Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove deprecated fields from PipelineResourceResult 🍠 #2011

Conversation

vdemeester
Copy link
Member

@vdemeester vdemeester commented Feb 6, 2020

Changes

The Name and Digest field have been deprecated in a previous
release. This removes the fields from the struct. See
#1392 for the inital issue.

It also reduce code duplication by aliasing some types between
v1alpha1 and v1alpha2.

Signed-off-by: Vincent Demeester vdemeest@redhat.com

/cc @bobcatfish @othomann @dlorenc @sbwsg

Submitter Checklist

These are the criteria that every PR should meet, please check them off as you
review them:

See the contribution guide for more details.

Double check this list of stuff that's easy to miss:

Reviewer Notes

If API changes are included, additive changes must be approved by at least two OWNERS and backwards incompatible changes must be approved by more than 50% of the OWNERS, and they must first be added in a backwards compatible way.

Release Notes

Remove Name and Digest deprecated fields from PipelineResourceResult

@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes Trying to make the CLA bot happy with ppl from different companies work on one commit label Feb 6, 2020
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 6, 2020
@vdemeester vdemeester force-pushed the remove-fields-pipelineresourceresult branch from d8ea9c3 to 1fdf0dd Compare February 6, 2020 16:54
@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sbwsg

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 6, 2020
@bobcatfish
Copy link
Collaborator

/lgtm

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 6, 2020
@chmouel
Copy link
Member

chmouel commented Feb 6, 2020

/lgtm

@vdemeester
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-tekton-pipeline-integration-tests

@bobcatfish
Copy link
Collaborator

I0206 17:34:58.721] 2020/02/06 17:34:58 main.go:734: provider gke, will acquire project type gke-project from boskos
I0206 17:39:58.721] 2020/02/06 17:39:58 main.go:316: Something went wrong: failed to prepare test environment: --provider=gke boskos failed to acquire project: resources not found
I0206 17:39:58.730] Test subprocess exited with code 0

uh oh

it's like boskos knows im build cop

@bobcatfish
Copy link
Collaborator

/test pull-tekton-pipeline-integration-tests

@bobcatfish
Copy link
Collaborator

phew it's just flakey.... "Just" 😅

@vdemeester
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-tekton-pipeline-integration-tests

two flakes in a row 🤔 😓

@vdemeester
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

1 similar comment
@vdemeester
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

The `Name` and `Digest` field have been deprecated in a previous
release. This removes the fields from the struct. See
tektoncd#1392 for the inital issue.

It also reduce code duplication by aliasing some types between
v1alpha1 and v1alpha2.

Signed-off-by: Vincent Demeester <vdemeest@redhat.com>
@vdemeester vdemeester force-pushed the remove-fields-pipelineresourceresult branch from 1fdf0dd to 9668bb2 Compare February 7, 2020 07:30
@tekton-robot tekton-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 7, 2020
@hrishin
Copy link
Member

hrishin commented Feb 7, 2020

/lgtm

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 7, 2020
@afrittoli
Copy link
Member

According to the review notes, this must be approved by 50% of the owners, so here's my
/lgtm
Thanks for fixing this!

@vdemeester
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-tekton-pipeline-integration-tests

@tekton-robot tekton-robot merged commit d6e8f10 into tektoncd:master Feb 7, 2020
@vdemeester vdemeester deleted the remove-fields-pipelineresourceresult branch February 7, 2020 10:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cla: yes Trying to make the CLA bot happy with ppl from different companies work on one commit lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants