Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

copr: Add test for enum/set support on First aggr #9135

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Nov 30, 2020

Conversation

Xuanwo
Copy link
Member

@Xuanwo Xuanwo commented Nov 27, 2020

Signed-off-by: Xuanwo github@xuanwo.io

What problem does this PR solve?

Add unit test for enum/set support on First aggr

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test

Release note

Signed-off-by: Xuanwo <github@xuanwo.io>
Signed-off-by: Xuanwo <github@xuanwo.io>
@ti-srebot ti-srebot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Nov 27, 2020
Signed-off-by: Xuanwo <github@xuanwo.io>
@skyzh skyzh self-requested a review November 27, 2020 09:58
Signed-off-by: Xuanwo <github@xuanwo.io>
@skyzh
Copy link
Member

skyzh commented Nov 30, 2020

/rebuild

@andylokandy
Copy link
Contributor

/run-all-tests

@ti-srebot ti-srebot removed the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Nov 30, 2020
@ti-srebot ti-srebot added the status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. label Nov 30, 2020
@skyzh skyzh added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Nov 30, 2020
@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor

Your auto merge job has been accepted, waiting for:

  • 6290

@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor

/run-all-tests

@ti-srebot ti-srebot merged commit 74cdb13 into tikv:master Nov 30, 2020
@Xuanwo Xuanwo deleted the enum-aggr branch November 30, 2020 09:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants