Better feedback when mixing argvec/mixin order

[martinklepsch]

It has happened to me a few times now that I got stuck because I put the mixin in the wrong place.

(defc x
  [a b]
  < rum/static
  [:div "bla"])

I think this is something that could be improved to give better feedback.
While throwing an exception isn't guaranteed to be correct the probability of false positives seems low (i.e. component bodies starting with a plain <).

Would you be interested in a patch that throws for the above snippet? Do you have alternative suggestions that might be less absolute?

Maybe throwing an exception is a good first step and can be revisited once there is some user feedback.

[tonsky]

I think it’s a good idea, yes

On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 4:35 AM Martin Klepsch notifications@github.com
wrote:

It has happened to me a few times now that I'm stuck because I put the
mixin in the wrong place.

(defc x
[a b]
< rum/static
[:div "bla"])

I think this is something that could be improved to give better feedback.
While throwing an exception isn't guaranteed to be correct the probability
of false positives seems low (i.e. component bodies starting with a plain
<).

Would you be interested in a patch that throws for the above snippet? Do
you have alternative suggestions that might be less absolute?

Maybe throwing an exception is a good first step and can be revisited once
there is some user feedback.

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#88, or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AARabA3VHXplbUsX3yimr0tVZQZ-rMD8ks5qY9qigaJpZM4JTrLf
.