Permalink
Browse files

2013-03-14: EUPL reviewed

  • Loading branch information...
Karsten Reincke
Karsten Reincke committed Mar 14, 2013
1 parent b563416 commit be7e4c25a4885deed0d670c1f9e8bd5b9fdb55ca
@@ -21,6 +21,9 @@
\hyphenation{rein-cke}
+\hyphenation{Rein-cke}
\hyphenation{OS-LiC}
\hyphenation{ori-gi-nal}
\hyphenation{bi-na-ry}
+\hyphenation{Li-cen-ce}
+\hyphenation{li-cen-ce}
View
@@ -1 +1 @@
-0.91.3
+0.91.4
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ \section{Apache licensed software}
Today, the current release of the Apache open source license is version 2.0,
elder versions are depricated\footnote{For details $\rightarrow$ OSLiC, pp.\
\pageref{sec:ProtectPowerOfApL}}. Because it focusses primarily on the
-\enquote{redistribution}\footcite[cf.][\nopage wp\ §4]{ApL20OsiLicense2004a},
+\enquote{redistribution}\footcite[cf.][\nopage wp\ §4]{Apl20OsiLicense2004a},
the following simplified Apache specific open source use case
finder\footnote{For details of the general OSUC finder $\rightarrow$ OSLiC, pp.\
\pageref{OsucTokens} and \pageref{OsucDefinitionTree}} can be used:
@@ -146,8 +146,8 @@ \subsection{ApL-1: Using the software only for yourself}
license with respect to this use case:
\begin{itemize}
\item You are allowed to use any kind of Apache software in any sense and in
- any context without any obligations as long as you do not give the software
- to 3rd parties.
+ any context without being obligied to do something as long as you do not
+ give the software to 3rd parties.
\end{itemize}
\item[prohibits] \ldots
@@ -575,8 +575,8 @@ \subsection{ApL-9: Passing a modified library as embedded binary}
\item \textbf{[voluntary:]} Arrange your binary distribution so that the
integrated Apache license and the \emph{notice text file} clearly refer only
to the embedded library and do not disturb the licensing of your own
- overarching work. It's a good tradition to keep the librabries, modules,
- snippet, or plugins in specific directiers which contain also all licensing
+ overarching work. It's a good tradition to keep the libraries, modules,
+ snippet, or plugins in specific directories which contain also all licensing
elements.
\end{itemize}
@@ -599,20 +599,20 @@ \subsection{Discussions and Explanations}
\enquote{[\ldots] to use the trade names, trademarks, service marks, or
product names of the Licensor, except as required for reasonable and customary
use in describing the origin of the Work and reproducing the content of the
- NOTICE file}\footcite[cf.][\nopage wp\ §6]{ApL20OsiLicense2004a}. On the other
+ NOTICE file}\footcite[cf.][\nopage wp\ §6]{Apl20OsiLicense2004a}. On the other
hand, this license alerts that all the patent licenses – granted to those who
\enquote{[\ldots] institute a patent litigation} – will terminate
- automatically\footcite[cf.][\nopage wp\ §3]{ApL20OsiLicense2004a}. Hence, the
+ automatically\footcite[cf.][\nopage wp\ §3]{Apl20OsiLicense2004a}. Hence, the
OSLiC generally (ApL-1 - ApL-9) interdicts to promote products or services by
these elements and to legally fight against patents linked to the software.
\item The ApL also requires to \enquote{[\ldots] give any other recipients of
the Work or Derivative Works a copy of this License}\footcite[cf.][\nopage wp\
- §4.1]{ApL20OsiLicense2004a}. Therefore, all \emph{4others} use cases contain
+ §4.1]{Apl20OsiLicense2004a}. Therefore, all \emph{4others} use cases contain
the respective mandatory condition (ApL-2 - ApL-9).
\item Additionally, the ApL requires, that modifications must be
- marked\footcite[cf.][\nopage wp\ §4.2]{ApL20OsiLicense2004a}. Thus, in all
+ marked\footcite[cf.][\nopage wp\ §4.2]{Apl20OsiLicense2004a}. Thus, in all
cases of passing the modified software in the form of source code the OSLiC
requires to mark the modifications and to integrate a hint into the notice
file – while in all the cases of passing the modified software in the form of
@@ -633,7 +633,7 @@ \subsection{Discussions and Explanations}
integrated as readable copy to each package distributed in the form of source
code, or – in case of binary distibutions – must be displayed
\enquote{[\ldots] if and wherever such third-party notices normally
- appear}\footcite[cf.][\nopage wp\ §4.4]{ApL20OsiLicense2004a}. Thus, the OSLiC
+ appear}\footcite[cf.][\nopage wp\ §4.4]{Apl20OsiLicense2004a}. Thus, the OSLiC
requires mandatorily that all source code distributions must include the
notice text file (ApL-2, ApL-4, ApL-6, ApL-8) and that all distributions of
binary applications which normally show such a copyrigth screen must integrate
@@ -448,8 +448,8 @@ \subsection{BSD-9: Passing a modified library as embedded binary}
licensing elements -- esp.\ the BSD license text, the specific copyright
notice of the original author(s), and the BSD disclaimer -- clearly refer
only to the embedded library and do not disturb the licensing of your own
- overarching work. It's a good tradition to keep the librabries, modules,
- snippet, or plugins in specific directiers which contain also all licensing
+ overarching work. It's a good tradition to keep the libraries, modules,
+ snippet, or plugins in specific directories which contain also all licensing
elements.
\end{itemize}
Oops, something went wrong.

0 comments on commit be7e4c2

Please sign in to comment.