Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

distinct() should support .keep_all = TRUE #756

Closed
mgirlich opened this issue Jan 18, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #757
Closed

distinct() should support .keep_all = TRUE #756

mgirlich opened this issue Jan 18, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #757

Comments

@mgirlich
Copy link
Collaborator

Currently not supported but can be done quite nicely with existing dplyr verbs.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Support distinct(.keep_all = TRUE) tidyverse/dbplyr
1 participant
@mgirlich