torproject / tor Public
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug29036 29962 040 #881
Closed
Closed
Bug29036 29962 040 #881
Conversation
This should ensure that GCDA files are never entering the cache of Travis CI. See: https://bugs.torproject.org/29036
Since we have moved coveralls to the script target the entire build will now fail if coveralls fail. We handle it more gracefully by echo'ing the failure instead of doing a hard-failure. See: https://bugs.torproject.org/29036
…nges file Otherwise, "make check-changes" will complain when we backport the change.
Also, refrain from caching target/. See: https://levans.fr/rust_travis_cache.html
And add some useful comments
Merge the moved coverage line from 29036 with the stem changes in maint-0.3.5.
|
This pull request had the wrong merge head due to a GitHub UI bug, see #880 for details. |
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 4584
|
We need to keep the gcno files, because they are created at compile time.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: