Skip to content

Issues: tidymodels/tune

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

35 Open 307 Closed
35 Open 307 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Label
Filter by label
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Could get_rsplit() add a method for resample_results from tune::fit_resamples()?
#687 opened May 22, 2023 by mikemahoney218
1
AUC can be calculated as less than 0.5 using fit_resamples
#685 opened May 18, 2023 by kjbeath
add support for multiple outcomes to grid_performance.R
#673 opened Apr 15, 2023 by rdavis120
tune_grid() fails if parameter is not marked as tunable() despite matching grid
#660 opened Apr 4, 2023 by hfrick
1
helper for bridging causal fits
#652 opened Mar 24, 2023 by simonpcouch
1
Option to run grid_tune() and other long-running tidymodels processes as a RStudio or Workbench Job feature a feature request or enhancement
#651 opened Mar 23, 2023 by jthomasmock
Error in dplyr's UseMethod("filter") : no applicable method for 'filter' applied to an object of class "NULL"
#632 opened Mar 8, 2023 by yusuftengriverdi
4
improve inherited argument docs
#622 opened Feb 24, 2023 by topepo
Suggestion: Examples of using nested resampling for hyperparameter tuning documentation
#611 opened Feb 13, 2023 by MxNl
2
[Feature Request] Allow the user to collect_metrics exactly instead of simply averaging discussion feature a feature request or enhancement
#607 opened Feb 3, 2023 by BenoitLondon
6
Hard-to-understand error message with CV and missing data bug an unexpected problem or unintended behavior feature a feature request or enhancement
#592 opened Dec 9, 2022 by trevorcampbell
4
logistic regression with glmnet engine when penalty = 0
#591 opened Dec 9, 2022 by GilHenriques
helper for collecting glmnet coefficients
#582 opened Nov 28, 2022 by simonpcouch
Issue with coord_obs_pred() on log scale bug an unexpected problem or unintended behavior
#542 opened Sep 16, 2022 by kevin199011
1
Inconsistent handling of nonlinear formula by parsnip::fit() and tune::fit_resamples()
#534 opened Aug 15, 2022 by misken
1
select_by_*() silently ignores ordering selection if it is set as a string
#530 opened Jul 26, 2022 by EmilHvitfeldt
1
1
Is there a way to get (specific columns of the) modeled data for metric calculations?
#522 opened Jun 30, 2022 by mikemahoney218
1
PR: Generalizing the submodels framework for allowing multiple (sub-)parameters
#502 opened May 28, 2022 by franzbischoff
add tune_race methods for select_* functions
#490 opened May 9, 2022 by EmilHvitfeldt
Output results even if computation of some metrics fails feature a feature request or enhancement
#461 opened Feb 27, 2022 by abichat
1
move to testthat edition 3 upkeep maintenance, infrastructure, and similar
#454 opened Feb 22, 2022 by EmilHvitfeldt
1
Allow finalize to work on a recipe / workflow so that ID columns can be handled feature a feature request or enhancement
#411 opened Sep 16, 2021 by py9mrg
2
I need a solution. error:'Some tuning parameters require finalization but there are recipe parameters that require tuning' documentation
#387 opened Jun 23, 2021 by amazongodman
3
Add alt text to autoplot methods feature a feature request or enhancement
#380 opened May 19, 2021 by juliasilge
Create an outcome_names() method for objects produced by workflow_variables() feature a feature request or enhancement
#391 opened Apr 16, 2021 by topepo
ProTip! Type g p on any issue or pull request to go back to the pull request listing page.