Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

timescale-ha multiarch (ARM/Aarch64) support #259

Closed
SharkWipf opened this issue May 2, 2022 · 23 comments
Closed

timescale-ha multiarch (ARM/Aarch64) support #259

SharkWipf opened this issue May 2, 2022 · 23 comments

Comments

@SharkWipf
Copy link

SharkWipf commented May 2, 2022

While the main timescaledb image has multiarch support, and attempts have been made (timescale/timescaledb-docker#23, timescale/timescaledb-docker#145) to provide multiarch support for the timescaledb-postgis image, since its deprecation, its recommended replacement, timescaledb-ha, does not offer multiarch support.
Is there a chance of getting arm/v7 and Aarch64 support on these images?

@svenklemm svenklemm transferred this issue from timescale/timescaledb-docker May 26, 2022
@saibotk
Copy link

saibotk commented Jun 21, 2022

To give another great reason for this:
This would also make development with timescaledb on ARM-based macs much faster.

Thank you for the amazing software!

@simonfester
Copy link

+1 for this feature, would allow me to use ARM based EC2 instances - which are cheaper!

@jason-lindholm
Copy link

+1

@amchelmer
Copy link

+1

@sinsharat
Copy link

Any support planned for this. As i see this issue was raised in May2022.

@ghstahl
Copy link

ghstahl commented Feb 17, 2023

It looks like someone is thinking about it.

arm64) rustArch='aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu'; rustupSha256='e189948e396d47254103a49c987e7fb0e5dd8e34b200aa4481ecc4b8e41fb929' ;; \

@sruehl
Copy link

sruehl commented Feb 24, 2023

maybe this #355 brings that a bit closer... It contains traces of ARM too :D

@romulus-ai
Copy link

+1 to may have this amazing software running on arm in the future :)

@titus-zx
Copy link

titus-zx commented Aug 7, 2023

+ 1 waiting on this

@yerffejytnac
Copy link

+1 would love to hear any updates on this

@sruehl
Copy link

sruehl commented Aug 11, 2023

@graveland mentioned in #355 that

This also adds most of the required support for arm64 builds as well, but we need to
fix public arm64 build runners before fully building multiplatform images

is there a issue for that to follow? As long as those runners are not fixed I guess there won't be images then.

@johanatan
Copy link

+1

@maheee
Copy link

maheee commented Oct 7, 2023

Would love to have that as well. I want to run it on a RaspberryPi.

In the meantime, I'm using an image starting with postgres and install timescaledb + toolkit myself:

https://gist.github.com/maheee/309641ce45a511bc61dd12b1eb10c55e

@tkononowiczsolwit
Copy link

+1 any chance it will work?

@b-thiswatch
Copy link

if you care for a temporary solution, you could use the dev repository... https://hub.docker.com/u/timescaledev

@jackson-sandland
Copy link

+1

@terion-name
Copy link

+1

@luckylinux
Copy link

luckylinux commented Mar 23, 2024

I have to do before all of this the following, since I am using Podman, not Docker:

ln -s /usr/bin/podman /usr/bin/docker

Then it should be about as easy as:

git clone https://github.com/timescale/timescaledb-docker-ha.git
PLATFORM="arm64" make build

Seems a bit weird that it's not included in automated builds by default though ...

@wuast94
Copy link

wuast94 commented Apr 2, 2024

any news on this?

@liefra
Copy link

liefra commented Apr 5, 2024

Then it should be about as easy as:

git clone https://github.com/timescale/timescaledb-docker-ha.git
PLATFORM="arm64" make build

Seems a bit weird that it's not included in automated builds by default though ...

This worked for me on Mac using Docker

@Oidlichtnwoada
Copy link

@feikesteenbergen Could you add the proposed ARM build to your configured CI/CD, this would help timescale adaption ...

@graveland
Copy link
Collaborator

Should be fixed as of #456

@Oidlichtnwoada
Copy link

Thank you so much @graveland @feikesteenbergen

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests