New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Downloading is very slow #39

Closed
ianlewis opened this Issue Apr 29, 2011 · 4 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
2 participants
@ianlewis

ianlewis commented Apr 29, 2011

Downloading even for files that have already been cached and stored in the file storage is very slow. On my local machine files that are only 55kb take over a second to load in the browser for each file.

@heynemann

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@heynemann

heynemann Apr 29, 2011

Member

Why do you think that is? I'm going to look into that, because the storage should just read the file from the FS or from Redis or Mongo.

Member

heynemann commented Apr 29, 2011

Why do you think that is? I'm going to look into that, because the storage should just read the file from the FS or from Redis or Mongo.

@ianlewis

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@ianlewis

ianlewis Apr 29, 2011

I really can't say for sure. I haven't dived very far into the codebase yet. It might be something I was doing wrong.

Do you get reasonable speeds from the server? What versions of python and tornado are you guys testing with?

On 2011/04/29, at 21:24, heynemannreply@reply.github.com wrote:

Why do you think that is? I'm going to look into that, because the storage should just read the file from the FS or from Redis or Mongo.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#39 (comment)

ianlewis commented Apr 29, 2011

I really can't say for sure. I haven't dived very far into the codebase yet. It might be something I was doing wrong.

Do you get reasonable speeds from the server? What versions of python and tornado are you guys testing with?

On 2011/04/29, at 21:24, heynemannreply@reply.github.com wrote:

Why do you think that is? I'm going to look into that, because the storage should just read the file from the FS or from Redis or Mongo.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#39 (comment)

@heynemann

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@heynemann

heynemann Apr 29, 2011

Member

Python 2.6 and latest tornado.

I'll look into that if you can't! :) It's just if we share the load among us
thumbor grows faster. :)

Not a biggie, though! Thanks anyways for the invaluable feedback.

Cheers,
Bernardo Heynemann

On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:35 AM, IanLewis <
reply@reply.github.com>wrote:

I really can't say for sure. I haven't dived very far into the codebase
yet. It might be something I was doing wrong.

Do you get reasonable speeds from the server? What versions of python and
tornado are you guys testing with?

On 2011/04/29, at 21:24, heynemannreply@reply.github.com wrote:

Why do you think that is? I'm going to look into that, because the
storage should just read the file from the FS or from Redis or Mongo.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#39 (comment)

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#39 (comment)

Member

heynemann commented Apr 29, 2011

Python 2.6 and latest tornado.

I'll look into that if you can't! :) It's just if we share the load among us
thumbor grows faster. :)

Not a biggie, though! Thanks anyways for the invaluable feedback.

Cheers,
Bernardo Heynemann

On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:35 AM, IanLewis <
reply@reply.github.com>wrote:

I really can't say for sure. I haven't dived very far into the codebase
yet. It might be something I was doing wrong.

Do you get reasonable speeds from the server? What versions of python and
tornado are you guys testing with?

On 2011/04/29, at 21:24, heynemannreply@reply.github.com wrote:

Why do you think that is? I'm going to look into that, because the
storage should just read the file from the FS or from Redis or Mongo.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#39 (comment)

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#39 (comment)

@heynemann

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@heynemann

heynemann Jun 9, 2011

Member

I'm not sure why are you getting this, but I was testing today just loading a file from storage and using AB hitting the server hard with 30 simultaneous connections I got times around 25-40msec. So I'm closing this.

Member

heynemann commented Jun 9, 2011

I'm not sure why are you getting this, but I was testing today just loading a file from storage and using AB hitting the server hard with 30 simultaneous connections I got times around 25-40msec. So I'm closing this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment