New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Please remove mitsuhiko/* #127

Closed
mitsuhiko opened this Issue Oct 20, 2014 · 110 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
@mitsuhiko

Please remove my repositories from the website and do not add a way to add them again. I do not value third party websites gameifying my projects.

@alexandrz

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@alexandrz

alexandrz Oct 21, 2014

Member

Now, we can't remove repositories from the list, but you can turn off notifications for your projects and put a message saying you don't like this way of funding on your projects pages. ( like here https://tip4commit.com/github/django/django ) Would it be enough?

You can find your projects here https://tip4commit.com/projects/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&query=mitsuhiko&order=balance (nobody has funded them yet)

Member

alexandrz commented Oct 21, 2014

Now, we can't remove repositories from the list, but you can turn off notifications for your projects and put a message saying you don't like this way of funding on your projects pages. ( like here https://tip4commit.com/github/django/django ) Would it be enough?

You can find your projects here https://tip4commit.com/projects/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&query=mitsuhiko&order=balance (nobody has funded them yet)

@mitsuhiko

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@mitsuhiko

mitsuhiko Oct 21, 2014

I'm not at all okay with what you guys are doing, just for the record. The only reason I discovered this is because someone forked your project and on another website money was accumulated. They did find a way to disable it: sigmike#110

Would it be enough?

No. Not at all. Please add support for blacklisting projects. I do not want to be associated with this kind of thing.

I'm not at all okay with what you guys are doing, just for the record. The only reason I discovered this is because someone forked your project and on another website money was accumulated. They did find a way to disable it: sigmike#110

Would it be enough?

No. Not at all. Please add support for blacklisting projects. I do not want to be associated with this kind of thing.

@arsenische

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@arsenische

arsenische Oct 21, 2014

Contributor

@mitsuhiko thanks for your feedback but you are not asociated with this (if some site publishes info about your projects that doesn't mean you are associated with it).

Please add support for blacklisting projects.

Could you please explain the motivation behind this requested feature?

We are doing the following:

  1. we distribute the public information about opensource projects and their contributors
  2. we enable anybody to tip contributors of these projects

What is wrong with it?

Contributor

arsenische commented Oct 21, 2014

@mitsuhiko thanks for your feedback but you are not asociated with this (if some site publishes info about your projects that doesn't mean you are associated with it).

Please add support for blacklisting projects.

Could you please explain the motivation behind this requested feature?

We are doing the following:

  1. we distribute the public information about opensource projects and their contributors
  2. we enable anybody to tip contributors of these projects

What is wrong with it?

@untitaker

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@untitaker

untitaker Oct 22, 2014

You are collecting money using the project's name.

You are collecting money using the project's name.

@untitaker

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@untitaker

untitaker Oct 22, 2014

Furthermore you're notifying new contributors about the possibility to recieve money for their commit as soon as their pull requests are merged. In your current notification emails there is no implication that this might be a process not endorsed by the project maintainers -- in fact, your terse messages make people assume tip4commit was explicitly set up and endorsed by the maintainers, because nobody assumes an unendorsed third-party service would send such intrusive messages on their own.

Furthermore you're notifying new contributors about the possibility to recieve money for their commit as soon as their pull requests are merged. In your current notification emails there is no implication that this might be a process not endorsed by the project maintainers -- in fact, your terse messages make people assume tip4commit was explicitly set up and endorsed by the maintainers, because nobody assumes an unendorsed third-party service would send such intrusive messages on their own.

@arsenische

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@arsenische

arsenische Oct 22, 2014

Contributor

Thanks for your coments, @untitaker . I think I understand the problem now.

The main problem is that some people might think that we organize crowdfunding process on behalf of project maintainers.

But we don't claim we do, that is an unintendend consequence of how we designed the system, sorry if it caused troubles.

Do you think it can be fixed by just explicitly stating that we are not affiliated with the project we collect funds for and that project maintainers might not endorse this practice?

Contributor

arsenische commented Oct 22, 2014

Thanks for your coments, @untitaker . I think I understand the problem now.

The main problem is that some people might think that we organize crowdfunding process on behalf of project maintainers.

But we don't claim we do, that is an unintendend consequence of how we designed the system, sorry if it caused troubles.

Do you think it can be fixed by just explicitly stating that we are not affiliated with the project we collect funds for and that project maintainers might not endorse this practice?

@untitaker

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@untitaker

untitaker Oct 22, 2014

That would certainly fix one problem, but of course i can't speak for @mitsuhiko. IIRC it was also not obvious in those messages whether the user would recieve more emails for further commits, or if there is any action at all needed to opt out of all of this.

But nevertheless i think tip4commit should be opt-in instead, because i consider the current tactic to be a very intrusive form of growth-hacking.

That would certainly fix one problem, but of course i can't speak for @mitsuhiko. IIRC it was also not obvious in those messages whether the user would recieve more emails for further commits, or if there is any action at all needed to opt out of all of this.

But nevertheless i think tip4commit should be opt-in instead, because i consider the current tactic to be a very intrusive form of growth-hacking.

@arsenische

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@arsenische

arsenische Oct 22, 2014

Contributor

Email notification happens only when contributor's balance hits the threshold of 0.005 btc (that is ~2$ at current rate). Recepient needs to know that s/he received money at least once so that s/he specifies his/her bitcoin address to receive them without notification in future. And of course it is easy to unsubscribe. See https://github.com/tip4commit/tip4commit/blob/master/app/models/tip.rb#L115-L118 for details.

Contributor

arsenische commented Oct 22, 2014

Email notification happens only when contributor's balance hits the threshold of 0.005 btc (that is ~2$ at current rate). Recepient needs to know that s/he received money at least once so that s/he specifies his/her bitcoin address to receive them without notification in future. And of course it is easy to unsubscribe. See https://github.com/tip4commit/tip4commit/blob/master/app/models/tip.rb#L115-L118 for details.

@mitsuhiko

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@mitsuhiko

mitsuhiko Oct 25, 2014

Can you please remove the projects? Can't be that hard to do. I really do not see much that should be discussed about this issue.

Can you please remove the projects? Can't be that hard to do. I really do not see much that should be discussed about this issue.

@arsenische

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@arsenische

arsenische Oct 25, 2014

Contributor

@mitsuhiko, everybody who visits pages devoted to your projects (https://tip4commit.com/github/mitsuhiko/werkzeug and https://tip4commit.com/github/mitsuhiko/flask) now sees a big red warning and hopefully understands that you are not affiliated with tip4commit.

Somebody added your projects to our database, I don't see much sense in removing them since anybody can add them back. Perhaps there should be a "black list" that prevents certain projects from being added. But I am not yet sure if we should develop this feature since motivation is not clear to me.

Why should we forbid people to send bitcoin donations to support open source project development or to receive donations for commiting to it?

I agree that it would be nice to explicitly warn users that we are not affiliated with project maintainers (to prevent confusion as @untitaker said). But currently it is quite obvious for the mentioned projects due to the warnings. Are your concerns resolved?

Contributor

arsenische commented Oct 25, 2014

@mitsuhiko, everybody who visits pages devoted to your projects (https://tip4commit.com/github/mitsuhiko/werkzeug and https://tip4commit.com/github/mitsuhiko/flask) now sees a big red warning and hopefully understands that you are not affiliated with tip4commit.

Somebody added your projects to our database, I don't see much sense in removing them since anybody can add them back. Perhaps there should be a "black list" that prevents certain projects from being added. But I am not yet sure if we should develop this feature since motivation is not clear to me.

Why should we forbid people to send bitcoin donations to support open source project development or to receive donations for commiting to it?

I agree that it would be nice to explicitly warn users that we are not affiliated with project maintainers (to prevent confusion as @untitaker said). But currently it is quite obvious for the mentioned projects due to the warnings. Are your concerns resolved?

@mitsuhiko

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@mitsuhiko

mitsuhiko Oct 25, 2014

Why should we prevent people from sending bitcoin donations to open source project and from receiving donations for commiting to it?

Because people don't want them. Any donation that comes to me for instance I need to declare in my taxes and I need to provide information about where that is coming from. Accepting money at random is not exactly making my life easier especially when it comes out of things like bitcoin.

But aside from that, there are channels in which projects can be supported and those projects usually open them up themselves. Having random websites on the internet collect money on project's behalf is not okay in my book.

Instead of just subscribing projects make marketing and let projects sign up. That's what gittip does, that's how patreon do etc. And they also come with support for dealing with the paperwork.

Are your concerns resolved?
I can already see that this is an downhill battle so I will just accept the current proposed solution …

Why should we prevent people from sending bitcoin donations to open source project and from receiving donations for commiting to it?

Because people don't want them. Any donation that comes to me for instance I need to declare in my taxes and I need to provide information about where that is coming from. Accepting money at random is not exactly making my life easier especially when it comes out of things like bitcoin.

But aside from that, there are channels in which projects can be supported and those projects usually open them up themselves. Having random websites on the internet collect money on project's behalf is not okay in my book.

Instead of just subscribing projects make marketing and let projects sign up. That's what gittip does, that's how patreon do etc. And they also come with support for dealing with the paperwork.

Are your concerns resolved?
I can already see that this is an downhill battle so I will just accept the current proposed solution …

@mitsuhiko mitsuhiko closed this Oct 25, 2014

@bill-auger

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@bill-auger

bill-auger Oct 25, 2014

Contributor

this sounds like a feature request to me - here are some suggestions for features that could be added to tip4commit

  • only the repo owner or organization admins could be allowed to register their projects on tip4commit
  • there could be a "remove project and withdraw funds" feature accessible only to the repo owner or organization admins
  • individual users could opt out of receiving tips and tip4commit could publish this voluntary blacklist so that project maintainers could reject contributions from anyone who is not on that list - bear in mind that receiving tips is already on an opt-in basis - one must register a bitcoin address with tip4commit before any funds will be transfered

but regardless of any of these features - if the project source code is publicly available under a standard open source license than it is obviously not possible (not technically nor legally) to prevent someone from cloning such a project and giving tips for contributions to their clone - contributions from which the original repo would not benefit - unless the author crafts a more restrictive license that specifically discourages rewarding contributions they have not much to say on the matter

keep in mind that tip4commit is itself an open source project and someone would need to take the time to implement these features - the OP is so far the only person who desires such features so perhaps the OP would care to implement some of them

Contributor

bill-auger commented Oct 25, 2014

this sounds like a feature request to me - here are some suggestions for features that could be added to tip4commit

  • only the repo owner or organization admins could be allowed to register their projects on tip4commit
  • there could be a "remove project and withdraw funds" feature accessible only to the repo owner or organization admins
  • individual users could opt out of receiving tips and tip4commit could publish this voluntary blacklist so that project maintainers could reject contributions from anyone who is not on that list - bear in mind that receiving tips is already on an opt-in basis - one must register a bitcoin address with tip4commit before any funds will be transfered

but regardless of any of these features - if the project source code is publicly available under a standard open source license than it is obviously not possible (not technically nor legally) to prevent someone from cloning such a project and giving tips for contributions to their clone - contributions from which the original repo would not benefit - unless the author crafts a more restrictive license that specifically discourages rewarding contributions they have not much to say on the matter

keep in mind that tip4commit is itself an open source project and someone would need to take the time to implement these features - the OP is so far the only person who desires such features so perhaps the OP would care to implement some of them

@apollo13

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@apollo13

apollo13 Oct 25, 2014

the OP is so far the only person who desires such features so perhaps the OP would care to implement some of them

No, the OP isn't the only one, the Django project would be another one. And your suggestion that we should implement those features to not get spammed or affiliated with sites we don't want to be affiliated seems like a bad joke to me.

the OP is so far the only person who desires such features so perhaps the OP would care to implement some of them

No, the OP isn't the only one, the Django project would be another one. And your suggestion that we should implement those features to not get spammed or affiliated with sites we don't want to be affiliated seems like a bad joke to me.

@bill-auger

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@bill-auger

bill-auger Oct 25, 2014

Contributor

im just saying someone has to do it and that wont happen unless it is clearly a desirable feature - i would work on it myself if i thought it would be generally appreciated - which is why i framed the issue as a feature request

Contributor

bill-auger commented Oct 25, 2014

im just saying someone has to do it and that wont happen unless it is clearly a desirable feature - i would work on it myself if i thought it would be generally appreciated - which is why i framed the issue as a feature request

@arsenische

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@arsenische

arsenische Oct 25, 2014

Contributor

I think people should be free to organize themselves if they like to. Project maintainers' involvement shouldn't be required nor is expected.

Project maintainers or developers don't really need to receive tips if they don't want to. If tips are unclaimed during 30 days, they get returned to the funded project's balance (i. e. back to the donations pool). That's already implemented.

I agree that people souldn't be spammed. Notification threshold is also already implemented and can be raised if needed, users don't receive emails for microdonations anymore.

What needs to be done is we should explicitly state that we are not affiliated with project maintainers in our emails and on the site.

Contributor

arsenische commented Oct 25, 2014

I think people should be free to organize themselves if they like to. Project maintainers' involvement shouldn't be required nor is expected.

Project maintainers or developers don't really need to receive tips if they don't want to. If tips are unclaimed during 30 days, they get returned to the funded project's balance (i. e. back to the donations pool). That's already implemented.

I agree that people souldn't be spammed. Notification threshold is also already implemented and can be raised if needed, users don't receive emails for microdonations anymore.

What needs to be done is we should explicitly state that we are not affiliated with project maintainers in our emails and on the site.

@apollo13

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@apollo13

apollo13 Oct 25, 2014

I agree that people souldn't be spammed. Notification threshold is also already implemented and can be raised if needed, users don't receive emails for microdonations anymore.

You still choose to ignore the fact that sending emails without prior consent in a system like yours is illegal in many countries. Treshholds or not, you are just waiting till someone is annoyed enough to sue you.

I agree that people souldn't be spammed. Notification threshold is also already implemented and can be raised if needed, users don't receive emails for microdonations anymore.

You still choose to ignore the fact that sending emails without prior consent in a system like yours is illegal in many countries. Treshholds or not, you are just waiting till someone is annoyed enough to sue you.

@arsenische

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@arsenische

arsenische Oct 25, 2014

Contributor

Frankly speaking I am not quite familiar with laws of many countries nor I have enough money to hire a bunch of international lawyers. Do I need to learn all the laws of all the countries before publishing anything online or may I just use the common sense and conscience please?

Contributor

arsenische commented Oct 25, 2014

Frankly speaking I am not quite familiar with laws of many countries nor I have enough money to hire a bunch of international lawyers. Do I need to learn all the laws of all the countries before publishing anything online or may I just use the common sense and conscience please?

@apollo13

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@apollo13

apollo13 Oct 25, 2014

Frankly speaking you can publish anything (well, most things) online, but as soon as you send unsolicited emails you have to bother with laws.

Frankly speaking you can publish anything (well, most things) online, but as soon as you send unsolicited emails you have to bother with laws.

@arsenische

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@arsenische

arsenische Oct 25, 2014

Contributor

I don't think unsolicited email is the right term for the situation when somebody sent you a tip (otherwise that term would apply to any invitation to any social network, for example).

AFAIK in my country there is no legislation of email. If you could point me to the particular law I should conform, I would be thankful.

Contributor

arsenische commented Oct 25, 2014

I don't think unsolicited email is the right term for the situation when somebody sent you a tip (otherwise that term would apply to any invitation to any social network, for example).

AFAIK in my country there is no legislation of email. If you could point me to the particular law I should conform, I would be thankful.

@mitsuhiko

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@mitsuhiko

mitsuhiko Oct 25, 2014

Do I need to learn all the laws of all the countries before publishing anything online or may I just use the common sense and conscience please?

To be honest: when it comes to handling money I would assume so. If this website would be dealing with a real world currency you would have a bunch of problems on yourself at this point. Most people would avoid holding funds on their books for an unlimited amount of time.

Don't build software you have to opt-out of and you have a lot less problems on your hand. Right now, this is dangerously close to being sued by someone.

Do I need to learn all the laws of all the countries before publishing anything online or may I just use the common sense and conscience please?

To be honest: when it comes to handling money I would assume so. If this website would be dealing with a real world currency you would have a bunch of problems on yourself at this point. Most people would avoid holding funds on their books for an unlimited amount of time.

Don't build software you have to opt-out of and you have a lot less problems on your hand. Right now, this is dangerously close to being sued by someone.

@arsenische

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@arsenische

arsenische Oct 25, 2014

Contributor

That's why this kind of project is hardly possible with traditional money. This project was created during a 48 hour rails rumble competition. The beauty of Bitcoin is that everybody can use it to create something during a weekend.

This is not a commercial project, we don't have resources to hire lawyers and accountants. And of course we don't want to harm anybody. If we see that we are damaging somebody, we'll try to fix it.

Update: It is already opt-out for everybody unless s/he receives a tip greater than threshold.
Update2: If people receive tips greater than threshold and complain - we'll rise a threshold. We are not sending endless emails to random people. I think if a person received a tip - s/he should have a chance to know about it.

Why would anybody want to sue us?

Thanks for your warnings anyway (though I am not yet sure how to deal with them).

Contributor

arsenische commented Oct 25, 2014

That's why this kind of project is hardly possible with traditional money. This project was created during a 48 hour rails rumble competition. The beauty of Bitcoin is that everybody can use it to create something during a weekend.

This is not a commercial project, we don't have resources to hire lawyers and accountants. And of course we don't want to harm anybody. If we see that we are damaging somebody, we'll try to fix it.

Update: It is already opt-out for everybody unless s/he receives a tip greater than threshold.
Update2: If people receive tips greater than threshold and complain - we'll rise a threshold. We are not sending endless emails to random people. I think if a person received a tip - s/he should have a chance to know about it.

Why would anybody want to sue us?

Thanks for your warnings anyway (though I am not yet sure how to deal with them).

@arsenische

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@arsenische

arsenische Oct 25, 2014

Contributor

opened #136 to address at least one of the problems so far

Contributor

arsenische commented Oct 25, 2014

opened #136 to address at least one of the problems so far

@freakboy3742

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@freakboy3742

freakboy3742 Oct 25, 2014

I'll second everything that has been said by @mitsuhiko and @apollo13 in this thread.

  • You're collecting money on our behalf (for various values of "our"), without our permission.
  • You're talking to our contributors and teasing them with promises of money for their work.
  • You're proposing to deliver this money to us without any concern for how we'll receive it, or how we'll account for it in our tax returns (are you going to issue a 1099 for US recipients? Or a group certificate for AU recipients?).
  • You haven't taken any consideration for how money interacts with the commit process itself - a 1 line typo fix is valued the same as a 2000 line fix correcting a criticial transaction behavior in a database.
  • Every time we commit a typo fix, our inbox is spammed by a bunch of emails (instead of, say, accumulating in an account and sending a monthly account statement).
  • And, making the whole thing laughable, all this is being done to tell us that we've accumulated micro-cents of real money.

While I'm sure you're doing this with the best of intentions, I have a great deal of difficulty finding anything about this program that isn't either offensive or laughably naïve.

I'll second everything that has been said by @mitsuhiko and @apollo13 in this thread.

  • You're collecting money on our behalf (for various values of "our"), without our permission.
  • You're talking to our contributors and teasing them with promises of money for their work.
  • You're proposing to deliver this money to us without any concern for how we'll receive it, or how we'll account for it in our tax returns (are you going to issue a 1099 for US recipients? Or a group certificate for AU recipients?).
  • You haven't taken any consideration for how money interacts with the commit process itself - a 1 line typo fix is valued the same as a 2000 line fix correcting a criticial transaction behavior in a database.
  • Every time we commit a typo fix, our inbox is spammed by a bunch of emails (instead of, say, accumulating in an account and sending a monthly account statement).
  • And, making the whole thing laughable, all this is being done to tell us that we've accumulated micro-cents of real money.

While I'm sure you're doing this with the best of intentions, I have a great deal of difficulty finding anything about this program that isn't either offensive or laughably naïve.

@arsenische

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@arsenische

arsenische Oct 25, 2014

Contributor

@freakboy3742 thanks for your feedback, every comment adds significance to this thread, but have you even read it before posting?

You're collecting money on our behalf (for various values of "our"), without our permission.

No, we are not collecting money on anyone's behalf. We are not affiliated with project owners. Sorry if it confused anybody, we'll fix it in #136

You're talking to our contributors and teasing them with promises of money for their work.

We are talking only to contributors that already got some tips.

You're proposing to deliver this money to us without any concern for how we'll receive it, or how we'll account for it in our tax returns (are you going to issue a 1099 for US recipients? Or a group certificate for AU recipients?).

That are small amount tips in Bitcoin, do they even need to be declared? If it were Linden dollars, would they need to be declared too? Recipients don't have to claim the money if they don't want it, I've mentioned it already.

You haven't taken any consideration for how money interacts with the commit process itself - a 1 line typo fix is valued the same as a 2000 line fix correcting a criticial transaction behavior in a database.

We don't pay for work, we just distribute a little gratuity from people who want to support the project and possibly attract more attention to it. If the commit is uselsess - don't accept it. If it is useful - why would you care if the contributor received anything for it or not?

Every time we commit a typo fix, our inbox is spammed by a bunch of emails (instead of, say, accumulating in an account and sending a monthly account statement).

That's not what tip4commit does. We don't spam bunch of emails. It's pretty rear event when we send out an email, see https://github.com/tip4commit/tip4commit/blob/master/app/models/tip.rb#L115-L118 for details.

And, making the whole thing laughable, all this is being done to tell us that we've accumulated micro-cents of real money.

This problem has been solved. No notifications about micro-cents anymore.

Well, yes, this project might seem naive, but offensive? Perhaps we made some mistakes that offended people and are sorry for that. But we worked to solve that. It is normal that not all the people like the idea. But I hardly see how it can be offensive.

Contributor

arsenische commented Oct 25, 2014

@freakboy3742 thanks for your feedback, every comment adds significance to this thread, but have you even read it before posting?

You're collecting money on our behalf (for various values of "our"), without our permission.

No, we are not collecting money on anyone's behalf. We are not affiliated with project owners. Sorry if it confused anybody, we'll fix it in #136

You're talking to our contributors and teasing them with promises of money for their work.

We are talking only to contributors that already got some tips.

You're proposing to deliver this money to us without any concern for how we'll receive it, or how we'll account for it in our tax returns (are you going to issue a 1099 for US recipients? Or a group certificate for AU recipients?).

That are small amount tips in Bitcoin, do they even need to be declared? If it were Linden dollars, would they need to be declared too? Recipients don't have to claim the money if they don't want it, I've mentioned it already.

You haven't taken any consideration for how money interacts with the commit process itself - a 1 line typo fix is valued the same as a 2000 line fix correcting a criticial transaction behavior in a database.

We don't pay for work, we just distribute a little gratuity from people who want to support the project and possibly attract more attention to it. If the commit is uselsess - don't accept it. If it is useful - why would you care if the contributor received anything for it or not?

Every time we commit a typo fix, our inbox is spammed by a bunch of emails (instead of, say, accumulating in an account and sending a monthly account statement).

That's not what tip4commit does. We don't spam bunch of emails. It's pretty rear event when we send out an email, see https://github.com/tip4commit/tip4commit/blob/master/app/models/tip.rb#L115-L118 for details.

And, making the whole thing laughable, all this is being done to tell us that we've accumulated micro-cents of real money.

This problem has been solved. No notifications about micro-cents anymore.

Well, yes, this project might seem naive, but offensive? Perhaps we made some mistakes that offended people and are sorry for that. But we worked to solve that. It is normal that not all the people like the idea. But I hardly see how it can be offensive.

@evildmp

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@evildmp

evildmp Oct 25, 2014

@freakboy3742's last comment hits the nail on the head.

I am sure that your intentions are good, that you want to encourage positive things and that you want to do engage with people in a respectful way.

Unfortunately, the economics of this undermine that: being informed that I have earned a fraction of a US cent (not even a fraction of a dollar) for several hours' work is not actually encouraging, nor does it make me feel that my time or work are being valued.

Finally, despite your good intentions, and while I think that the rewards we receive for participating in open source software are real and very encouraging, I don't think that small monetary rewards of this sort are amongst them. It seems to be missing the point, at least of my own participation.

So sorry to pour cold water and discouragement on your good intentions, but I don't think that your programme works the way you hope, and I don't think it makes people feel the way you hope.

evildmp commented Oct 25, 2014

@freakboy3742's last comment hits the nail on the head.

I am sure that your intentions are good, that you want to encourage positive things and that you want to do engage with people in a respectful way.

Unfortunately, the economics of this undermine that: being informed that I have earned a fraction of a US cent (not even a fraction of a dollar) for several hours' work is not actually encouraging, nor does it make me feel that my time or work are being valued.

Finally, despite your good intentions, and while I think that the rewards we receive for participating in open source software are real and very encouraging, I don't think that small monetary rewards of this sort are amongst them. It seems to be missing the point, at least of my own participation.

So sorry to pour cold water and discouragement on your good intentions, but I don't think that your programme works the way you hope, and I don't think it makes people feel the way you hope.

@arsenische

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@arsenische

arsenische Oct 25, 2014

Contributor

@evildmp , thanks for your feedback, but as said above, we do NOT notify users on fractions of a US cent (or even US dollar). This was solved over a month ago. Min notification threshold is set to 0.005 btc, that is $1.75 at current rate, we might increase it if bitcoin continues to fall. Please accept apologies if you received such an email from us in the past.

Even though not everybody likes this project, there are many developers who find it useful and claim the tips.

Contributor

arsenische commented Oct 25, 2014

@evildmp , thanks for your feedback, but as said above, we do NOT notify users on fractions of a US cent (or even US dollar). This was solved over a month ago. Min notification threshold is set to 0.005 btc, that is $1.75 at current rate, we might increase it if bitcoin continues to fall. Please accept apologies if you received such an email from us in the past.

Even though not everybody likes this project, there are many developers who find it useful and claim the tips.

@Shahor

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@Shahor

Shahor Nov 1, 2014

This issue feels like listening to this again : https://soundcloud.com/ryan-block-10/comcastic-service

(And it's not good)

Please just respect people if they ask you to remove them from the project. Shouldn't be that hard.

Shahor commented Nov 1, 2014

This issue feels like listening to this again : https://soundcloud.com/ryan-block-10/comcastic-service

(And it's not good)

Please just respect people if they ask you to remove them from the project. Shouldn't be that hard.

@ajeffrey

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@ajeffrey

ajeffrey Nov 1, 2014

just FYI, this issue is currently on the front page of hacker news:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8542969

ajeffrey commented Nov 1, 2014

just FYI, this issue is currently on the front page of hacker news:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8542969

@boj

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@boj

boj Nov 1, 2014

@arsenische You really seem to be missing the point here. You are providing a service which inconveniences people (potential taxes), insults them (a few cents/dollars for hours of passionate work), spams them (emails for nothing more than a simple text update), and forcibly opting them into your service.

boj commented Nov 1, 2014

@arsenische You really seem to be missing the point here. You are providing a service which inconveniences people (potential taxes), insults them (a few cents/dollars for hours of passionate work), spams them (emails for nothing more than a simple text update), and forcibly opting them into your service.

@Malka

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@Malka

Malka Nov 1, 2014

Opting-in in ppl is meh. Refusing to opt them out is stupid. Enjoy your PR nightmare.

Malka commented Nov 1, 2014

Opting-in in ppl is meh. Refusing to opt them out is stupid. Enjoy your PR nightmare.

@ghost

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@ghost

ghost Nov 1, 2014

Just want to chime in that I think this project is great, and that anyone who takes an issue with it is overreacting. It's not that hard to block incoming email, especially since it's all sent from the same domain. This also seems a lot more reasonable than complaining about people wanting to gift you money for your work.

Unless tip4commit is somehow profiting from this I don't understand why this would be a problem.

ghost commented Nov 1, 2014

Just want to chime in that I think this project is great, and that anyone who takes an issue with it is overreacting. It's not that hard to block incoming email, especially since it's all sent from the same domain. This also seems a lot more reasonable than complaining about people wanting to gift you money for your work.

Unless tip4commit is somehow profiting from this I don't understand why this would be a problem.

@mence

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@mence

mence Nov 1, 2014

FWIW, in some tax jurisdictions, when you incur income or assets above a certain level, all income and assets must be declared regardless of their size. In Australia, bitcoins are treated like assets and so would have to be declared for capital gains on their disposal or usage.

mence commented Nov 1, 2014

FWIW, in some tax jurisdictions, when you incur income or assets above a certain level, all income and assets must be declared regardless of their size. In Australia, bitcoins are treated like assets and so would have to be declared for capital gains on their disposal or usage.

@csvan

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@csvan

csvan Nov 1, 2014

FYI this issue has been recently featured in YCombinators Hacker News. You may want to consider how it affects the public image of your project - reception so far has been overwhelmingly negative.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8542969

csvan commented Nov 1, 2014

FYI this issue has been recently featured in YCombinators Hacker News. You may want to consider how it affects the public image of your project - reception so far has been overwhelmingly negative.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8542969

@rapilabs

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@rapilabs

rapilabs Nov 1, 2014

This project is not great or clever in any way. It's not innovative, merely emulative. The fact that you willingly infuriate people by refusing to blacklist their projects indicates contempt for the people you're pretending to help.

rapilabs commented Nov 1, 2014

This project is not great or clever in any way. It's not innovative, merely emulative. The fact that you willingly infuriate people by refusing to blacklist their projects indicates contempt for the people you're pretending to help.

@benjamingr

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@benjamingr

benjamingr Nov 1, 2014

Just as a friendly tip - since this is on the top of HN now I strongly recommend you use the GitHub "Lock" feature in order to prevent this issue from spiraling out of relevance.

Just as a friendly tip - since this is on the top of HN now I strongly recommend you use the GitHub "Lock" feature in order to prevent this issue from spiraling out of relevance.

@benburwell

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@benburwell

benburwell Nov 1, 2014

Assuming that the owner and contributors of a project have no interest in using your service, where does donated money go? It seems rather presumptious to assume people want to use this, as has been made abundantly clear in this issue. The result: you collect money from people ostensibly donating to a project, and don't provide a way for owners to disable that.

Assuming that the owner and contributors of a project have no interest in using your service, where does donated money go? It seems rather presumptious to assume people want to use this, as has been made abundantly clear in this issue. The result: you collect money from people ostensibly donating to a project, and don't provide a way for owners to disable that.

@nathan-alden

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@nathan-alden

nathan-alden Nov 1, 2014

My bet is that the accrued unclaimed Bitcoin balance will magically "disappear" one day when they are "hacked."

My bet is that the accrued unclaimed Bitcoin balance will magically "disappear" one day when they are "hacked."

@Kunjan

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@Kunjan

Kunjan Nov 1, 2014

@arsenische Why is it difficult to filter certain projects upon request? It would have been a far better response than what you have got your project into.

Kunjan commented Nov 1, 2014

@arsenische Why is it difficult to filter certain projects upon request? It would have been a far better response than what you have got your project into.

@ebeckm

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@ebeckm

ebeckm Nov 1, 2014

The email aspect of what you do may be illegal under US law as a result of the CAN-SPAM act.

ebeckm commented Nov 1, 2014

The email aspect of what you do may be illegal under US law as a result of the CAN-SPAM act.

@bill-myers

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@bill-myers

bill-myers Nov 1, 2014

If Wikipedia is correct, there is no violation of CAN-SPAM.

From Wikipedia:
CAN-SPAM, a direct response of the growing number of complaints over spam e-mails,[6] defines a "commercial electronic mail message" as "any electronic mail message the primary purpose of which is the commercial advertisement or promotion of a commercial product or service (including content on an Internet website operated for a commercial purpose)."

Obviously, the primary purpose here is to give out the tip, not advertising the tip4commit service.

If Wikipedia is correct, there is no violation of CAN-SPAM.

From Wikipedia:
CAN-SPAM, a direct response of the growing number of complaints over spam e-mails,[6] defines a "commercial electronic mail message" as "any electronic mail message the primary purpose of which is the commercial advertisement or promotion of a commercial product or service (including content on an Internet website operated for a commercial purpose)."

Obviously, the primary purpose here is to give out the tip, not advertising the tip4commit service.

@csvan

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@csvan

csvan Nov 1, 2014

@arsenische seriously, just make the whole thing opt-in only and you will solve practically every problem you are currently getting flack for.

Your idea itself is great, but basically forcing it on developers is a terrible move. Don't do it simply because you may find the legal wiggle-room to do so, in the end it will just ruin the whole image of your project and undermine the good you wanted to achieve with it. Maintainers who want to get onboard with your programme will do so, and for everyone else you can just add a referral feature to notify them about the project and the possibility of joining it.

I for one do not think you have ill intentions with it, but public perception is everything when it comes to running projects which involve the work of people not directly affiliated with you.

csvan commented Nov 1, 2014

@arsenische seriously, just make the whole thing opt-in only and you will solve practically every problem you are currently getting flack for.

Your idea itself is great, but basically forcing it on developers is a terrible move. Don't do it simply because you may find the legal wiggle-room to do so, in the end it will just ruin the whole image of your project and undermine the good you wanted to achieve with it. Maintainers who want to get onboard with your programme will do so, and for everyone else you can just add a referral feature to notify them about the project and the possibility of joining it.

I for one do not think you have ill intentions with it, but public perception is everything when it comes to running projects which involve the work of people not directly affiliated with you.

@ebeckm

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@ebeckm

ebeckm Nov 1, 2014

@bill-myers please refer to the ftc website:

http://www.business.ftc.gov/documents/bus61-can-spam-act-compliance-guide-business

If the recipient has not opted in it may be considered commercial email.

ebeckm commented Nov 1, 2014

@bill-myers please refer to the ftc website:

http://www.business.ftc.gov/documents/bus61-can-spam-act-compliance-guide-business

If the recipient has not opted in it may be considered commercial email.

@BLKSwan

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@BLKSwan

BLKSwan Nov 1, 2014

Are people in this thread familiar with bountysource? They are doing the exact same thing:
https://www.bountysource.com/search?query=mitsuhiko

@csvan similar to the open source concept in general which allows for permission-less innovation, I see permission-less project funding as a central part of the Tip4Commit service. Making it "opt-in only" removes this. Why shouldn't a subsection of a project's contributors be able to use the service just because the maintainer doesn't like it?

BLKSwan commented Nov 1, 2014

Are people in this thread familiar with bountysource? They are doing the exact same thing:
https://www.bountysource.com/search?query=mitsuhiko

@csvan similar to the open source concept in general which allows for permission-less innovation, I see permission-less project funding as a central part of the Tip4Commit service. Making it "opt-in only" removes this. Why shouldn't a subsection of a project's contributors be able to use the service just because the maintainer doesn't like it?

@csvan

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@csvan

csvan Nov 1, 2014

@BLKSwan I think it boils down to a question of basic social ethics. Most people, I presume, would find the idea of others collecting donations for them, funnelled through a party they have not approved, completely without their consent, objectionable. Most projects already have their own donation schemes set up which they would like to refer their supporters to instead. Project maintainers who want to use a service such as tip4commit are perfectly able to sign up for it themselves.

That is only coming at it from a subjective angle though. There is a whole slew of possible legal implications, many of them laid out both on YC and the Bitcoin subreddit:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8542969
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2kz9x0/please_remove_mitsuhiko_this_guy_is_complaining/

csvan commented Nov 1, 2014

@BLKSwan I think it boils down to a question of basic social ethics. Most people, I presume, would find the idea of others collecting donations for them, funnelled through a party they have not approved, completely without their consent, objectionable. Most projects already have their own donation schemes set up which they would like to refer their supporters to instead. Project maintainers who want to use a service such as tip4commit are perfectly able to sign up for it themselves.

That is only coming at it from a subjective angle though. There is a whole slew of possible legal implications, many of them laid out both on YC and the Bitcoin subreddit:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8542969
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2kz9x0/please_remove_mitsuhiko_this_guy_is_complaining/

@jugimaster

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@jugimaster

jugimaster Nov 1, 2014

If Tip4Commit were genuinely innocent in this, with purely good intentions, it would be opt-in right from the start. But it's not. They're most likely trying to make money with this, and just being dishonest about it.

If Tip4Commit were genuinely innocent in this, with purely good intentions, it would be opt-in right from the start. But it's not. They're most likely trying to make money with this, and just being dishonest about it.

@csvan

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@csvan

csvan Nov 1, 2014

@Adohgg

Legal action is very unnecessary and it just seems like many are threatening it to scare Tip4Commit, yet they don't seem to be doing anything wrong.

We're getting off-topic here, but in some countries this is exactly the kind of abuse a poorly structured legal system allows. In some cases the very costs and risks associated with as much as defending against a highly dubious lawsuit may be so high that the defendant is forced to settle and just agree to shut down, even if they have not done anything wrong. That is why I find it so hard to like people who would rather just sick the lawyers on somebody rather than trying to have a reasoned debate and mutual settlement. It has everything to do with intimidation and nothing to do with actually wanting to see the right thing done.

csvan commented Nov 1, 2014

@Adohgg

Legal action is very unnecessary and it just seems like many are threatening it to scare Tip4Commit, yet they don't seem to be doing anything wrong.

We're getting off-topic here, but in some countries this is exactly the kind of abuse a poorly structured legal system allows. In some cases the very costs and risks associated with as much as defending against a highly dubious lawsuit may be so high that the defendant is forced to settle and just agree to shut down, even if they have not done anything wrong. That is why I find it so hard to like people who would rather just sick the lawyers on somebody rather than trying to have a reasoned debate and mutual settlement. It has everything to do with intimidation and nothing to do with actually wanting to see the right thing done.

@genbattle

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@genbattle

genbattle Nov 1, 2014

IANAL, but I believe emailing people without prior consent (opt-in) is illegal in the country I live in, as it is in many countries. You may also be running afoul of charity or tax laws.

For your own legal safety and the sake of the projects you are trying to support your service should be opt-in, just like other services of this type (gittip/gratipay), not opt-out. Plus I doubt repository hosting services such as Github will take kindly to you spamming their users or accepting donations of their behalf without permission.

IANAL, but I believe emailing people without prior consent (opt-in) is illegal in the country I live in, as it is in many countries. You may also be running afoul of charity or tax laws.

For your own legal safety and the sake of the projects you are trying to support your service should be opt-in, just like other services of this type (gittip/gratipay), not opt-out. Plus I doubt repository hosting services such as Github will take kindly to you spamming their users or accepting donations of their behalf without permission.

@BLKSwan

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@BLKSwan

BLKSwan Nov 1, 2014

@csvan I guess I don't understand why you're comfortable with anyone being able to copy your work but not comfortable with random strangers being able to pay people that contribute to your projects using Tip4Commit if they so choose. No one is being coerced into using the service, it's simply providing an option to those that would like to use it leveraging publicly available information from GitHub. There's even a disclaimer on the main page that notes "We are not affiliated with most of the projects, their owners might not endorse use of tip4commit"

BLKSwan commented Nov 1, 2014

@csvan I guess I don't understand why you're comfortable with anyone being able to copy your work but not comfortable with random strangers being able to pay people that contribute to your projects using Tip4Commit if they so choose. No one is being coerced into using the service, it's simply providing an option to those that would like to use it leveraging publicly available information from GitHub. There's even a disclaimer on the main page that notes "We are not affiliated with most of the projects, their owners might not endorse use of tip4commit"

@csvan

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@csvan

csvan Nov 1, 2014

@jugimaster - I agree about the opt-in part, I do not agree that it necessarily demonstrates ill intent. People should maintain good faith unless there is a sound basis to accuse them of fraud.

csvan commented Nov 1, 2014

@jugimaster - I agree about the opt-in part, I do not agree that it necessarily demonstrates ill intent. People should maintain good faith unless there is a sound basis to accuse them of fraud.

@csvan

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@csvan

csvan Nov 1, 2014

@BLKSwan if I place my software under a FOSS license, I am giving my explicit consent to others to copy, modify and distribute my work according to that license. I have not given them any kind of permission to raise money for my project without my consent, especially not through channels I have by no means approved.

csvan commented Nov 1, 2014

@BLKSwan if I place my software under a FOSS license, I am giving my explicit consent to others to copy, modify and distribute my work according to that license. I have not given them any kind of permission to raise money for my project without my consent, especially not through channels I have by no means approved.

@jugimaster

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@jugimaster

jugimaster Nov 1, 2014

@csvan - I didn't say "fraud", but I think they're probably trying to make money with this. Tip4Commit must have known that's exactly what the project owners would not want, which would explain why Tip4Commit didn't ask them.

But when the project owners do notice, Tip4Commit can tell everyone they were just trying to help. I'm not buying it.

@csvan - I didn't say "fraud", but I think they're probably trying to make money with this. Tip4Commit must have known that's exactly what the project owners would not want, which would explain why Tip4Commit didn't ask them.

But when the project owners do notice, Tip4Commit can tell everyone they were just trying to help. I'm not buying it.

@rapilabs

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@rapilabs

rapilabs Nov 1, 2014

@BLKSwan what's your association with Tip4Commit?

Note that the "We are not affiliated with most of the projects, their owners might not endorse use of tip4commit" was only added in the past couple of hours in response to this.

Perhaps some honesty from the beginning would've prevented this whole thing from blowing up.

rapilabs commented Nov 1, 2014

@BLKSwan what's your association with Tip4Commit?

Note that the "We are not affiliated with most of the projects, their owners might not endorse use of tip4commit" was only added in the past couple of hours in response to this.

Perhaps some honesty from the beginning would've prevented this whole thing from blowing up.

@beberlei

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@beberlei

beberlei Nov 1, 2014

I don't want doctrine/* to show up as well, please remove us.

beberlei commented Nov 1, 2014

I don't want doctrine/* to show up as well, please remove us.

@BillyWM

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@BillyWM

BillyWM Nov 1, 2014

@csvan Under FOSS licenses, people generally have the right to profit from your work (e.g. Angry Birds had the right to make billions using zlib-licensed Box2D). This applies even to the (L)GPL (it is a common misunderstanding that the GPL forbids commercial use).

I see no problem with this at its most basic. In concept, I would defend the right for third parties to place bounties on work they deem useful. I think the real problem is the side effects. The maintainer doesn't want to silence the annoying notifications because it's his advertising, so you can expect him to be unreasonably stubborn (Exposure = more tips = more 1% cuts delivered to him). Also, will people start bombarding maintainers with tiny commits if this takes off, in hopes of getting a cut? Will maintainers start to reject commits out of concern that they're just for bounties (I submitted a pull request to Mitsuhiko's Jinja2 to fix a tiny typo I happened to see reading the docs. I didn't do it for pay. With tip4commit around, I may now be eyed with suspicion for things like that)

BillyWM commented Nov 1, 2014

@csvan Under FOSS licenses, people generally have the right to profit from your work (e.g. Angry Birds had the right to make billions using zlib-licensed Box2D). This applies even to the (L)GPL (it is a common misunderstanding that the GPL forbids commercial use).

I see no problem with this at its most basic. In concept, I would defend the right for third parties to place bounties on work they deem useful. I think the real problem is the side effects. The maintainer doesn't want to silence the annoying notifications because it's his advertising, so you can expect him to be unreasonably stubborn (Exposure = more tips = more 1% cuts delivered to him). Also, will people start bombarding maintainers with tiny commits if this takes off, in hopes of getting a cut? Will maintainers start to reject commits out of concern that they're just for bounties (I submitted a pull request to Mitsuhiko's Jinja2 to fix a tiny typo I happened to see reading the docs. I didn't do it for pay. With tip4commit around, I may now be eyed with suspicion for things like that)

@csvan

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@csvan

csvan Nov 1, 2014

@BillyWM all very good and valid points.

csvan commented Nov 1, 2014

@BillyWM all very good and valid points.

@arsenische

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@arsenische

arsenische Nov 1, 2014

Contributor

@rapilabs as for me, it was pretty obvious we are not affiliated with project creators... the issue #136 was created a week ago after @untitaker informed us about the issue. Uder the pressure of current attention I just deployed a temporary urgent fix to prevent further confusion before a better solution is developed.

Contributor

arsenische commented Nov 1, 2014

@rapilabs as for me, it was pretty obvious we are not affiliated with project creators... the issue #136 was created a week ago after @untitaker informed us about the issue. Uder the pressure of current attention I just deployed a temporary urgent fix to prevent further confusion before a better solution is developed.

@rapilabs

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@rapilabs

rapilabs Nov 1, 2014

@arsenische wise actions, now go and implement that blacklist and show everyone that you aren't devious devs ;)

rapilabs commented Nov 1, 2014

@arsenische wise actions, now go and implement that blacklist and show everyone that you aren't devious devs ;)

@chx

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chx

chx Nov 1, 2014

For your own legal safety and the sake of the projects you are trying to support your service should be opt-in, just like other services of this type (gittip/gratipay), not opt-out

This.

chx commented Nov 1, 2014

For your own legal safety and the sake of the projects you are trying to support your service should be opt-in, just like other services of this type (gittip/gratipay), not opt-out

This.

@arsenische

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@arsenische

arsenische Nov 1, 2014

Contributor

@rapilabs I am still in doubts. I feel that my arguments against it are left unnoticed. Just updated the https://github.com/tip4commit/tip4commit/wiki/FAQ , quoting from there:

If somebody wants to reward independent contributors of random opensource project, does he or she needs a permission from project maintainers? Should project maintainers have the power over economic activities of other people?

Contributor

arsenische commented Nov 1, 2014

@rapilabs I am still in doubts. I feel that my arguments against it are left unnoticed. Just updated the https://github.com/tip4commit/tip4commit/wiki/FAQ , quoting from there:

If somebody wants to reward independent contributors of random opensource project, does he or she needs a permission from project maintainers? Should project maintainers have the power over economic activities of other people?

@chx

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chx

chx Nov 1, 2014

@arsenische Not necessarily the project maintainers but when the project is a trademark then yes the trademark holder's permission might or might not be necessary depending on their trademark policy. And then raising money for certain individuals most certainly and absolutely requires their permission. You absolutely have no idea of the legal repercussions of what you are doing.

chx commented Nov 1, 2014

@arsenische Not necessarily the project maintainers but when the project is a trademark then yes the trademark holder's permission might or might not be necessary depending on their trademark policy. And then raising money for certain individuals most certainly and absolutely requires their permission. You absolutely have no idea of the legal repercussions of what you are doing.

@BLKSwan

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@BLKSwan

BLKSwan Nov 1, 2014

@rapilabs my apologies, I did not notice that was a recent addition. As for my association, I am just someone that likes the service, I have no direct ties to Tip4Commit outside of commenting here and donating on the site.

This is my profile on Tip4Commit:
https://coingiving.com/sponsors/174-blkswan

BLKSwan commented Nov 1, 2014

@rapilabs my apologies, I did not notice that was a recent addition. As for my association, I am just someone that likes the service, I have no direct ties to Tip4Commit outside of commenting here and donating on the site.

This is my profile on Tip4Commit:
https://coingiving.com/sponsors/174-blkswan

@dbgarf

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@dbgarf

dbgarf Nov 1, 2014

+1 on everyone pushing for this to be opt-in only. it is highly inappropriate to involve projects without explicit consent.

dbgarf commented Nov 1, 2014

+1 on everyone pushing for this to be opt-in only. it is highly inappropriate to involve projects without explicit consent.

@arsenische

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@arsenische

arsenische Nov 1, 2014

Contributor

@chx we are raising money to tip any individuals who contribute to the project, that's not about raising money to some particular individual. if contributor doesn't claim money, the'll be returned to the donation pool. what's wrong with that?

Contributor

arsenische commented Nov 1, 2014

@chx we are raising money to tip any individuals who contribute to the project, that's not about raising money to some particular individual. if contributor doesn't claim money, the'll be returned to the donation pool. what's wrong with that?

@verint

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@verint

verint Nov 1, 2014

@arsenische Yes, so an individual contributor can sign up claiming/showing his contribution to different projects? Why isn't that feature there?

You are currently forcing all contributors in a project to get involved. Why can't you see that?

verint commented Nov 1, 2014

@arsenische Yes, so an individual contributor can sign up claiming/showing his contribution to different projects? Why isn't that feature there?

You are currently forcing all contributors in a project to get involved. Why can't you see that?

@canpolat

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@canpolat

canpolat Nov 1, 2014

If somebody wants to reward independent contributors of random opensource project, does he or she needs a permission from project maintainers? Should project maintainers have the power over economic activities of other people?

This is not only about project maintainers. You don't have the consent of the individual contributors either. Make it an opt-in system and all concerns raised here will disappear.

canpolat commented Nov 1, 2014

If somebody wants to reward independent contributors of random opensource project, does he or she needs a permission from project maintainers? Should project maintainers have the power over economic activities of other people?

This is not only about project maintainers. You don't have the consent of the individual contributors either. Make it an opt-in system and all concerns raised here will disappear.

@untitaker

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@untitaker

untitaker Nov 1, 2014

After looking at Flattrs business model, i now think that tip4commit doesn't necessarily have to become opt-in. Flattr offers to collect money too -- the main difference between it and tip4commit is that Flattr doesn't actually withdraw money until the project maintainer actually claims it. Another difference is that Flattr doesn't send any unsolicited mails.

After looking at Flattrs business model, i now think that tip4commit doesn't necessarily have to become opt-in. Flattr offers to collect money too -- the main difference between it and tip4commit is that Flattr doesn't actually withdraw money until the project maintainer actually claims it. Another difference is that Flattr doesn't send any unsolicited mails.

@PeterBorah

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@PeterBorah

PeterBorah Nov 1, 2014

@arsenische: You're fighting a losing battle, here. The internet disagrees with your stance. That's not a good place to be for an internet-based service.

Please just bow to inevitability and respect for the open-source community by making it opt-in, as very nearly everyone in this thread wants you to. At the very, very least, you must provide an easy way to opt-out.

@arsenische: You're fighting a losing battle, here. The internet disagrees with your stance. That's not a good place to be for an internet-based service.

Please just bow to inevitability and respect for the open-source community by making it opt-in, as very nearly everyone in this thread wants you to. At the very, very least, you must provide an easy way to opt-out.

@rapilabs

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@rapilabs

rapilabs Nov 1, 2014

@arsenische If there's anything to take away from this experience, is that you should listen to the community. Fighting against it raises suspicions that there are ulterior motives.

rapilabs commented Nov 1, 2014

@arsenische If there's anything to take away from this experience, is that you should listen to the community. Fighting against it raises suspicions that there are ulterior motives.

@BLKSwan

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@BLKSwan

BLKSwan Nov 1, 2014

Make it an opt-in system and all concerns raised here will disappear.

Much of the functionality of the service would also disappear.

BLKSwan commented Nov 1, 2014

Make it an opt-in system and all concerns raised here will disappear.

Much of the functionality of the service would also disappear.

@umurkontaci

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@umurkontaci

umurkontaci Nov 1, 2014

@arsenische I have been following this discussion from the beginning (in HN too). I feel both sad and angry about the arguments you make towards the people who are disagreeing with you. The problem is, you cannot use a developer's name, or any trademark to get people to pay you, without the actual person's consent. Whether it goes to the payee or not, is irrelevant.

@arsenische I have been following this discussion from the beginning (in HN too). I feel both sad and angry about the arguments you make towards the people who are disagreeing with you. The problem is, you cannot use a developer's name, or any trademark to get people to pay you, without the actual person's consent. Whether it goes to the payee or not, is irrelevant.

@chx

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chx

chx Nov 1, 2014

@BLKSwan then perhaps there's no need for it in this way and form...? See this #127 (comment) .

chx commented Nov 1, 2014

@BLKSwan then perhaps there's no need for it in this way and form...? See this #127 (comment) .

@verint

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@verint

verint Nov 1, 2014

@BLKSwan then site should not exist, that simple.

verint commented Nov 1, 2014

@BLKSwan then site should not exist, that simple.

@ubernostrum

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@ubernostrum

ubernostrum Nov 1, 2014

@arsenische I will reiterate what I have asked for in #146. I am an individual developer making a request on behalf of my individual self. I do not want to receive "tips" from your "service". You do not have the right to attempt to list me/opt me in to your "service" without my consent. You do not have my consent. I do not want to receive emails about "tips" from your "service". I do not want you to collect money on my behalf.

I do not know how to state it more clearly than this. I want my individual personal name out of your listings, I never want it to appear there again, and I want to be permanently removed from your "service".

You are failing to display the good faith asked of you in #146.

@arsenische I will reiterate what I have asked for in #146. I am an individual developer making a request on behalf of my individual self. I do not want to receive "tips" from your "service". You do not have the right to attempt to list me/opt me in to your "service" without my consent. You do not have my consent. I do not want to receive emails about "tips" from your "service". I do not want you to collect money on my behalf.

I do not know how to state it more clearly than this. I want my individual personal name out of your listings, I never want it to appear there again, and I want to be permanently removed from your "service".

You are failing to display the good faith asked of you in #146.

@arsenische

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@arsenische

arsenische Nov 1, 2014

Contributor
  1. If community is against the site, I am sure @alexandrz and me will come to a decision to kill it and make all we can to return unused funds or donate to charity.
  2. If there are certain issues that can be fixed without breaking the system - we should fix them.
  3. I personally think that tickets like #152 break the system, but if there is consensus on that - let's be it.

Edit: created #157 to address p.1

Edit2: replied to @ubernostrum 's #146

Edit3: removed mitsuhiko/* as requested

Contributor

arsenische commented Nov 1, 2014

  1. If community is against the site, I am sure @alexandrz and me will come to a decision to kill it and make all we can to return unused funds or donate to charity.
  2. If there are certain issues that can be fixed without breaking the system - we should fix them.
  3. I personally think that tickets like #152 break the system, but if there is consensus on that - let's be it.

Edit: created #157 to address p.1

Edit2: replied to @ubernostrum 's #146

Edit3: removed mitsuhiko/* as requested

@arsenische

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@arsenische

arsenische Nov 1, 2014

Contributor

I think it is a good idea to create a separate issue for each problem you see and continue discussion on that particular issue. We went too far from "Please remove mitsuhiko" and @mitsuhiko closed this ticket already.

Contributor

arsenische commented Nov 1, 2014

I think it is a good idea to create a separate issue for each problem you see and continue discussion on that particular issue. We went too far from "Please remove mitsuhiko" and @mitsuhiko closed this ticket already.

@tip4commit tip4commit locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 1, 2014

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.