Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Force the mentos.py to use python2 #59

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

@fenprace
Copy link

@fenprace fenprace commented Jan 29, 2013

The mentos.py should be forced to use python2,
because Archlinux and some other operation systems use python3 as the default version instead of python2.
#45 and #49 could be solved.

The mentos.py should be forced to use python2,
because Archlinux and some other operation systems use python3 as the default version instead of python2.
@connermcd
Copy link

@connermcd connermcd commented Mar 11, 2013

Please do something about this. I spent ~30 minutes hunting down this bug coming from octopress.

@robin850
Copy link

@robin850 robin850 commented Mar 12, 2013

ping @tmm1. Thanks for this pull request @fenprace.

@ldenman
Copy link

@ldenman ldenman commented Mar 12, 2013

Agreed, this commit would be nice. I use archlinux and have python 3 installed by default. Thanks!

@avtobiff
Copy link

@avtobiff avtobiff commented Mar 14, 2013

Debian (and I suppose also Ubuntu then) does not have /usr/bin/python2, but instead python2.6 and python2.7.

This would break mentos.py on Debian (and derived) systems.

@connermcd
Copy link

@connermcd connermcd commented Mar 14, 2013

Yeah, I don't think it's a good solution, but it needs one.
On Mar 13, 2013 8:28 PM, "avtobiff" notifications@github.com wrote:

Debian (and I suppose also Ubuntu then) does not have /usr/bin/python2,
but instead python2.6 and python2.7.

This would break mentos.py on Debian (and derived) systems.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/59#issuecomment-14881732
.

@tmm1
Copy link
Owner

@tmm1 tmm1 commented Mar 14, 2013

Dupe of #58

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.