Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

investigate if we can/should use AppImage for our Linux users #81

Closed
GlenDC opened this issue Jun 4, 2019 · 4 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
2 participants
@GlenDC
Copy link
Contributor

commented Jun 4, 2019

@GlenDC GlenDC added the type_feature label Jun 4, 2019

@GlenDC GlenDC added this to the alpha-1 milestone Jun 4, 2019

@GlenDC GlenDC changed the title investigate if we can/should use AppImage for our Linux users. investigate if we can/should use AppImage for our Linux users Jun 4, 2019

@xmonader

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Collaborator

commented Jun 4, 2019

it seems to work fine and it's very popular choice https://appimage.github.io/apps/

  • requires libfuse (which is popular) for linux user (e.g used for sshfs, ipfs)
  • size generated 70mb for the wallet
  • built easily with yarn package-linux

icons seems to be bundled incorrectly in the generated binary

@GlenDC

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor Author

commented Jun 4, 2019

Please investigate the remaining issues when you can.

@GlenDC

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor Author

commented Jun 7, 2019

Any progress @xmonader?

@xmonader

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Collaborator

commented Jun 7, 2019

@GlenDC I'll fix the icons problem & document and close it on sunday

@xmonader xmonader referenced this issue Jun 9, 2019

Merged

Linux packaging #88

@GlenDC GlenDC removed this from the alpha-1 milestone Jun 11, 2019

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.