| title | 2022 State of Haskell Survey Results |
|---|
The sixth annual State of Haskell Survey closed this week. This post summarizes the results and makes the raw data available. You may be interested in similar posts from [2021][], [2020][], [2019][], [2018][], and [2017][].
This year the survey received fewer responses than previous years. Compared to last year, it's down by about 9%.
| Year | Responses |
|---|---|
| 2022 | 1038 |
| 2021 | 1152 |
| 2020 | 1348 |
| 2019 | 1211 |
| 2018 | 1361 |
| 2017 | 1335 |
You can download the responses as a [JSON][] or [CSV][] file. Both are licensed under the [ODbL][].
<style> .row { position: relative; } .row:hover { background: #cbc9e2; } .bar { height: 100%; left: 0; max-width: 100%; position: absolute; top: 0; } .purple { background: #9e9ac8; } .blue { background: #67a9cf; } .red { background: #ef8a62; } .percent, .count, .choice { display: inline-block; position: relative; } .percent, .count { text-align: right; width: 3em; } .choice { padding-left: 1em; } </style>- Survey
-
Haskell usage
- Do you use Haskell?
- If you stopped using Haskell, how long did you use it before you stopped?
- If you do not use Haskell, why not?
- How many years have you been using Haskell?
- How frequently do you use Haskell?
- How would you rate your proficiency in Haskell?
- Where do you use Haskell?
- Do you use Haskell at work?
- If you do not use Haskell at work, why not?
- Which programming languages other than Haskell are you fluent in?
- Which types of software do you develop with Haskell?
- Which industries do you use Haskell in?
- Projects
-
Compilers
- Which Haskell compilers do you use?
- Which installation methods do you use for your Haskell compiler?
- Has upgrading your Haskell compiler broken your code in the last year?
- How has upgrading your Haskell compiler broken your code in the last year?
- Which versions of GHC do you use?
- Which language extensions would you like to be enabled by default?
- How important do you feel it would be to have a new version of the Haskell language standard?
-
Tooling
- Which build tools do you use for Haskell?
- Which editors do you use for Haskell?
- Which IDEs do you use for Haskell?
- Which version control systems do you use for Haskell?
- Where do you get Haskell packages from?
- Which tools do you use to test Haskell code?
- Which tools do you use to benchmark Haskell code?
- Infrastructure
- Community
-
Feelings
- I would prefer to use Haskell for my next new project.
- I would recommend using Haskell to others.
- I am satisfied with Haskell as a language.
- Once my Haskell program compiles, it generally does what I intended.
- I think that software written in Haskell is easy to maintain.
- I am satisfied with Haskell's compilers, such as GHC.
- I feel welcome in the Haskell community.
- Haskell's performance meets my needs.
- I am satisfied with Haskell's package repositories, such as Hackage.
- I think Haskell libraries are high quality.
- I think that Haskell libraries perform well.
- Haskell is working well for my team.
- I can find Haskell libraries for the things that I need.
- I think that Haskell libraries work well together.
- I think that Haskell libraries provide a stable API.
- I am satisfied with Haskell's build tools, such as Cabal.
- Haskell is critical to my company's success.
- I have a good understanding of Haskell best practices.
- I think that Haskell libraries are easy to use.
- As a hiring manager, I can easily find qualified Haskell candidates.
- I think Haskell libraries are well documented.
- I can easily compare competing Haskell libraries to select the best one.
- As a candidate, I can easily find Haskell jobs.
- I can easily reason about the performance of my Haskell code.
-
Demographics
- Which country do you live in?
- Do you consider yourself a member of an underrepresented or marginalized group in technology?
- Do you feel your belonging to an underrepresented or marginalized group in technology makes it difficult for you to participate in the Haskell community?
- Are you a student?
- What is the highest level of education you have completed?
- What is your employment status?
- How large is the company you work for?
- How many years have you been coding?
- How many years have you been coding professionally?
- Do you code as a hobby?
- Have you contributed to any open source projects?
- Meta
- Free response
Optional. Single select.
20%
206
2022-11-01
21%
213
2022-11-02
29%
298
2022-11-03
9%
94
2022-11-04
3%
32
2022-11-05
3%
32
2022-11-06
3%
29
2022-11-07
2%
16
2022-11-08
1%
10
2022-11-09
3%
36
2022-11-10
3%
26
2022-11-11
2%
17
2022-11-12
1%
8
2022-11-13
1%
12
2022-11-14
1%
9
2022-11-15
Optional. Single select.
54%
565
No
46%
473
Yes
Optional. Single select.
85%
879
Yes
12%
121
No, but I used to
2%
23
No, I never have
Optional. Single select.
0%
3
Less than 1 day
1%
13
1 day to 1 week
2%
19
1 week to 1 month
6%
58
1 month to 1 year
8%
84
More than 1 year
Optional. Multi select.
11%
114
My company doesn't use Haskell
5%
50
Haskell is too hard to learn
4%
38
Haskell's documentation is not good enough
3%
34
Haskell lacks critical libraries
3%
31
Haskell lacks critical tools
3%
28
Haskell's performance is not good enough
1%
13
Haskell does not support the platforms I need
1%
7
Haskell lacks critical features
4%
44
Other
Optional. Single select.
11%
112
Less than 1
13%
130
1 to 2
11%
117
2 to 3
9%
91
3 to 4
9%
90
4 to 5
7%
73
5 to 6
5%
57
6 to 7
5%
53
7 to 8
4%
37
8 to 9
4%
39
9 to 10
4%
43
10 to 11
3%
28
11 to 12
2%
23
12 to 13
2%
16
13 to 14
2%
16
14 to 15
6%
67
More than 15
Optional. Single select.
37%
389
Daily
24%
252
Weekly
17%
181
Monthly
5%
57
Yearly
8%
80
Rarely
Optional. Single select.
1%
15
I can't write or read Haskell
18%
183
I can write simple programs in Haskell
24%
245
I can write useful, production-ready code but it is a struggle
40%
418
I am productive writing Haskell
15%
156
I'm an expert
Optional. Multi select.
76%
785
Home
49%
504
Industry
18%
192
Academia
7%
70
School
Optional. Single select.
33%
341
Yes, most of the time
16%
167
Yes, some of the time
1%
9
No, but my company does
36%
371
No, but I'd like to
4%
45
No, and I don't want to
Optional. Multi select.
32%
333
My company doesn't use Haskell
9%
95
It's too hard to hire Haskell developers
7%
77
Haskell is too hard to learn
7%
74
Haskell lacks critical libraries
6%
58
Haskell lacks critical tools
5%
51
Haskell's documentation is not good enough
4%
41
Haskell's performance is not good enough
3%
36
Haskell does not support the platforms I need
2%
25
Haskell lacks critical features
5%
55
Other
Optional. Multi select.
56%
582
Python
44%
452
C
42%
434
JavaScript
34%
353
Java
29%
304
Shell
29%
299
C++
26%
274
TypeScript
22%
230
Rust
14%
150
Elm
14%
146
C#
12%
124
Scala
11%
117
Go
11%
113
PureScript
10%
101
Ruby
9%
98
PHP
8%
87
Assembly
7%
74
Ocaml
7%
72
Clojure
7%
69
Lua
7%
68
R
5%
54
Kotlin
5%
50
Perl
5%
49
Matlab
5%
47
F#
4%
42
Erlang
3%
31
Swift
1%
11
Elixir
1%
9
Common Lisp
1%
7
Nix
1%
7
Prolog
1%
6
Agda
1%
6
Julia
1%
6
Scheme
0%
4
Idris
0%
3
Ada
0%
3
Pascal
0%
3
Zig
0%
2
Dart
0%
2
Groovy
0%
2
Haxe
0%
2
Objective-C
6%
67
Other
Optional. Multi select.
63%
654
Command-line programs (CLI)
46%
473
API services (returning non-HTML)
37%
389
Libraries or frameworks
35%
364
Data processing
32%
327
Automation or scripts
26%
272
Web services (returning HTML)
19%
195
Agents or daemons
10%
102
Desktop programs (GUI)
2%
16
Compilers
0%
3
Games
8%
81
Other
Optional. Multi select.
20%
209
Web
17%
181
Academia
13%
138
Banking or finance
11%
118
Education
10%
108
Science
8%
88
Commerce or retail
8%
84
Cryptocurrency
4%
38
Gaming
4%
39
Healthcare or medical
3%
29
Embedded
2%
19
Mobile
2%
22
Government
12%
128
Other
Optional. Single select.
23%
243
0
13%
137
1
12%
123
2
9%
96
3
4%
41
4
4%
38
5
9%
95
6 to 10
2%
16
11 to 20
3%
33
More than 20
Optional. Single select.
6%
65
Less than 1,000 lines of code
16%
164
Between 1,000 and 9,999 lines of code
20%
208
Between 10,000 and 99,999 lines of code
16%
168
More than 100,000 lines of code
Optional. Multi select.
80%
828
Linux
33%
345
MacOS
15%
158
Windows
4%
37
BSD
0%
5
WSL
0%
3
Other
Optional. Multi select.
86%
892
Linux
33%
341
MacOS
25%
255
Windows
5%
54
BSD
2%
24
Android
2%
16
iOS
1%
6
Web
1%
13
Other
Optional. Multi select.
96%
999
GHC
5%
53
GHCJS
0%
4
Clash
0%
2
Hugs
0%
2
Mu
1%
7
Other
Optional. Multi select.
55%
566
ghcup
35%
368
Nix
33%
341
Stack
12%
123
Operating system package
8%
83
Official binaries
6%
66
Source
5%
57
Haskell Platform
4%
37
Homebrew
1%
13
Chocolatey
0%
2
Guix
0%
4
Other
Optional. Single select.
40%
418
No
35%
360
Yes
Optional. Multi select.
26%
266
Incompatible dependencies
18%
185
Expected changes, such as the MonadFail proposal
9%
89
New warnings
6%
66
Compiler bugs
5%
49
Unexpected changes
0%
4
Simplified Subsumption
3%
31
Other
Optional. Multi select.
10%
105
> 9.4
26%
265
9.4
48%
496
9.2
25%
262
9.0
41%
428
8.10.x
7%
76
8.8.x
7%
68
8.6.x
3%
35
< 8.6
Optional. Multi select.
+40%
-2%
+411
-23
LambdaCase
+38%
-4%
+390
-44
OverloadedStrings
+34%
-2%
+350
-22
DeriveGeneric
+33%
-3%
+338
-26
DeriveFunctor
+31%
-3%
+322
-29
BangPatterns
+31%
-3%
+322
-26
GADTs
+30%
-2%
+310
-20
DerivingVia
+30%
-3%
+307
-27
DeriveFoldable
+27%
-2%
+284
-19
TypeApplications
+27%
-2%
+276
-22
DerivingStrategies
+26%
-2%
+275
-20
ScopedTypeVariables
+26%
-3%
+272
-29
GeneralizedNewtypeDeriving
+26%
-3%
+269
-28
DeriveTraversable
+25%
-3%
+258
-28
FlexibleInstances
+25%
-3%
+256
-27
FlexibleContexts
+24%
-4%
+246
-43
DataKinds
+24%
-2%
+244
-23
RankNTypes
+23%
-3%
+241
-26
TupleSections
+22%
-2%
+233
-24
MultiParamTypeClasses
+22%
-3%
+232
-29
TypeFamilies
+22%
-3%
+230
-29
KindSignatures
+20%
-3%
+210
-28
TypeOperators
+20%
-2%
+209
-21
StandaloneDeriving
+19%
-3%
+198
-31
DeriveDataTypeable
+19%
-3%
+194
-27
GADTSyntax
+18%
-4%
+184
-39
MultiWayIf
+18%
-3%
+182
-33
EmptyCase
+18%
-2%
+182
-23
NumericUnderscores
+17%
-3%
+180
-35
ConstraintKinds
+17%
-3%
+178
-28
ExplicitForAll
+17%
-6%
+177
-60
DeriveAnyClass
+17%
-3%
+176
-31
DeriveLift
+17%
-4%
+174
-44
ViewPatterns
+17%
-3%
+173
-36
NamedFieldPuns
+16%
-4%
+166
-39
FunctionalDependencies
+15%
-3%
+159
-33
PatternSynonyms
+15%
-3%
+158
-35
BinaryLiterals
+15%
-3%
+157
-26
InstanceSigs
+14%
-9%
+150
-90
ApplicativeDo
+14%
-6%
+145
-61
BlockArguments
+14%
-3%
+142
-28
StandaloneKindSignatures
+13%
-3%
+139
-36
DefaultSignatures
+13%
-6%
+137
-62
RecordWildCards
+13%
-3%
+136
-36
ImportQualifiedPost
+12%
-3%
+127
-31
ExistentialQuantification
+12%
-4%
+125
-38
PolyKinds
+11%
-5%
+118
-52
DuplicateRecordFields
+11%
-5%
+109
-54
OverloadedRecordDot
+9%
-4%
+93
-37
TypeFamilyDependencies
+8%
-5%
+83
-52
OverloadedLabels
+8%
-4%
+78
-44
NamedWildCards
+8%
-7%
+78
-73
OverloadedLists
+8%
-4%
+78
-37
QuantifiedConstraints
+7%
-4%
+77
-37
HexFloatLiterals
+7%
-5%
+76
-53
NoStarIsType
+7%
-5%
+75
-51
Rank2Types
+7%
-5%
+73
-48
DisambiguateRecordFields
+7%
-5%
+72
-51
UnicodeSyntax
+7%
-6%
+70
-58
OverloadedRecordUpdate
+7%
-3%
+69
-33
NegativeLiterals
+6%
-4%
+67
-37
PackageImports
+6%
-4%
+65
-41
TypeSynonymInstances
+6%
-4%
+60
-37
RoleAnnotations
+6%
-4%
+58
-45
TypeInType
+5%
-7%
+57
-72
QuasiQuotes
+5%
-5%
+55
-55
PartialTypeSignatures
+5%
-10%
+49
-108
TemplateHaskell
+5%
-13%
+48
-134
AllowAmbiguousTypes
+5%
-5%
+48
-54
RecursiveDo
+5%
-9%
+47
-93
StrictData
+4%
-5%
+45
-47
ConstrainedClassMethods
+4%
-3%
+44
-36
ExplicitNamespaces
+4%
-4%
+42
-44
LiberalTypeSynonyms
+4%
-10%
+41
-99
Arrows
+4%
-9%
+40
-91
NoImplicitPrelude
+3%
-5%
+36
-50
UnboxedTuples
+3%
-6%
+35
-67
MagicHash
+3%
-4%
+35
-38
NullaryTypeClasses
+3%
-5%
+35
-50
UnboxedSums
+3%
-5%
+35
-47
UnliftedNewtypes
+3%
-6%
+34
-64
ForeignFunctionInterface
+3%
-10%
+33
-101
UndecidableInstances
+3%
-5%
+32
-48
UnliftedDatatypes
+3%
-7%
+31
-69
ImpredicativeTypes
+3%
-3%
+31
-34
NumDecimals
+3%
-5%
+31
-55
PostfixOperators
+3%
-8%
+29
-83
LinearTypes
+3%
-7%
+28
-76
MonadComprehensions
+3%
-5%
+28
-57
NoMonomorphismRestriction
+3%
-8%
+27
-79
DatatypeContexts
+3%
-8%
+27
-87
ImplicitParams
+3%
-6%
+26
-67
NoFieldSelectors
+2%
-5%
+25
-54
ParallelListComp
+2%
-8%
+24
-81
CApiFFI
+2%
-9%
+23
-93
OverlappingInstances
+2%
-12%
+21
-124
Cpp
+2%
-11%
+21
-111
Strict
+2%
-9%
+19
-97
TemplateHaskellQuotes
+2%
-5%
+18
-48
MonoLocalBinds
+2%
-8%
+18
-88
UndecidableSuperClasses
+1%
-6%
+15
-61
TransformListComp
+1%
-5%
+14
-51
ExtendedDefaultRules
+1%
-9%
+12
-93
RebindableSyntax
+1%
-6%
+11
-63
InterruptibleFFI
+1%
-5%
+10
-54
StaticPointers
+1%
-8%
+9
-83
Trustworthy
+1%
-11%
+8
-119
IncoherentInstances
+1%
-9%
+8
-97
NPlusKPatterns
+1%
-6%
+6
-67
NoMonadFailDesugaring
+1%
-7%
+6
-70
NoPatternGuards
+0%
-6%
+5
-64
NoTraditionalRecordSyntax
+0%
-7%
+3
-76
NoEmptyDataDecls
+0%
-10%
+3
-100
Unsafe
Optional. Single select.
8%
84
Extremely important
14%
147
Very important
29%
301
Moderately important
18%
191
Slightly important
10%
108
Not at all important
Optional. Multi select.
67%
700
Cabal
49%
513
Stack
33%
344
Nix
12%
123
haskell.nix
10%
101
Make
5%
54
Shake
5%
47
ghc-pkg
3%
32
Bazel
0%
1
Guix
1%
13
Other
Optional. Multi select.
43%
450
Visual Studio Code
40%
413
Vi family
30%
309
Emacs family
3%
33
IntelliJ IDEA
3%
30
Sublime Text
1%
9
Atom
1%
7
Kakoune
1%
7
Helix
0%
4
Notepad++
0%
2
Geany
1%
15
Other
Optional. Multi select.
68%
709
Haskell Language Server (HLS)
17%
177
ghcid
3%
31
IntelliJ
3%
29
ghcide
1%
6
Intero
1%
6
Dante
0%
2
GHCi
1%
10
Other
Optional. Multi select.
94%
972
Git
2%
25
Darcs
1%
14
Mercurial
0%
3
Fossil
0%
3
Pijul
0%
3
Other
Optional. Multi select.
70%
730
Hackage
44%
461
Stackage
32%
327
Nix
24%
253
Source
2%
18
Other
Optional. Multi select.
51%
528
QuickCheck
42%
431
Hspec
29%
300
Tasty
28%
288
HUnit
16%
163
Hedgehog
5%
50
SmallCheck
3%
26
Haskell Test Framework
0%
3
doctest
2%
18
Other
Optional. Multi select.
30%
315
Criterion
4%
46
tasty-bench
4%
42
Bench
3%
27
Gauge
1%
12
Other
Optional. Multi select.
37%
388
Static binaries
30%
316
Docker images
24%
245
Nix expressions
14%
146
Dynamic binaries
2%
21
Other
Optional. Multi select.
40%
418
Self or company owned servers
23%
240
Amazon Web Services
6%
62
Google Cloud
4%
44
Digital Ocean
3%
26
Heroku
2%
23
Microsoft Azure
1%
8
Linode
0%
5
Hetzner
5%
50
Other
Optional. Multi select.
51%
533
Reddit
50%
515
GitHub
23%
241
Twitter
21%
221
Stack Overflow
18%
189
Discord
17%
177
IRC
16%
167
Mailing lists
15%
158
Discourse
13%
135
Conferences (academic)
12%
129
Conferences (commercial)
12%
125
Slack
10%
101
Telegram
9%
95
Meetups
7%
77
Matrix/Riot
4%
45
Lobsters
4%
38
Mastodon
2%
18
Zulip
1%
11
Gitter
1%
6
Cohost
0%
3
Hacker News
2%
22
Other
Optional. Multi select.
50%
521
Best practices
40%
420
Design patterns
37%
388
Application architectures
35%
363
Performance analysis
32%
331
Debugging how-tos
28%
286
Production infrastructure
26%
275
Library walkthroughs
26%
270
Tooling choices
26%
266
Case studies
24%
249
Algorithm implementations
21%
221
Project maintenance
20%
203
Web development
19%
197
GUIs
19%
195
Testing
18%
187
Project setup
16%
161
Beginner fundamentals
15%
159
Machine learning
14%
144
Game development
13%
131
Mobile development
9%
94
Comparisons to other languages
4%
40
Other
Optional. Single select.
52%
544
Strongly agree
25%
261
Agree
8%
85
Neutral
4%
39
Disagree
2%
17
Strongly disagree
Optional. Single select.
43%
442
Strongly agree
36%
373
Agree
8%
84
Neutral
3%
36
Disagree
1%
12
Strongly disagree
Optional. Single select.
32%
336
Strongly agree
47%
488
Agree
9%
90
Neutral
6%
60
Disagree
1%
9
Strongly disagree
Optional. Single select.
28%
293
Strongly agree
48%
494
Agree
11%
113
Neutral
4%
44
Disagree
1%
8
Strongly disagree
Optional. Single select.
34%
356
Strongly agree
35%
368
Agree
12%
127
Neutral
3%
36
Disagree
1%
14
Strongly disagree
Optional. Single select.
29%
297
Strongly agree
49%
506
Agree
10%
99
Neutral
5%
47
Disagree
1%
15
Strongly disagree
Optional. Single select.
31%
321
Strongly agree
36%
369
Agree
17%
173
Neutral
3%
30
Disagree
1%
9
Strongly disagree
Optional. Single select.
25%
261
Strongly agree
45%
468
Agree
11%
109
Neutral
5%
53
Disagree
1%
13
Strongly disagree
Optional. Single select.
18%
191
Strongly agree
45%
472
Agree
18%
190
Neutral
6%
66
Disagree
1%
14
Strongly disagree
Optional. Single select.
17%
181
Strongly agree
45%
472
Agree
21%
218
Neutral
4%
45
Disagree
1%
15
Strongly disagree
Optional. Single select.
10%
104
Strongly agree
45%
471
Agree
22%
232
Neutral
3%
29
Disagree
1%
7
Strongly disagree
Optional. Single select.
21%
215
Strongly agree
18%
183
Agree
8%
85
Neutral
2%
20
Disagree
1%
8
Strongly disagree
Optional. Single select.
10%
104
Strongly agree
48%
503
Agree
21%
222
Neutral
8%
86
Disagree
2%
21
Strongly disagree
Optional. Single select.
9%
94
Strongly agree
39%
400
Agree
26%
271
Neutral
8%
85
Disagree
2%
16
Strongly disagree
Optional. Single select.
7%
73
Strongly agree
36%
378
Agree
27%
281
Neutral
8%
86
Disagree
2%
25
Strongly disagree
Optional. Single select.
11%
109
Strongly agree
40%
413
Agree
22%
230
Neutral
13%
136
Disagree
5%
53
Strongly disagree
Optional. Single select.
16%
171
Strongly agree
11%
118
Agree
10%
99
Neutral
8%
79
Disagree
5%
50
Strongly disagree
Optional. Single select.
9%
95
Strongly agree
35%
364
Agree
26%
270
Neutral
18%
184
Disagree
4%
42
Strongly disagree
Optional. Single select.
4%
38
Strongly agree
32%
336
Agree
34%
350
Neutral
15%
159
Disagree
4%
38
Strongly disagree
Optional. Single select.
3%
29
Strongly agree
5%
55
Agree
5%
55
Neutral
5%
52
Disagree
3%
32
Strongly disagree
Optional. Single select.
3%
29
Strongly agree
26%
274
Agree
34%
350
Neutral
21%
223
Disagree
7%
69
Strongly disagree
Optional. Single select.
3%
29
Strongly agree
20%
203
Agree
28%
293
Neutral
30%
312
Disagree
8%
86
Strongly disagree
Optional. Single select.
3%
32
Strongly agree
9%
98
Agree
12%
128
Neutral
18%
189
Disagree
14%
150
Strongly disagree
Optional. Single select.
3%
27
Strongly agree
15%
157
Agree
27%
278
Neutral
30%
307
Disagree
12%
128
Strongly disagree
Optional. Single select.
26%
266
United States
10%
100
Germany
7%
76
United Kingdom
4%
44
Russia
4%
42
Netherlands
3%
36
Australia
3%
33
Canada
3%
33
France
3%
32
Sweden
2%
22
Poland
2%
19
India
2%
17
Brazil
2%
17
Japan
2%
16
Austria
2%
16
Switzerland
1%
15
Czech Republic
1%
14
Finland
1%
13
Italy
1%
12
China
1%
12
Spain
1%
11
Norway
1%
9
Ukraine
1%
7
Bulgaria
1%
7
Belgium
1%
7
Denmark
1%
6
Argentina
1%
6
Portugal
1%
6
Singapore
1%
6
Taiwan
0%
5
Armenia
0%
5
Israel
0%
5
Mexico
0%
4
Lithuania
0%
4
Serbia and Montenegro
0%
3
Belarus
0%
3
Croatia
0%
3
Estonia
0%
3
Georgia
0%
3
Ireland
0%
3
New Zealand
0%
3
Romania
0%
3
South Africa
0%
3
South Korea
0%
2
Chile
0%
2
Colombia
0%
2
Ecuador
0%
2
Hungary
0%
2
Indonesia
0%
2
Iran
0%
2
Iraq
0%
2
Kazakhstan
0%
2
Latvia
0%
2
Slovakia
0%
2
Thailand
0%
2
Turkey
0%
1
Cyprus
0%
1
Greece
0%
1
Isle of Man
0%
1
Kenya
0%
1
Kyrgyzstan
0%
1
Luxembourg
0%
1
Nepal
0%
1
United Arab Emirates
0%
1
Uruguay
0%
1
Vietnam
Optional. Multi select.
10%
103
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, queer or otherwise non-heterosexual
5%
56
Disabled or person with disability (including physical, mental, and other)
5%
55
Political beliefs
5%
54
Older or younger than the average developers I know
5%
49
Racial or ethnic minority
4%
46
Trans
4%
39
Woman or perceived as a woman
4%
39
Yes, but I prefer not to say which
3%
32
Non-binary gender
3%
30
Educational background
3%
27
Religious beliefs
2%
25
Cultural beliefs
2%
25
Language
2%
24
Other
Do you feel your belonging to an underrepresented or marginalized group in technology makes it difficult for you to participate in the Haskell community?
Optional. Single select.
22%
224
Never
7%
71
Sometimes
1%
9
Often
Optional. Single select.
72%
750
No
11%
112
Yes, full time
4%
45
Yes, part time
Optional. Single select.
1%
15
Less than high school diploma
8%
81
High school diploma
7%
74
Some college
1%
13
Associate degree
33%
341
Bachelor's degree
27%
284
Master's degree
3%
30
Professional degree
13%
134
Doctoral degree
Optional. Single select.
69%
712
Employed full time
6%
61
Employed part time
8%
85
Self employed
4%
40
Not employed, and not looking for work
5%
47
Not employed, but looking for work
1%
8
Retired
Optional. Single select.
9%
92
Fewer than 10 employees
23%
238
10 to 99 employees
24%
247
100 to 999 employees
23%
235
More than 1,000 employees
Optional. Single select.
5%
54
0 to 4 years
21%
217
5 to 9 years
24%
246
10 to 14 years
14%
144
15 to 19 years
11%
116
20 to 24 years
8%
80
25 to 29 years
12%
122
30 or more years
Optional. Single select.
24%
252
0 to 4 years
22%
233
5 to 9 years
18%
184
10 to 14 years
9%
95
15 to 19 years
8%
81
20 to 24 years
3%
35
25 to 29 years
3%
33
30 or more years
Optional. Single select.
87%
907
Yes
7%
73
No
Optional. Single select.
78%
805
Yes
16%
161
No
Optional. Multi select.
36%
378
2021
30%
314
2020
19%
201
2019
12%
126
2018
9%
93
2017
Optional. Multi select.
28%
289
Reddit
18%
188
Haskell Weekly
8%
87
Twitter
8%
84
Slack
7%
71
Mailing lists
6%
64
Telegram
5%
56
Discourse
5%
56
Hacker News
3%
31
Lobsters
3%
30
In person
3%
29
Discord
2%
16
Mastodon
1%
14
IRC
1%
10
Cohost
0%
4
Matrix/Riot
0%
3
GitHub
3%
36
Other
Optional. Free response answers were collected but not analyzed.
Optional. Free response answers were collected but not analyzed.
[2021]: {% post_url 2021-11-16-haskell-survey-results %} [2020]: {% post_url 2020-11-22-haskell-survey-results %} [2019]: {% post_url 2019-11-16-haskell-survey-results %} [2018]: {% post_url 2018-11-18-2018-state-of-haskell-survey-results %} [2017]: {% post_url 2017-11-15-2017-state-of-haskell-survey-results %} [JSON]: /static/pages/2022-state-of-haskell-survey-results.json.zip [CSV]: /static/pages/2022-state-of-haskell-survey-results.csv.zip [ODbL]: https://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/