no.de support / solaris support? #6

Open
DTrejo opened this Issue Sep 2, 2011 · 4 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
4 participants
@DTrejo

DTrejo commented Sep 2, 2011

I ran

$ npm install expresso

Error output:
https://gist.github.com/4ef36101fdbea2dee21e

Main issue, I think:

make[4]: Entering directory `/home/node/local/lib/node_modules/expresso/deps/jscoverage/js'
config.mk:167: ref-config/SunOS5.11_i86pc.mk: No such file or directory
Makefile.ref:58: NANOJIT_ARCH not defined in config/SunOS5.11_i86pc.mk, JIT disabled
make[4]: *** No rule to make target `ref-config/SunOS5.11_i86pc.mk'.  Stop.

Going to sleep now, but may have some time to try and get this to work and report back. If you have a quick solution, that'd be great :) Otherwise, we'll see what I come up with.

Cheers and thank you for expresso & jscoverage!
David

@hudon

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@hudon

hudon Oct 22, 2011

@DTrejo, have you had any luck with this issue? I'm also using Node SmartMachine from Joyent and expresso won't install in that env.

hudon commented Oct 22, 2011

@DTrejo, have you had any luck with this issue? I'm also using Node SmartMachine from Joyent and expresso won't install in that env.

@DTrejo

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@DTrejo

DTrejo Oct 22, 2011

No luck yet! I made a version of it that doesn't use JScov, took me a bit of fiddling with makefiles :|

tj / @visionmedia, please save us!

Or we could just make a JS-cov free version in a fork — I'd guess you wouldn't mind much.

Cheers,
D

DTrejo commented Oct 22, 2011

No luck yet! I made a version of it that doesn't use JScov, took me a bit of fiddling with makefiles :|

tj / @visionmedia, please save us!

Or we could just make a JS-cov free version in a fork — I'd guess you wouldn't mind much.

Cheers,
D

@tj

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@tj

tj Oct 22, 2011

Owner

honestly I would be fine with removing it all together for right now, code coverage should be taken lightly anyway, especially the statement-based cov jscov provides

Owner

tj commented Oct 22, 2011

honestly I would be fine with removing it all together for right now, code coverage should be taken lightly anyway, especially the statement-based cov jscov provides

@c4milo

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@c4milo

c4milo Oct 22, 2011

do it! :D

c4milo commented Oct 22, 2011

do it! :D

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment