Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding step_select() #199

Closed
lorenzwalthert opened this issue Sep 25, 2018 · 4 comments · Fixed by #657
Closed

Adding step_select() #199

lorenzwalthert opened this issue Sep 25, 2018 · 4 comments · Fixed by #657
Assignees
Labels
feature a feature request or enhancement

Comments

@lorenzwalthert
Copy link
Contributor

lorenzwalthert commented Sep 25, 2018

It would be nice to have an analogue of step_rm() to select variables (much like dplyr::select()). If it already exists (I could not find it), it seems meaningful to reference it in the documentation of step_rm(). What do you think?

@topepo
Copy link
Member

topepo commented Sep 25, 2018

We will be adding some dplyr verbs like mutate, filter, and select to recipes. I believe that those will take care of the request.

@lorenzwalthert
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes thanks.

@DavisVaughan
Copy link
Member

Reopening at the request of @edgararuiz. @topepo why wasn't step_select() implemented?

The use case was just to be able to intuitively do step_select(all_numeric())

@DavisVaughan DavisVaughan reopened this Mar 12, 2019
@topepo topepo added the feature a feature request or enhancement label Jun 5, 2020
@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has been automatically locked. If you believe you have found a related problem, please file a new issue (with a reprex https://reprex.tidyverse.org) and link to this issue.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 25, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
feature a feature request or enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants