chore(format): remove end-of-line spaces spotted by remark-lint-no-trailing-spaces

contract-dev/gas.mdx

@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ let sizeMsg = computeDataSize(
 );
 
 let fwdFee = getForwardFee(
-    sizeMsg.cells - 1, 
+    sizeMsg.cells - 1,
     sizeMsg.bits - msg.toCell().bits(),
     isAccountInMasterchain
 );

contract-dev/security.mdx

@@ -14,10 +14,10 @@ Improper handling of signed integers can allow attackers to exploit overflow/und
 (cell,()) transfer_voting_power(cell votes, slice from, slice to, int amount) impure {
     int from_votes = get_voting_power(votes, from);
     int to_votes = get_voting_power(votes, to);
-    
+
     from_votes -= amount;  // Can become negative!
     to_votes += amount;
-    
+
     votes~set_voting_power(from, from_votes);
     votes~set_voting_power(to, to_votes);
     return (votes,());
@@ -30,12 +30,12 @@ Improper handling of signed integers can allow attackers to exploit overflow/und
 (cell,()) transfer_voting_power(cell votes, slice from, slice to, int amount) impure {
     int from_votes = get_voting_power(votes, from);
     int to_votes = get_voting_power(votes, to);
-    
+
     throw_unless(998, from_votes >= amount);  // Validate sufficient balance
-    
+
     from_votes -= amount;
     to_votes += amount;
-    
+
     votes~set_voting_power(from, from_votes);
     votes~set_voting_power(to, to_votes);
     return (votes,());
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ Destroying accounts using [send mode](/foundations/messages/modes) `128 + 32` wi
     if (in_msg_body.slice_empty?()) {
         return ();  ;; Dangerous: empty message handling
     }
-    
+
     ;; Process and destroy account
     send_raw_message(msg, 128 + 32);  ;; Destroys account
 }
@@ -79,10 +79,10 @@ Destroying accounts using [send mode](/foundations/messages/modes) `128 + 32` wi
 () recv_internal(msg_value, in_msg_full, in_msg_body) {
     ;; Proper validation before any destruction
     throw_unless(error::unauthorized, authorized_sender?(sender));
-    
+
     ;; Ensure no pending operations
     throw_unless(error::pending_operations, safe_to_destroy?());
-    
+
     ;; Then proceed with destruction if really needed
 }
 ```
@@ -98,11 +98,11 @@ Replay protection is a security mechanism that prevents an attacker from [reusin
     slice ds = get_data().begin_parse();
     int stored_seqno = ds~load_uint(32);
     int msg_seqno = in_msg~load_uint(32);
-    
+
     throw_unless(33, msg_seqno == stored_seqno);  ;; Prevent replay
-    
+
     accept_message();
-    
+
     ;; Update sequence number
     set_data(begin_cell().store_uint(stored_seqno + 1, 32).end_cell());
 }
@@ -454,7 +454,7 @@ Contracts can be updated if not properly protected, changing their behavior unex
 () update_code(cell new_code) impure {
     throw_unless(error::unauthorized, authorized_admin?(sender()));
     throw_unless(error::invalid_code, validate_code?(new_code));
-    
+
     set_code(new_code);
 }
 ```

contract-dev/testing/overview.mdx

@@ -56,15 +56,15 @@ describe('MyContract', () => {
 
     beforeEach(async () => {
         blockchain = await Blockchain.create();
-        
+
         myContract = blockchain.openContract(
             MyContract.createFromConfig({}, code)
         );
-        
+
         deployer = await blockchain.treasury('deployer');
-        
+
         const deployResult = await myContract.sendDeploy(
-            deployer.getSender(), 
+            deployer.getSender(),
             toNano('0.05')
         );
 
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ Each test should include a fresh `Blockchain` instance to ensure:
 beforeEach(async () => {
     // Fresh blockchain for each test
     blockchain = await Blockchain.create();
-    
+
     // Each test gets clean treasuries
     deployer = await blockchain.treasury('deployer');
     user = await blockchain.treasury('user');
@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ npx blueprint test MyContract
 # Run with coverage
 npx blueprint test --coverage
 
-# Run with gas reporting  
+# Run with gas reporting
 npx blueprint test --gas-report
 ```
 

contract-dev/upgrades.mdx

@@ -77,8 +77,8 @@ fun onInternalMessage(in: InMessage) {
             }
         }
 
-        else => { 
-            // just accept TON 
+        else => {
+            // just accept TON
         }
     }
 }
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ fun onInternalMessage(in: InMessage) {
 
         ApproveUpgrade => {
             var storage = lazy Storage.load();
-            
+
             assert (in.senderAddress == storage.adminAddress) throw 100;
             assert (storage.CurrentRequest != null) throw 301;
             assert (storage.CurrentRequest!.timestamp + storage.timeout < blockchain.now()) throw 302;
@@ -189,8 +189,8 @@ fun onInternalMessage(in: InMessage) {
             }
         }
 
-        else => { 
-            // just accepted tons 
+        else => {
+            // just accepted tons
         }
     }
 }
@@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ type AllowedMessages =
     | HotUpgrade
     | IncreaseCounter
 
-// migration function must have method_id 
+// migration function must have method_id
 @method_id(2121)
 fun hotUpgradeData(additionalData: cell?) { return null; }
 
@@ -273,21 +273,21 @@ fun onInternalMessage(in: InMessage) {
         HotUpgrade => {
             var storage = lazy Storage.load();
             assert (in.senderAddress == storage.adminAddress) throw 1111;
-            
+
             contract.setCodePostponed(msg.code);
 
             setTvmRegisterC3(transformSliceToContinuation(msg.code.beginParse()));
             hotUpgradeData(msg.additionalData);
-        } 
+        }
 
         IncreaseCounter => {
             var storage = lazy Storage.load();
             storage.counter += 1;
             storage.save();
         }
 
-        else => { 
-            // just accept TON 
+        else => {
+            // just accept TON
         }
     }
 }
@@ -333,13 +333,13 @@ type AllowedMessages =
     | HotUpgrade
     | IncreaseCounter
 
-// migration function must have method_id 
+// migration function must have method_id
 @method_id(2121)
-fun hotUpgradeData(additionalData: cell?) {  
+fun hotUpgradeData(additionalData: cell?) {
     var oldStorage = lazy oldStorage.load();
 
     assert (additionalData != null) throw 1112;
-    
+
     var storage = Storage {
         adminAddress: oldStorage.adminAddress,
         counter: oldStorage.counter,
@@ -368,21 +368,21 @@ fun onInternalMessage(in: InMessage) {
         HotUpgrade => {
             var storage = lazy Storage.load();
             assert (in.senderAddress == storage.adminAddress) throw 1111;
-            
+
             contract.setCodePostponed(msg.code);
 
             setTvmRegisterC3(transformSliceToContinuation(msg.code.beginParse()));
             hotUpgradeData(msg.additionalData);
-        } 
+        }
 
         IncreaseCounter => {
             var storage = lazy Storage.load();
             storage.counter += 1;
             storage.save();
         }
 
-        else => { 
-            // just accept TON 
+        else => {
+            // just accept TON
         }
     }
 }

contract-dev/vanity.mdx

@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ export class VanityContract implements Contract {
     }
 
     static createFromConfig(
-        config: VanityContractConfig, 
+        config: VanityContractConfig,
         workchain = 0
     ) {
         const data = vanityContractConfigToCell(config);

foundations/actions/overview.mdx

@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ Finally, in the action phase, created actions are executed in the order they wer
 out_list_empty$_ = OutList 0;
 out_list$_ {n:#} prev:^(OutList n) action:OutAction
     = OutList (n + 1);
-action_send_msg#0ec3c86d mode:(## 8) 
+action_send_msg#0ec3c86d mode:(## 8)
     out_msg:^(MessageRelaxed Any) = OutAction;
 action_set_code#ad4de08e new_code:^Cell = OutAction;
 action_reserve_currency#36e6b809 mode:(## 8)

foundations/actions/send.mdx

@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ If after the second attempt the message is still too large, the exception is thr
 ## Serialization
 
 ```tlb
-action_send_msg#0ec3c86d mode:(## 8) 
+action_send_msg#0ec3c86d mode:(## 8)
     out_msg:^(MessageRelaxed Any) = OutAction;
 
 out_list_node$_ prev:^Cell action:OutAction = OutListNode;
@@ -49,10 +49,10 @@ message$_ {X:Type} info:CommonMsgInfoRelaxed
     body:(Either X ^X) = MessageRelaxed X;
 
 int_msg_info$0 ihr_disabled:Bool bounce:Bool bounced:Bool
-    src:MsgAddress dest:MsgAddressInt 
+    src:MsgAddress dest:MsgAddressInt
     value:CurrencyCollection extra_flags:(VarUInteger 16) fwd_fee:Grams
     created_lt:uint64 created_at:uint32 = CommonMsgInfoRelaxed;
 
 ext_out_msg_info$11 src:MsgAddress dest:MsgAddressExt
-    created_lt:uint64 created_at:uint32 = CommonMsgInfoRelaxed;    
+    created_lt:uint64 created_at:uint32 = CommonMsgInfoRelaxed;
 ```

foundations/serialization/boc.mdx

@@ -111,11 +111,11 @@ A final serialization of the bag of cells must include a magic number indicating
 Only one [serialization scheme of BoCs](https://github.com/ton-blockchain/ton/blob/24dc184a2ea67f9c47042b4104bbb4d82289fac1/crypto/tl/boc.tlb#L25) is used in TON Blockchain (there are also two outdated BoC serialization schemes in the file):
 
 ```tlb PseudoTL-B
-serialized_boc#b5ee9c72 has_idx:(## 1) has_crc32c:(## 1) 
+serialized_boc#b5ee9c72 has_idx:(## 1) has_crc32c:(## 1)
     has_cache_bits:(## 1) flags:(## 2) { flags = 0 }
     size:(## 3) { size <= 4 }
-    off_bytes:(## 8) { off_bytes <= 8 } 
-    cells:(##(size * 8)) 
+    off_bytes:(## 8) { off_bytes <= 8 }
+    cells:(##(size * 8))
     roots:(##(size * 8)) { roots >= 1 }
     absent:(##(size * 8)) { roots + absent <= cells }
     tot_cells_size:(##(off_bytes * 8))

languages/func/known-issues.mdx

@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ effectively removing the expected division by zero exception.
 Examples:
 
 ```func
-;; All these produce 0, irrespective of divisor z, 
+;; All these produce 0, irrespective of divisor z,
 ;; even when z is 0.
 muldiv(0, 1, z);
 muldivc(1, 0, z);
@@ -87,11 +87,11 @@ but the FunC compiler simplifies them irrespective of `z`:
 
 ```func
 (0 & (- z)) <= 0;     ;; Should overflow for z = -115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665640564039457584007913129639936,
-                      ;; but simplified to true  
+                      ;; but simplified to true
 (0 * (- z)) <= 0;     ;; Should overflow for z = -115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665640564039457584007913129639936,
-                      ;; but simplified to true  
+                      ;; but simplified to true
 ((z / -1) % 2) > -2;  ;; Should overflow for z = -115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665640564039457584007913129639936,
-                      ;; but simplified to true  
+                      ;; but simplified to true
 ```
 
 The following are further examples of expressions that should produce integer overflows at the indicated values,
@@ -100,15 +100,15 @@ but the FunC compiler simplifies them to `true` irrespective of the value of `z`
 ```func
 (~(-1) & (-1 * z)) <= 0;         ;; for z = MIN_INT.
 ((1 & (~ 1)) & (z / -1)) <= 0;   ;; for z = MIN_INT.
-((z & 0) & (z * 2)) <= 0;        ;; for z = MAX_INT 
+((z & 0) & (z * 2)) <= 0;        ;; for z = MAX_INT
 ((z * 0) & (z + 1)) <= 0;        ;; for z = MAX_INT.
 (~(-1) * (-1 * z)) <= 0;         ;; for z = MIN_INT
 ((1 & (~ 1)) * (z / -1)) <= 0;   ;; for z = MIN_INT
 ((z & 0) * (z * 2)) <= 0;        ;; for z = MAX_INT
 ((z * 0) * (z + 1)) <= 0;        ;; for z = MAX_INT
 ((-1 * z) % 2) > -2;             ;; for z = MIN_INT
 ((- z) % 2) > -2;                ;; for z = MIN_INT
-((z * 2) % 2) > -2;              ;; for z = MAX_INT 
+((z * 2) % 2) > -2;              ;; for z = MAX_INT
 ((z + 1) % 2) > -2;              ;; for z = MAX_INT
 ```
 
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ The following code produces a stack underflow when `run_method3` executes:
 ```func
 () test(int a, int b, int c) impure method_id(16384) {
    ~dump(a);
-   ~dump(b); 
+   ~dump(b);
    ~dump(c);
 }