Skip to content

Attach lubridate #157

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
hammer opened this issue Sep 29, 2018 · 5 comments · Fixed by #306
Closed

Attach lubridate #157

hammer opened this issue Sep 29, 2018 · 5 comments · Fixed by #306
Labels
feature a feature request or enhancement

Comments

@hammer
Copy link

hammer commented Sep 29, 2018

From @hadley on the RStudio Discourse in January 2018:

The real question is why isn’t lubridate in core? The answer is that it currently conflicts (in a narrow sense) with too many base functions - in practice the lubridate functions extend or wrap the base alternatives so the conflict aren’t harmful in practice, but I haven’t had time to think through how this should be indicated in the tidyverse loading screen.

Figured I'd file an issue on GitHub in case there's any loading screen progress to track (that could perhaps be linked to this issue).

@hadley
Copy link
Member

hadley commented Oct 1, 2018

This has two components:

@mdancho84
Copy link

I second this request: lubridate is critical for working with date and datetime just as stringr is essential for working with chr and forcats is for fct. This would be a good change for many people that routinely work with timestamp data.

@PAMorin

This comment has been minimized.

@batpigandme

This comment has been minimized.

@hadley hadley added the feature a feature request or enhancement label May 10, 2019
@hadley hadley changed the title Add lubridate Attach lubridate May 10, 2019
@hadley
Copy link
Member

hadley commented Nov 18, 2019

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature a feature request or enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants