Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes #8710 - introduced foreman-debug subpackage #490

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 12, 2015

Conversation

lzap
Copy link
Member

@lzap lzap commented Jan 14, 2015

Is this kosher?

@domcleal
Copy link
Contributor

Yeah, that's OK. Can you do the same for the debs?

@domcleal
Copy link
Contributor

plus a comps update

@lzap
Copy link
Member Author

lzap commented Jan 15, 2015

Sure, I was thinking to require this package by foreman-proxy. What do you think?

Also as my next step, I want to add foreman-proxy support (files which are only on proxy + underlaying services).

@domcleal
Copy link
Contributor

I guess that's OK - the dependency seems slightly strange, but I can't think of a reason why it'd be a problem.

@lzap
Copy link
Member Author

lzap commented Feb 2, 2015

Pushed the comps as well as proxy part.

Foreman: http://koji.katello.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=218303
Proxy: http://koji.katello.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=218309

@dLobatog
Copy link
Member

dLobatog commented Feb 9, 2015

foreman & smart-proxy pieces are now merged

@@ -184,6 +188,7 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot}
%{_unitdir}/%{name}.service
%{_prefix}/lib/tmpfiles.d/%{name}.conf
%endif
/usr/share/foreman/script/foreman-debug.d/75-foreman-proxy
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

_datadir, ditto above

@lzap
Copy link
Member Author

lzap commented Feb 10, 2015

All fixed sorry for the delay. http://koji.katello.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=220938

@lzap
Copy link
Member Author

lzap commented Feb 10, 2015

Is there anything else than this PR that blocks the branching/release?

@domcleal
Copy link
Contributor

@lzap this PR and we need an equivalent for deb/develop

@@ -559,6 +573,8 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot}
%dir %{_datadir}/%{name}
%{_datadir}/%{name}/app
%exclude %{_datadir}/%{name}/app/assets
%exclude %{_datadir}/%{name}/bundler.d/*
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

remove this line, not required

@domcleal
Copy link
Contributor

Do you have a scratch build of foreman-proxy too please?

@lzap
Copy link
Member Author

lzap commented Feb 10, 2015

Hmm it failed.

@lzap
Copy link
Member Author

lzap commented Feb 10, 2015

Gimme a min to rebuild.

@lzap
Copy link
Member Author

lzap commented Feb 10, 2015

http://koji.katello.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=220999 foreman-proxy
http://koji.katello.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=221002 foreman

@GregSutcliffe can you provide me a guidiance of similar change for debian please? I have zero idea how to do that.

@@ -196,6 +199,17 @@ Meta Package to install hammer rubygems and its dependencies

%files cli

%package debug
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There's a requires in 'foreman' for rsync, could you move it to the debug package please, as it's used by foreman-debug.

@lzap
Copy link
Member Author

lzap commented Feb 12, 2015

Fixed. Debian package is on my radar, although I'd appreciate guidiance from @GregSutcliffe. I've never created a subpackage in Debian... http://www.doudoulinux.org/web/english/contribute/developers/working-within-debian/article/splitting-a-debian-package.html

domcleal added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2015
Fixes #8710 - introduced foreman-debug subpackage
@domcleal domcleal merged commit 317de00 into theforeman:rpm/develop Feb 12, 2015
@domcleal
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @lzap!

Sure, there are a few of us who I'm sure would be happy to help or maybe even do it. (Michael, Tomas, Greg and myself for instance.)

@lzap
Copy link
Member Author

lzap commented Feb 12, 2015

I think I can handle it. Thanks.

@lzap lzap deleted the foreman-debug-sub-8710 branch February 12, 2015 15:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
4 participants