New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Compatibility with Ordinal package #156

Closed
roxannebeauclair opened this Issue Aug 26, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
3 participants
@roxannebeauclair

roxannebeauclair commented Aug 26, 2016

Hi,

This is just a suggestion: but could you potentially make broom compatible with different classes of models produced through the Ordinal package? For example, clm, clmm, clm2, clmm2?

Thanks for your time and consideration.
Roxy

@larmarange

This comment has been minimized.

Contributor

larmarange commented Feb 22, 2018

For information, there is already a tidy method developed for clm objects: https://github.com/dnbarron/tidyclm

@alexpghayes

This comment has been minimized.

Collaborator

alexpghayes commented Jun 6, 2018

Closing in favor of #292 and the potentially PR from that.

@alexpghayes alexpghayes closed this Jun 6, 2018

larmarange added a commit to larmarange/broom that referenced this issue Jun 8, 2018

larmarange added a commit to larmarange/broom that referenced this issue Jun 8, 2018

larmarange added a commit to larmarange/broom that referenced this issue Jun 8, 2018

larmarange added a commit to larmarange/broom that referenced this issue Jun 8, 2018

@alexpghayes

This comment has been minimized.

Collaborator

alexpghayes commented Jun 8, 2018

Merged! You can either use the dev version and install from github or wait for the broom 0.5.0 release in early July.

Thanks @larmarange yet again!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment