Address range support in ClientIpActivationStrategy #172
I've a funny story to share. I just ran into weird test failures with the test you implemented on my notebook. Basically the failing test verified, that
So the current code treats
I "fixed" this like this: 1609f9b
I'm not sure if I like that the code currently resolves hostnames. Does this make sense?
Of course does the alphabet resolve
Hm. This "abc/24" was a way to test the IllegalArgumentException that is thrown by the CIDRUtil.