appledoc v2.2 reports itself as v2.1 #395

wearhere opened this Issue Aug 20, 2013 · 7 comments


None yet
3 participants

After installing v2.2 (using homebrew), appledoc --version prints:

appledoc version: 2.1 (build 858)

This is very confusing especially insofar as 2.2 has at least one breaking change: that it's now required to document enum values.

wearhere referenced this issue in inkling/Subliminal Aug 21, 2013


Travis can't build Subliminal's documentation. #70


tomaz commented Aug 21, 2013

Yes, 2.x still requires manual version/build number handling. All my newer projects have this automated via git, so I forget I need to tweak the values manually here... Will update asap.

Thanks! I've submitted 2.1 (Homebrew/legacy-homebrew@33aa810) to homebrew-versions btw: homebrew/homebrew-versions#190. I'm looking forward to documenting enum/bitmask types but I need a bit more time. :)

tomaz closed this in 63637fb Sep 2, 2013

wearhere commented Sep 2, 2013

Thanks @tomaz!

wearhere commented Sep 9, 2013

@tomaz, it looks like does not include this change. Would you consider patching it?


tomaz commented Sep 11, 2013

Just pushed updated v2.2 tag - it now points to latest masted. Thanks for pointing it out,

wearhere referenced this issue in Homebrew/legacy-homebrew Sep 11, 2013


Update sha1 for appledoc 2.2. #22471

Thanks @tomaz. I've put in a pull request to update appledoc's formula.

In the future, would you mind tagging a new minor release for something like this? It's easier on downstream packagers if a tagged release remains stable. Thanks!

@scpeters scpeters pushed a commit to scpeters/homebrew that referenced this issue Oct 30, 2013

@adamv Jeff Wear + adamv appledoc: update sha1
The release was patched to address tomaz/appledoc#395.

Closes #22471.

Signed-off-by: Adam Vandenberg <>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment