Dec 29, 2020
nice!