arm32v7/ubuntu:latest fails to update #183
Comments
|
I'm not able to reproduce, so I wonder if this is possibly related to debuerreotype/docker-debian-artifacts#97 / moby/moby#40739 ? |
|
Confirmed, I tested on an |
|
I'm not familiar with that issue, but I used this Docker image in hundreds of Travis runs so far, without problems. Was the image updated recently? |
|
Yes, the image is updated roughly every 30 days (it's |
|
I understand that it is latest, but I hoped it is 'latest functional', not latest broken. :-( Any idea when the image will be again functional? Should I remove it from the Travis test completely? (I use many 'latest' images, only this one failed). |
|
Well to be clear, As for whether it's functional, the image is functional, but your environment (Travis) has an outdated To fix this, you'll need to make sure your Docker version is newer than 19.03.9, and that you have a Alternatively, you can use |
|
(The next release of Debian is going to suffer from the same change -- see debuerreotype/docker-debian-artifacts#97.) |
I confirm, with this workaround the Travis test passed. Thank you, Liviu |
…until Docker on Travis CI is updated See tianon/docker-brew-ubuntu-core#183 for more details. We are running on a VM so it's definitely an acceptable trade-off. Signed-off-by: Eugenio Paolantonio (g7) <me@medesimo.eu>
…until Docker on Travis CI is updated See tianon/docker-brew-ubuntu-core#183 for more details. We are running on a VM so it's definitely an acceptable trade-off. Signed-off-by: Eugenio Paolantonio (g7) <me@medesimo.eu>
…until Docker on Travis CI is updated See tianon/docker-brew-ubuntu-core#183 for more details. We are running on a VM so it's definitely an acceptable trade-off. Signed-off-by: Eugenio Paolantonio (g7) <me@medesimo.eu>
…until Docker on Travis CI is updated See tianon/docker-brew-ubuntu-core#183 for more details. We are running on a VM so it's definitely an acceptable trade-off. Signed-off-by: Eugenio Paolantonio (g7) <me@medesimo.eu>
…until Docker on Travis CI is updated See tianon/docker-brew-ubuntu-core#183 for more details. We are running on a VM so it's definitely an acceptable trade-off. Signed-off-by: Eugenio Paolantonio (g7) <me@medesimo.eu>
…distribution 32-bit containers on 64-bit hosts are broken if they have a somewhat recent glibc release, see tianon/docker-brew-ubuntu-core#183 for more details. Jobs declaring DOCKER_UPDATE = "yes" will get the newer docker version. Signed-off-by: Eugenio Paolantonio (g7) <me@medesimo.eu>
…dated See tianon/docker-brew-ubuntu-core#183 for more details. Docker in focal does not (yet) have the fix. We are running in a VM anyways, so it's an acceptable trade-off. Signed-off-by: Eugenio Paolantonio (g7) <me@medesimo.eu>
…dated See tianon/docker-brew-ubuntu-core#183 for more details. Docker in focal does not (yet) have the fix. We are running in a VM anyways, so it's an acceptable trade-off. Signed-off-by: Eugenio Paolantonio (g7) <me@medesimo.eu>
|
Hi, reproduced with CentOS 7.7 and libseccomp-2.3.1-3.el7.x86_64 . I did a OS update and apparently, the update to libseccomp-2.3.1-4.el7.x86_64 fixed the issue for info. |
I used this Docker image for quite a while in Travis tests, but now I see it failing to update:
(the console is a bit out of order, but this shouldn't be a problem)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: