-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 232
Switch to MIT license #264
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Sure. My contribution isn't even copyrightable (just a file extension change). |
BTW, your LICENSE says to check AUTHORS file for the list of contributors, but there is no such file in the repo. Probably makes sense to remove that note. |
When the new license takes effect we'll have the AUTHORS thing out, we'll link to https://github.com/tony/tmuxp/graphs/contributors |
Good action! I agree. |
I have no problem with this. Thanks for keeping us all in the loop. |
I am fine with it. |
I'm fine with this as well.
…On Sat, May 27, 2017, 10:11 PM anatoly techtonik ***@***.***> wrote:
I am fine with it.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#264 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABYq8xKlgSp_vGzBt5utf9GHUa2Fw4Wxks5r-QHpgaJpZM4NohGZ>
.
|
I agree, thanks! |
fine for me |
Ok for me. |
Ok for me too |
Ok with me |
👍 |
I'm ok with it. |
I agree 😄
Joel Wallis Jucá
joelwallis.com
…On May 28, 2017 6:10 AM, "Martin Bukatovič" ***@***.***> wrote:
I'm ok with it.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#264 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AApIXNFwDUwgmwYEmVilIsuJNwQQXw5rks5r-Tn2gaJpZM4NohGZ>
.
|
OK for me. |
Ok for me. |
Ok for me too :) |
I agree. |
Ok by me. |
Same here, I agree. |
fine with me |
Fine with me.
Domas
…On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Greg Back ***@***.***> wrote:
fine with me
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#264 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAHRtB6XjIFE866SlNsDyMCxKlZwGOxZks5r_B3UgaJpZM4NohGZ>
.
|
I'm OK with this! |
This is fine with me! |
We're almost there. @kmactavish @roxit @raine @cryptojuice @sehe @Omeryl, do you agree to licensing your contributions under MIT license? If so, reply here that it's Ok! |
Good with me. |
OK! |
Fine! |
@roxit, @cryptojuice, @Omeryl, can you take a look at this issue? |
@tony I don’t believe I have any code in the repository. The only thing I recall writing is a typo fix to the README. Therefore, do whatever you need. |
thank you @Omeryl ! |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had This bot is used to handle issues where the issue hasn't been discussed or |
Thank you for updating this issue. It is no longer marked as stale. |
@cryptojuice @roxit : You okay with relicensing your contributions to MIT? If so, please reply here. Only two more to go! 😄 |
Here is @roxit and @cryptojuice's commits: @roxit: acd882c (doc update), 992a50c (loading detached) @cryptojuice 2ea1366 (typo) Last call 😆 It's been a couple of months and I want to release MIT. If you're willing to license your commits MIT, please respond here. If there's no response, this license change can't wait forever, I may revert them and/or rewrite them licensed under MIT. |
This reverts commit 992a50c, a BSD-licensed commit blocking #264, conversion to MIT. See also: #264 (comment)
One of the code changes from @roxit, @cryptojuice's weren't revertable (findable) from master, so it looks like we're good to do the switch! #363 merged. Updating LICENSE now. |
1.4.0 is released. We're MIT. 🎉 |
Woot!
…On Sun, Mar 11, 2018, 6:30 PM Tony Narlock ***@***.***> wrote:
1.4.0 is released.
We're MIT. 🎉
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#264 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAP2p2mbL3EfhaJEaSHvsMHoMfnYqteCks5tdc_QgaJpZM4NohGZ>
.
|
Nice! (but it took 10 months...wow. I wonder if asking permission was really necessary, besides being a nice thing to do) |
I'd like to switch the license to something even more permissive than BSD 3-clause (MIT).
Sorry for causing the ping, but wanted to get it out of the way.
If you're ok with it, please reply with a note that you agree for your code contribution(s) to tmuxp to be released under the MIT license.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: