*: add Makefile for msc

[rleungx]

Signed-off-by: Ryan Leung rleungx@gmail.com

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: Ref #5851.

What is changed and how does it work?

Let make check work for msc.

Check List

Tests

• Unit test

Release note

None

[ti-chi-bot]

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

• nolouch

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 74.91% // Head: 75.63% // Increases project coverage by +0.72% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (cc84857) compared to base (364a1e1).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

❗ Current head cc84857 differs from pull request most recent head 6f3db0a. Consider uploading reports for the commit 6f3db0a to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5856      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   74.91%   75.63%   +0.72%     
==========================================
  Files         335      337       +2     
  Lines       34094    34137      +43     
==========================================
+ Hits        25540    25819     +279     
+ Misses       6359     6101     -258     
- Partials     2195     2217      +22     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	75.63% <ø> (+0.72%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
server/tso/tso.go	65.73% <0.00%> (-5.62%)	⬇️
pkg/dashboard/adapter/manager.go	77.01% <0.00%> (-4.60%)	⬇️
tools/pd-ctl/pdctl/command/operator.go	66.66% <0.00%> (-1.15%)	⬇️
server/region_syncer/server.go	81.86% <0.00%> (-1.10%)	⬇️
pkg/member/member.go	64.21% <0.00%> (-1.06%)	⬇️
server/schedulers/evict_leader.go	78.57% <0.00%> (-0.90%)	⬇️
server/handler.go	52.88% <0.00%> (-0.39%)	⬇️
server/cluster/unsafe_recovery_controller.go	78.70% <0.00%> (-0.35%)	⬇️
server/region_syncer/client.go	86.56% <0.00%> (ø)
pkg/mcs/resource_manager/server/install/install.go	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 23 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[lhy1024]

The rest lgtm

[lhy1024]

why remove it?

[rleungx]

We don't use it.

[rleungx]

I'm going to merge this PR. I have no idea why there are two approve but only get one LGTM label.

[rleungx]

/merge

[ti-chi-bot]

@rleungx: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests:

/run-all-tests

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

[ti-chi-bot]

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: fb48c14

[rleungx]

/merge

[ti-chi-bot]

@rleungx: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests:

/run-all-tests

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

[ti-chi-bot]

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: a384bd4