SpotBugsValidatorTest.java:39-42: Continue migration from...

[0pdd]

The puzzle 884-ab2ca2fa from #884 has to be resolved:

https://github.com/teamed/qulice/blob/3fc6397fd84790caefe24a013133455ec9cd489c/qulice-spotbugs/src/test/java/com.qulice.spotbugs/SpotBugsValidatorTest.java#L39-L42

The puzzle was created by Paulo Lobo on 05-Dec-18.

If you have any technical questions, don't ask me, submit new tickets instead. The task will be "done" when the problem is fixed and the text of the puzzle is removed from the source code. Here is more about PDD and about me.

[0crat]

@krzyk/z please, pay attention to this issue

[0crat]

Job #959 is now in scope, role is DEV

[0crat]

The job #959 assigned to @paulodamaso/z, here is why; the budget is 30 minutes, see §4; please, read §8 and §9; if the task is not clear, read this and this; there will be no monetary reward for this job

[paulodamaso]

@0crat refuse

[0crat]

@0crat refuse (here)

@paulodamaso The user @paulodamaso/z resigned from #959, please stop working. Reason for job resignation: Order was cancelled

[0crat]

Tasks refusal is discouraged, see §6: -15 point(s) just awarded to @paulodamaso/z

[0crat]

@krzyk/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #959; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[krzyk]

@0crat assign @korthout

[0crat]

@0crat assign @korthout (here)

@krzyk The job #959 assigned to @korthout/z, here is why; the budget is 30 minutes, see §4; please, read §8 and §9; if the task is not clear, read this and this; @korthout/z is not a member of this project yet, but they can request to join, as §1 explains; there will be no monetary reward for this job

[0crat]

Manual assignment of issues is discouraged, see §19: -5 point(s) just awarded to @krzyk/z

[korthout]

@krzyk I keep having difficulty implementing this. Running Spotbugs in a separate process like in the findbugs module is difficult to debug, let alone use TDD to implement it. It's a bit discouraging. Ideas on how to approach this? Otherwise, perhaps someone else will have to resolve this one.

[krzyk]

@korthout no worries, I don't have idea right now, maybe I'll jump into it myself when I'll find some spare time

[krzyk]

@0crat refuse

[0crat]

@0crat refuse (here)

@krzyk The user @korthout/z resigned from #959, please stop working. Reason for job resignation: Order was cancelled

[0crat]

@krzyk/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #959; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@krzyk/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #959; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@krzyk/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #959; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@krzyk/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #959; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@krzyk/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #959; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@krzyk/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #959; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@krzyk/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #959; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@krzyk/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #959; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@krzyk/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #959; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@krzyk/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #959; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)