New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
purrr:contains and dplyr::contains is likely to cause confusion #217
Comments
@lionel- any thoughts on a better name? We might need to consider more prefixes for purrr functions since it's going to be loaded increasingly commonly |
we could prefix with |
|
this makes me think that the tidyverse is starting to look like Emacs lisp functions ;) Elisp doesn't have namespaces so all function names have to be prefixed.
I'm not sure, this is a wrapper around
ah nice, I was stuck with |
Or just change one of the verbs to |
Yes, confusion caused.
|
And similarly for |
See tidyverse/purrr#217. This will be fixed in the next release.
See tidyverse/purrr#217. This will be fixed in the next release.
Why did |
Both
purrr
anddplyr
have a contains() function, but with different syntax.For example, if I load dplyr first, and purr afterwards, it will bite me:
May it would be helpful to disambiguate the two functions?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: