New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add section to README about project naming history #943

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
from

Conversation

Projects
None yet
4 participants
@mjankowski
Member

mjankowski commented Aug 30, 2016

This is an attempt to address the concerns raised in #921 and #849 without a full project rename.

@croaky

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@croaky

croaky Aug 30, 2016

Contributor

Duplicate of #942?

How about a link from the README to a NAME.md?

Contributor

croaky commented Aug 30, 2016

Duplicate of #942?

How about a link from the README to a NAME.md?

@mjankowski

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@mjankowski

mjankowski Aug 30, 2016

Member

I saw #942 immediately after creating this, and send my regards to that PR.

Is your suggestion to move out the whole explanation to a new file so that we reduce the text being added to README, but make sure we link (earlyish in the file) to that naming explanation from the README?

Member

mjankowski commented Aug 30, 2016

I saw #942 immediately after creating this, and send my regards to that PR.

Is your suggestion to move out the whole explanation to a new file so that we reduce the text being added to README, but make sure we link (earlyish in the file) to that naming explanation from the README?

Show outdated Hide outdated README.md
Show outdated Hide outdated README.md
@croaky

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@croaky

croaky Aug 30, 2016

Contributor

Is your suggestion to move out the whole explanation to a new file so that we reduce the text being added to README, but make sure we link (earlyish in the file) to that naming explanation from the README?

Yup

Contributor

croaky commented Aug 30, 2016

Is your suggestion to move out the whole explanation to a new file so that we reduce the text being added to README, but make sure we link (earlyish in the file) to that naming explanation from the README?

Yup

Show outdated Hide outdated NAME.md
Show outdated Hide outdated README.md
Show outdated Hide outdated NAME.md
Show outdated Hide outdated NAME.md
@mjankowski

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@mjankowski

mjankowski Aug 30, 2016

Member

Made a new file, reduced some verbiage, squashed, probably acceptable for a first pass thing which can be expanded later.

Member

mjankowski commented Aug 30, 2016

Made a new file, reduced some verbiage, squashed, probably acceptable for a first pass thing which can be expanded later.

Show outdated Hide outdated NAME.md
Show outdated Hide outdated NAME.md
@joshuaclayton

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@joshuaclayton

joshuaclayton Oct 7, 2016

Member

Thanks @mjankowski; merged as 903d432

Member

joshuaclayton commented Oct 7, 2016

Thanks @mjankowski; merged as 903d432

This was referenced Oct 7, 2016

@joshuaclayton joshuaclayton deleted the mj-explain-the-name branch Dec 16, 2016

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment