Skip to content

Switch to MIT license #264

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
28 of 30 tasks
tony opened this issue May 28, 2017 · 41 comments
Closed
28 of 30 tasks

Switch to MIT license #264

tony opened this issue May 28, 2017 · 41 comments
Labels

Comments

@tony
Copy link
Member

tony commented May 28, 2017

I'd like to switch the license to something even more permissive than BSD 3-clause (MIT).

Sorry for causing the ping, but wanted to get it out of the way.

If you're ok with it, please reply with a note that you agree for your code contribution(s) to tmuxp to be released under the MIT license.

@lukateras
Copy link
Contributor

lukateras commented May 28, 2017

Sure. My contribution isn't even copyrightable (just a file extension change).

@lukateras
Copy link
Contributor

lukateras commented May 28, 2017

BTW, your LICENSE says to check AUTHORS file for the list of contributors, but there is no such file in the repo. Probably makes sense to remove that note.

@tony
Copy link
Member Author

tony commented May 28, 2017

When the new license takes effect we'll have the AUTHORS thing out, we'll link to https://github.com/tony/tmuxp/graphs/contributors

@Ilyes512
Copy link
Contributor

Good action! I agree.

@ikirudennis
Copy link
Contributor

I have no problem with this. Thanks for keeping us all in the loop.

@techtonik
Copy link
Contributor

I am fine with it.

@achals
Copy link
Contributor

achals commented May 28, 2017 via email

@rafi
Copy link
Contributor

rafi commented May 28, 2017

I agree, thanks!

@ThiefMaster
Copy link
Contributor

fine for me

@mexicarne
Copy link
Contributor

Ok for me.

@fpietka
Copy link
Contributor

fpietka commented May 28, 2017

Ok for me too

@abeyer
Copy link
Contributor

abeyer commented May 28, 2017

Ok with me

@tek
Copy link

tek commented May 28, 2017

👍

@marbu
Copy link
Contributor

marbu commented May 28, 2017

I'm ok with it.

@joeljuca
Copy link
Contributor

joeljuca commented May 28, 2017 via email

@sebastianst
Copy link
Contributor

OK for me.

@ohardy
Copy link
Contributor

ohardy commented May 28, 2017

Ok for me.

@madprog
Copy link
Contributor

madprog commented May 28, 2017

Ok for me too :)

@estin
Copy link
Contributor

estin commented May 29, 2017

I agree.

@JorisE
Copy link
Contributor

JorisE commented May 29, 2017

Ok by me.

@yvaucher
Copy link
Contributor

Same here, I agree.

@gtback
Copy link
Contributor

gtback commented May 30, 2017

fine with me

@tasdomas
Copy link
Contributor

tasdomas commented May 30, 2017 via email

@myw
Copy link
Contributor

myw commented May 30, 2017

I'm OK with this!

@thomasballinger
Copy link
Contributor

This is fine with me!

@tony
Copy link
Member Author

tony commented Jun 21, 2017

We're almost there. @kmactavish @roxit @raine @cryptojuice @sehe @Omeryl, do you agree to licensing your contributions under MIT license? If so, reply here that it's Ok!

@kmactavish
Copy link
Contributor

Good with me.

@raine
Copy link
Contributor

raine commented Jun 21, 2017

OK!

@sehe
Copy link
Contributor

sehe commented Jun 22, 2017

Fine!

@tony
Copy link
Member Author

tony commented Nov 11, 2017

@roxit, @cryptojuice, @Omeryl, can you take a look at this issue?

@Omeryl
Copy link
Contributor

Omeryl commented Nov 11, 2017

@tony I don’t believe I have any code in the repository. The only thing I recall writing is a typo fix to the README. Therefore, do whatever you need.

@tony
Copy link
Member Author

tony commented Nov 11, 2017

thank you @Omeryl !

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jan 10, 2018

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had
recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you
for your contributions.

This bot is used to handle issues where the issue hasn't been discussed or
has gone out of date. If an issue isn't resolved and handled in a certain
period of time, it may be closed. If you would like your issue re-opened,
please create a fresh issue with the latest, up to date information and
mention this issue in it.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Jan 10, 2018
@kmactavish
Copy link
Contributor

@roxit @cryptojuice?

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jan 10, 2018

Thank you for updating this issue. It is no longer marked as stale.

@stale stale bot removed the stale label Jan 10, 2018
@tony tony added the pinned label Mar 3, 2018
@tony
Copy link
Member Author

tony commented Mar 3, 2018

@cryptojuice @roxit : You okay with relicensing your contributions to MIT? If so, please reply here. Only two more to go! 😄

@tony
Copy link
Member Author

tony commented Mar 11, 2018

Here is @roxit and @cryptojuice's commits:

@roxit: acd882c (doc update), 992a50c (loading detached)

@cryptojuice 2ea1366 (typo)

Last call 😆 It's been a couple of months and I want to release MIT. If you're willing to license your commits MIT, please respond here.

If there's no response, this license change can't wait forever, I may revert them and/or rewrite them licensed under MIT.

tony added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 12, 2018
This reverts commit 992a50c, a
BSD-licensed commit blocking #264, conversion to MIT.

See also:
#264 (comment)
@tony
Copy link
Member Author

tony commented Mar 12, 2018

One of the code changes from @roxit, @cryptojuice's weren't revertable (findable) from master, so it looks like we're good to do the switch!

#363 merged. Updating LICENSE now.

@tony tony closed this as completed in a6cc92e Mar 12, 2018
@tony
Copy link
Member Author

tony commented Mar 12, 2018

1.4.0 is released.

We're MIT. 🎉

@kageurufu
Copy link

kageurufu commented Mar 12, 2018 via email

@Ilyes512
Copy link
Contributor

Nice! (but it took 10 months...wow. I wonder if asking permission was really necessary, besides being a nice thing to do)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests