Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update #197

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

update #197

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Aug 2, 2015

No description provided.

@ghost ghost closed this Aug 2, 2015
apxii pushed a commit to apxii/linux that referenced this pull request Jun 11, 2016
laijs pushed a commit to laijs/linux that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2017
 lkl: Fix ipv6 netperf failure
Noltari pushed a commit to Noltari/linux that referenced this pull request Jul 5, 2017
commit d855086 upstream.

When the scheduler sets TIF_NEED_RESCHED & we call into the scheduler
from arch/mips/kernel/entry.S we disable interrupts. This is true
regardless of whether we reach work_resched from syscall_exit_work,
resume_userspace or by looping after calling schedule(). Although we
disable interrupts in these paths we don't call trace_hardirqs_off()
before calling into C code which may acquire locks, and we therefore
leave lockdep with an inconsistent view of whether interrupts are
disabled or not when CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING & CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP are
both enabled.

Without tracing this interrupt state lockdep will print warnings such
as the following once a task returns from a syscall via
syscall_exit_partial with TIF_NEED_RESCHED set:

[   49.927678] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[   49.934445] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3687 check_flags.part.41+0x1dc/0x1e8
[   49.946031] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(current->hardirqs_enabled)
[   49.946355] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted 4.10.0-00439-gc9fd5d362289-dirty torvalds#197
[   49.963505] Stack : 0000000000000000 ffffffff81bb5d6a 0000000000000006 ffffffff801ce9c4
[   49.974431]         0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 000000000000004a
[   49.985300]         ffffffff80b7e487 ffffffff80a24498 a8000000ff160000 ffffffff80ede8b8
[   49.996194]         0000000000000001 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000077c8030c
[   50.007063]         000000007fd8a510 ffffffff801cd45c 0000000000000000 a8000000ff127c88
[   50.017945]         0000000000000000 ffffffff801cf928 0000000000000001 ffffffff80a24498
[   50.028827]         0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
[   50.039688]         0000000000000000 a8000000ff127bd0 0000000000000000 ffffffff805509bc
[   50.050575]         00000000140084e0 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000040a00
[   50.061448]         0000000000000000 ffffffff8010e1b0 0000000000000000 ffffffff805509bc
[   50.072327]         ...
[   50.076087] Call Trace:
[   50.079869] [<ffffffff8010e1b0>] show_stack+0x80/0xa8
[   50.086577] [<ffffffff805509bc>] dump_stack+0x10c/0x190
[   50.093498] [<ffffffff8015dde0>] __warn+0xf0/0x108
[   50.099889] [<ffffffff8015de34>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x3c/0x48
[   50.107241] [<ffffffff801c15b4>] check_flags.part.41+0x1dc/0x1e8
[   50.114961] [<ffffffff801c239c>] lock_is_held_type+0x8c/0xb0
[   50.122291] [<ffffffff809461b8>] __schedule+0x8c0/0x10f8
[   50.129221] [<ffffffff80946a60>] schedule+0x30/0x98
[   50.135659] [<ffffffff80106278>] work_resched+0x8/0x34
[   50.142397] ---[ end trace 0cb4f6ef5b99fe21 ]---
[   50.148405] possible reason: unannotated irqs-off.
[   50.154600] irq event stamp: 400463
[   50.159566] hardirqs last  enabled at (400463): [<ffffffff8094edc8>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x40/0xa8
[   50.171981] hardirqs last disabled at (400462): [<ffffffff8094eb98>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x30/0xb0
[   50.183897] softirqs last  enabled at (400450): [<ffffffff8016580c>] __do_softirq+0x4ac/0x6a8
[   50.195015] softirqs last disabled at (400425): [<ffffffff80165e78>] irq_exit+0x110/0x128

Fix this by using the TRACE_IRQS_OFF macro to call trace_hardirqs_off()
when CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS is enabled. This is done before invoking
schedule() following the work_resched label because:

 1) Interrupts are disabled regardless of the path we take to reach
    work_resched() & schedule().

 2) Performing the tracing here avoids the need to do it in paths which
    disable interrupts but don't call out to C code before hitting a
    path which uses the RESTORE_SOME macro that will call
    trace_hardirqs_on() or trace_hardirqs_off() as appropriate.

We call trace_hardirqs_on() using the TRACE_IRQS_ON macro before calling
syscall_trace_leave() for similar reasons, ensuring that lockdep has a
consistent view of state after we re-enable interrupts.

Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com>
Fixes: 1da177e ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/15385/
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Noltari pushed a commit to Noltari/linux that referenced this pull request Jul 5, 2017
commit d855086 upstream.

When the scheduler sets TIF_NEED_RESCHED & we call into the scheduler
from arch/mips/kernel/entry.S we disable interrupts. This is true
regardless of whether we reach work_resched from syscall_exit_work,
resume_userspace or by looping after calling schedule(). Although we
disable interrupts in these paths we don't call trace_hardirqs_off()
before calling into C code which may acquire locks, and we therefore
leave lockdep with an inconsistent view of whether interrupts are
disabled or not when CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING & CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP are
both enabled.

Without tracing this interrupt state lockdep will print warnings such
as the following once a task returns from a syscall via
syscall_exit_partial with TIF_NEED_RESCHED set:

[   49.927678] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[   49.934445] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3687 check_flags.part.41+0x1dc/0x1e8
[   49.946031] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(current->hardirqs_enabled)
[   49.946355] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted 4.10.0-00439-gc9fd5d362289-dirty torvalds#197
[   49.963505] Stack : 0000000000000000 ffffffff81bb5d6a 0000000000000006 ffffffff801ce9c4
[   49.974431]         0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 000000000000004a
[   49.985300]         ffffffff80b7e487 ffffffff80a24498 a8000000ff160000 ffffffff80ede8b8
[   49.996194]         0000000000000001 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000077c8030c
[   50.007063]         000000007fd8a510 ffffffff801cd45c 0000000000000000 a8000000ff127c88
[   50.017945]         0000000000000000 ffffffff801cf928 0000000000000001 ffffffff80a24498
[   50.028827]         0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
[   50.039688]         0000000000000000 a8000000ff127bd0 0000000000000000 ffffffff805509bc
[   50.050575]         00000000140084e0 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000040a00
[   50.061448]         0000000000000000 ffffffff8010e1b0 0000000000000000 ffffffff805509bc
[   50.072327]         ...
[   50.076087] Call Trace:
[   50.079869] [<ffffffff8010e1b0>] show_stack+0x80/0xa8
[   50.086577] [<ffffffff805509bc>] dump_stack+0x10c/0x190
[   50.093498] [<ffffffff8015dde0>] __warn+0xf0/0x108
[   50.099889] [<ffffffff8015de34>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x3c/0x48
[   50.107241] [<ffffffff801c15b4>] check_flags.part.41+0x1dc/0x1e8
[   50.114961] [<ffffffff801c239c>] lock_is_held_type+0x8c/0xb0
[   50.122291] [<ffffffff809461b8>] __schedule+0x8c0/0x10f8
[   50.129221] [<ffffffff80946a60>] schedule+0x30/0x98
[   50.135659] [<ffffffff80106278>] work_resched+0x8/0x34
[   50.142397] ---[ end trace 0cb4f6ef5b99fe21 ]---
[   50.148405] possible reason: unannotated irqs-off.
[   50.154600] irq event stamp: 400463
[   50.159566] hardirqs last  enabled at (400463): [<ffffffff8094edc8>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x40/0xa8
[   50.171981] hardirqs last disabled at (400462): [<ffffffff8094eb98>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x30/0xb0
[   50.183897] softirqs last  enabled at (400450): [<ffffffff8016580c>] __do_softirq+0x4ac/0x6a8
[   50.195015] softirqs last disabled at (400425): [<ffffffff80165e78>] irq_exit+0x110/0x128

Fix this by using the TRACE_IRQS_OFF macro to call trace_hardirqs_off()
when CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS is enabled. This is done before invoking
schedule() following the work_resched label because:

 1) Interrupts are disabled regardless of the path we take to reach
    work_resched() & schedule().

 2) Performing the tracing here avoids the need to do it in paths which
    disable interrupts but don't call out to C code before hitting a
    path which uses the RESTORE_SOME macro that will call
    trace_hardirqs_on() or trace_hardirqs_off() as appropriate.

We call trace_hardirqs_on() using the TRACE_IRQS_ON macro before calling
syscall_trace_leave() for similar reasons, ensuring that lockdep has a
consistent view of state after we re-enable interrupts.

Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com>
Fixes: 1da177e ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/15385/
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
bgilbert referenced this pull request in coreos/linux Jul 5, 2017
commit d855086 upstream.

When the scheduler sets TIF_NEED_RESCHED & we call into the scheduler
from arch/mips/kernel/entry.S we disable interrupts. This is true
regardless of whether we reach work_resched from syscall_exit_work,
resume_userspace or by looping after calling schedule(). Although we
disable interrupts in these paths we don't call trace_hardirqs_off()
before calling into C code which may acquire locks, and we therefore
leave lockdep with an inconsistent view of whether interrupts are
disabled or not when CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING & CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP are
both enabled.

Without tracing this interrupt state lockdep will print warnings such
as the following once a task returns from a syscall via
syscall_exit_partial with TIF_NEED_RESCHED set:

[   49.927678] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[   49.934445] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3687 check_flags.part.41+0x1dc/0x1e8
[   49.946031] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(current->hardirqs_enabled)
[   49.946355] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted 4.10.0-00439-gc9fd5d362289-dirty #197
[   49.963505] Stack : 0000000000000000 ffffffff81bb5d6a 0000000000000006 ffffffff801ce9c4
[   49.974431]         0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 000000000000004a
[   49.985300]         ffffffff80b7e487 ffffffff80a24498 a8000000ff160000 ffffffff80ede8b8
[   49.996194]         0000000000000001 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000077c8030c
[   50.007063]         000000007fd8a510 ffffffff801cd45c 0000000000000000 a8000000ff127c88
[   50.017945]         0000000000000000 ffffffff801cf928 0000000000000001 ffffffff80a24498
[   50.028827]         0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
[   50.039688]         0000000000000000 a8000000ff127bd0 0000000000000000 ffffffff805509bc
[   50.050575]         00000000140084e0 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000040a00
[   50.061448]         0000000000000000 ffffffff8010e1b0 0000000000000000 ffffffff805509bc
[   50.072327]         ...
[   50.076087] Call Trace:
[   50.079869] [<ffffffff8010e1b0>] show_stack+0x80/0xa8
[   50.086577] [<ffffffff805509bc>] dump_stack+0x10c/0x190
[   50.093498] [<ffffffff8015dde0>] __warn+0xf0/0x108
[   50.099889] [<ffffffff8015de34>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x3c/0x48
[   50.107241] [<ffffffff801c15b4>] check_flags.part.41+0x1dc/0x1e8
[   50.114961] [<ffffffff801c239c>] lock_is_held_type+0x8c/0xb0
[   50.122291] [<ffffffff809461b8>] __schedule+0x8c0/0x10f8
[   50.129221] [<ffffffff80946a60>] schedule+0x30/0x98
[   50.135659] [<ffffffff80106278>] work_resched+0x8/0x34
[   50.142397] ---[ end trace 0cb4f6ef5b99fe21 ]---
[   50.148405] possible reason: unannotated irqs-off.
[   50.154600] irq event stamp: 400463
[   50.159566] hardirqs last  enabled at (400463): [<ffffffff8094edc8>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x40/0xa8
[   50.171981] hardirqs last disabled at (400462): [<ffffffff8094eb98>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x30/0xb0
[   50.183897] softirqs last  enabled at (400450): [<ffffffff8016580c>] __do_softirq+0x4ac/0x6a8
[   50.195015] softirqs last disabled at (400425): [<ffffffff80165e78>] irq_exit+0x110/0x128

Fix this by using the TRACE_IRQS_OFF macro to call trace_hardirqs_off()
when CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS is enabled. This is done before invoking
schedule() following the work_resched label because:

 1) Interrupts are disabled regardless of the path we take to reach
    work_resched() & schedule().

 2) Performing the tracing here avoids the need to do it in paths which
    disable interrupts but don't call out to C code before hitting a
    path which uses the RESTORE_SOME macro that will call
    trace_hardirqs_on() or trace_hardirqs_off() as appropriate.

We call trace_hardirqs_on() using the TRACE_IRQS_ON macro before calling
syscall_trace_leave() for similar reasons, ensuring that lockdep has a
consistent view of state after we re-enable interrupts.

Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com>
Fixes: 1da177e ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/15385/
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
norov pushed a commit to norov/linux that referenced this pull request Jul 24, 2017
When the scheduler sets TIF_NEED_RESCHED & we call into the scheduler
from arch/mips/kernel/entry.S we disable interrupts. This is true
regardless of whether we reach work_resched from syscall_exit_work,
resume_userspace or by looping after calling schedule(). Although we
disable interrupts in these paths we don't call trace_hardirqs_off()
before calling into C code which may acquire locks, and we therefore
leave lockdep with an inconsistent view of whether interrupts are
disabled or not when CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING & CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP are
both enabled.

Without tracing this interrupt state lockdep will print warnings such
as the following once a task returns from a syscall via
syscall_exit_partial with TIF_NEED_RESCHED set:

[   49.927678] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[   49.934445] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3687 check_flags.part.41+0x1dc/0x1e8
[   49.946031] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(current->hardirqs_enabled)
[   49.946355] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted 4.10.0-00439-gc9fd5d362289-dirty torvalds#197
[   49.963505] Stack : 0000000000000000 ffffffff81bb5d6a 0000000000000006 ffffffff801ce9c4
[   49.974431]         0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 000000000000004a
[   49.985300]         ffffffff80b7e487 ffffffff80a24498 a8000000ff160000 ffffffff80ede8b8
[   49.996194]         0000000000000001 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000077c8030c
[   50.007063]         000000007fd8a510 ffffffff801cd45c 0000000000000000 a8000000ff127c88
[   50.017945]         0000000000000000 ffffffff801cf928 0000000000000001 ffffffff80a24498
[   50.028827]         0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
[   50.039688]         0000000000000000 a8000000ff127bd0 0000000000000000 ffffffff805509bc
[   50.050575]         00000000140084e0 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000040a00
[   50.061448]         0000000000000000 ffffffff8010e1b0 0000000000000000 ffffffff805509bc
[   50.072327]         ...
[   50.076087] Call Trace:
[   50.079869] [<ffffffff8010e1b0>] show_stack+0x80/0xa8
[   50.086577] [<ffffffff805509bc>] dump_stack+0x10c/0x190
[   50.093498] [<ffffffff8015dde0>] __warn+0xf0/0x108
[   50.099889] [<ffffffff8015de34>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x3c/0x48
[   50.107241] [<ffffffff801c15b4>] check_flags.part.41+0x1dc/0x1e8
[   50.114961] [<ffffffff801c239c>] lock_is_held_type+0x8c/0xb0
[   50.122291] [<ffffffff809461b8>] __schedule+0x8c0/0x10f8
[   50.129221] [<ffffffff80946a60>] schedule+0x30/0x98
[   50.135659] [<ffffffff80106278>] work_resched+0x8/0x34
[   50.142397] ---[ end trace 0cb4f6ef5b99fe21 ]---
[   50.148405] possible reason: unannotated irqs-off.
[   50.154600] irq event stamp: 400463
[   50.159566] hardirqs last  enabled at (400463): [<ffffffff8094edc8>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x40/0xa8
[   50.171981] hardirqs last disabled at (400462): [<ffffffff8094eb98>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x30/0xb0
[   50.183897] softirqs last  enabled at (400450): [<ffffffff8016580c>] __do_softirq+0x4ac/0x6a8
[   50.195015] softirqs last disabled at (400425): [<ffffffff80165e78>] irq_exit+0x110/0x128

Fix this by using the TRACE_IRQS_OFF macro to call trace_hardirqs_off()
when CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS is enabled. This is done before invoking
schedule() following the work_resched label because:

 1) Interrupts are disabled regardless of the path we take to reach
    work_resched() & schedule().

 2) Performing the tracing here avoids the need to do it in paths which
    disable interrupts but don't call out to C code before hitting a
    path which uses the RESTORE_SOME macro that will call
    trace_hardirqs_on() or trace_hardirqs_off() as appropriate.

We call trace_hardirqs_on() using the TRACE_IRQS_ON macro before calling
syscall_trace_leave() for similar reasons, ensuring that lockdep has a
consistent view of state after we re-enable interrupts.

Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com>
Fixes: 1da177e ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/15385/
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
dcui pushed a commit to dcui/linux that referenced this pull request Aug 1, 2017
BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1702515

commit d855086 upstream.

When the scheduler sets TIF_NEED_RESCHED & we call into the scheduler
from arch/mips/kernel/entry.S we disable interrupts. This is true
regardless of whether we reach work_resched from syscall_exit_work,
resume_userspace or by looping after calling schedule(). Although we
disable interrupts in these paths we don't call trace_hardirqs_off()
before calling into C code which may acquire locks, and we therefore
leave lockdep with an inconsistent view of whether interrupts are
disabled or not when CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING & CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP are
both enabled.

Without tracing this interrupt state lockdep will print warnings such
as the following once a task returns from a syscall via
syscall_exit_partial with TIF_NEED_RESCHED set:

[   49.927678] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[   49.934445] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3687 check_flags.part.41+0x1dc/0x1e8
[   49.946031] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(current->hardirqs_enabled)
[   49.946355] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted 4.10.0-00439-gc9fd5d362289-dirty torvalds#197
[   49.963505] Stack : 0000000000000000 ffffffff81bb5d6a 0000000000000006 ffffffff801ce9c4
[   49.974431]         0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 000000000000004a
[   49.985300]         ffffffff80b7e487 ffffffff80a24498 a8000000ff160000 ffffffff80ede8b8
[   49.996194]         0000000000000001 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000077c8030c
[   50.007063]         000000007fd8a510 ffffffff801cd45c 0000000000000000 a8000000ff127c88
[   50.017945]         0000000000000000 ffffffff801cf928 0000000000000001 ffffffff80a24498
[   50.028827]         0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
[   50.039688]         0000000000000000 a8000000ff127bd0 0000000000000000 ffffffff805509bc
[   50.050575]         00000000140084e0 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000040a00
[   50.061448]         0000000000000000 ffffffff8010e1b0 0000000000000000 ffffffff805509bc
[   50.072327]         ...
[   50.076087] Call Trace:
[   50.079869] [<ffffffff8010e1b0>] show_stack+0x80/0xa8
[   50.086577] [<ffffffff805509bc>] dump_stack+0x10c/0x190
[   50.093498] [<ffffffff8015dde0>] __warn+0xf0/0x108
[   50.099889] [<ffffffff8015de34>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x3c/0x48
[   50.107241] [<ffffffff801c15b4>] check_flags.part.41+0x1dc/0x1e8
[   50.114961] [<ffffffff801c239c>] lock_is_held_type+0x8c/0xb0
[   50.122291] [<ffffffff809461b8>] __schedule+0x8c0/0x10f8
[   50.129221] [<ffffffff80946a60>] schedule+0x30/0x98
[   50.135659] [<ffffffff80106278>] work_resched+0x8/0x34
[   50.142397] ---[ end trace 0cb4f6ef5b99fe21 ]---
[   50.148405] possible reason: unannotated irqs-off.
[   50.154600] irq event stamp: 400463
[   50.159566] hardirqs last  enabled at (400463): [<ffffffff8094edc8>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x40/0xa8
[   50.171981] hardirqs last disabled at (400462): [<ffffffff8094eb98>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x30/0xb0
[   50.183897] softirqs last  enabled at (400450): [<ffffffff8016580c>] __do_softirq+0x4ac/0x6a8
[   50.195015] softirqs last disabled at (400425): [<ffffffff80165e78>] irq_exit+0x110/0x128

Fix this by using the TRACE_IRQS_OFF macro to call trace_hardirqs_off()
when CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS is enabled. This is done before invoking
schedule() following the work_resched label because:

 1) Interrupts are disabled regardless of the path we take to reach
    work_resched() & schedule().

 2) Performing the tracing here avoids the need to do it in paths which
    disable interrupts but don't call out to C code before hitting a
    path which uses the RESTORE_SOME macro that will call
    trace_hardirqs_on() or trace_hardirqs_off() as appropriate.

We call trace_hardirqs_on() using the TRACE_IRQS_ON macro before calling
syscall_trace_leave() for similar reasons, ensuring that lockdep has a
consistent view of state after we re-enable interrupts.

Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com>
Fixes: 1da177e ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/15385/
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
Noltari pushed a commit to Noltari/linux that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2017
[ Upstream commit d855086 ]

When the scheduler sets TIF_NEED_RESCHED & we call into the scheduler
from arch/mips/kernel/entry.S we disable interrupts. This is true
regardless of whether we reach work_resched from syscall_exit_work,
resume_userspace or by looping after calling schedule(). Although we
disable interrupts in these paths we don't call trace_hardirqs_off()
before calling into C code which may acquire locks, and we therefore
leave lockdep with an inconsistent view of whether interrupts are
disabled or not when CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING & CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP are
both enabled.

Without tracing this interrupt state lockdep will print warnings such
as the following once a task returns from a syscall via
syscall_exit_partial with TIF_NEED_RESCHED set:

[   49.927678] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[   49.934445] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3687 check_flags.part.41+0x1dc/0x1e8
[   49.946031] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(current->hardirqs_enabled)
[   49.946355] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted 4.10.0-00439-gc9fd5d362289-dirty torvalds#197
[   49.963505] Stack : 0000000000000000 ffffffff81bb5d6a 0000000000000006 ffffffff801ce9c4
[   49.974431]         0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 000000000000004a
[   49.985300]         ffffffff80b7e487 ffffffff80a24498 a8000000ff160000 ffffffff80ede8b8
[   49.996194]         0000000000000001 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000077c8030c
[   50.007063]         000000007fd8a510 ffffffff801cd45c 0000000000000000 a8000000ff127c88
[   50.017945]         0000000000000000 ffffffff801cf928 0000000000000001 ffffffff80a24498
[   50.028827]         0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
[   50.039688]         0000000000000000 a8000000ff127bd0 0000000000000000 ffffffff805509bc
[   50.050575]         00000000140084e0 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000040a00
[   50.061448]         0000000000000000 ffffffff8010e1b0 0000000000000000 ffffffff805509bc
[   50.072327]         ...
[   50.076087] Call Trace:
[   50.079869] [<ffffffff8010e1b0>] show_stack+0x80/0xa8
[   50.086577] [<ffffffff805509bc>] dump_stack+0x10c/0x190
[   50.093498] [<ffffffff8015dde0>] __warn+0xf0/0x108
[   50.099889] [<ffffffff8015de34>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x3c/0x48
[   50.107241] [<ffffffff801c15b4>] check_flags.part.41+0x1dc/0x1e8
[   50.114961] [<ffffffff801c239c>] lock_is_held_type+0x8c/0xb0
[   50.122291] [<ffffffff809461b8>] __schedule+0x8c0/0x10f8
[   50.129221] [<ffffffff80946a60>] schedule+0x30/0x98
[   50.135659] [<ffffffff80106278>] work_resched+0x8/0x34
[   50.142397] ---[ end trace 0cb4f6ef5b99fe21 ]---
[   50.148405] possible reason: unannotated irqs-off.
[   50.154600] irq event stamp: 400463
[   50.159566] hardirqs last  enabled at (400463): [<ffffffff8094edc8>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x40/0xa8
[   50.171981] hardirqs last disabled at (400462): [<ffffffff8094eb98>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x30/0xb0
[   50.183897] softirqs last  enabled at (400450): [<ffffffff8016580c>] __do_softirq+0x4ac/0x6a8
[   50.195015] softirqs last disabled at (400425): [<ffffffff80165e78>] irq_exit+0x110/0x128

Fix this by using the TRACE_IRQS_OFF macro to call trace_hardirqs_off()
when CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS is enabled. This is done before invoking
schedule() following the work_resched label because:

 1) Interrupts are disabled regardless of the path we take to reach
    work_resched() & schedule().

 2) Performing the tracing here avoids the need to do it in paths which
    disable interrupts but don't call out to C code before hitting a
    path which uses the RESTORE_SOME macro that will call
    trace_hardirqs_on() or trace_hardirqs_off() as appropriate.

We call trace_hardirqs_on() using the TRACE_IRQS_ON macro before calling
syscall_trace_leave() for similar reasons, ensuring that lockdep has a
consistent view of state after we re-enable interrupts.

Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com>
Fixes: 1da177e ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/15385/
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com>
bgly pushed a commit to powervm/ibmvscsis that referenced this pull request Aug 18, 2017
BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1702863

commit d855086 upstream.

When the scheduler sets TIF_NEED_RESCHED & we call into the scheduler
from arch/mips/kernel/entry.S we disable interrupts. This is true
regardless of whether we reach work_resched from syscall_exit_work,
resume_userspace or by looping after calling schedule(). Although we
disable interrupts in these paths we don't call trace_hardirqs_off()
before calling into C code which may acquire locks, and we therefore
leave lockdep with an inconsistent view of whether interrupts are
disabled or not when CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING & CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP are
both enabled.

Without tracing this interrupt state lockdep will print warnings such
as the following once a task returns from a syscall via
syscall_exit_partial with TIF_NEED_RESCHED set:

[   49.927678] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[   49.934445] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3687 check_flags.part.41+0x1dc/0x1e8
[   49.946031] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(current->hardirqs_enabled)
[   49.946355] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted 4.10.0-00439-gc9fd5d362289-dirty torvalds#197
[   49.963505] Stack : 0000000000000000 ffffffff81bb5d6a 0000000000000006 ffffffff801ce9c4
[   49.974431]         0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 000000000000004a
[   49.985300]         ffffffff80b7e487 ffffffff80a24498 a8000000ff160000 ffffffff80ede8b8
[   49.996194]         0000000000000001 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000077c8030c
[   50.007063]         000000007fd8a510 ffffffff801cd45c 0000000000000000 a8000000ff127c88
[   50.017945]         0000000000000000 ffffffff801cf928 0000000000000001 ffffffff80a24498
[   50.028827]         0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
[   50.039688]         0000000000000000 a8000000ff127bd0 0000000000000000 ffffffff805509bc
[   50.050575]         00000000140084e0 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000040a00
[   50.061448]         0000000000000000 ffffffff8010e1b0 0000000000000000 ffffffff805509bc
[   50.072327]         ...
[   50.076087] Call Trace:
[   50.079869] [<ffffffff8010e1b0>] show_stack+0x80/0xa8
[   50.086577] [<ffffffff805509bc>] dump_stack+0x10c/0x190
[   50.093498] [<ffffffff8015dde0>] __warn+0xf0/0x108
[   50.099889] [<ffffffff8015de34>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x3c/0x48
[   50.107241] [<ffffffff801c15b4>] check_flags.part.41+0x1dc/0x1e8
[   50.114961] [<ffffffff801c239c>] lock_is_held_type+0x8c/0xb0
[   50.122291] [<ffffffff809461b8>] __schedule+0x8c0/0x10f8
[   50.129221] [<ffffffff80946a60>] schedule+0x30/0x98
[   50.135659] [<ffffffff80106278>] work_resched+0x8/0x34
[   50.142397] ---[ end trace 0cb4f6ef5b99fe21 ]---
[   50.148405] possible reason: unannotated irqs-off.
[   50.154600] irq event stamp: 400463
[   50.159566] hardirqs last  enabled at (400463): [<ffffffff8094edc8>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x40/0xa8
[   50.171981] hardirqs last disabled at (400462): [<ffffffff8094eb98>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x30/0xb0
[   50.183897] softirqs last  enabled at (400450): [<ffffffff8016580c>] __do_softirq+0x4ac/0x6a8
[   50.195015] softirqs last disabled at (400425): [<ffffffff80165e78>] irq_exit+0x110/0x128

Fix this by using the TRACE_IRQS_OFF macro to call trace_hardirqs_off()
when CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS is enabled. This is done before invoking
schedule() following the work_resched label because:

 1) Interrupts are disabled regardless of the path we take to reach
    work_resched() & schedule().

 2) Performing the tracing here avoids the need to do it in paths which
    disable interrupts but don't call out to C code before hitting a
    path which uses the RESTORE_SOME macro that will call
    trace_hardirqs_on() or trace_hardirqs_off() as appropriate.

We call trace_hardirqs_on() using the TRACE_IRQS_ON macro before calling
syscall_trace_leave() for similar reasons, ensuring that lockdep has a
consistent view of state after we re-enable interrupts.

Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com>
Fixes: 1da177e ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/15385/
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@canonical.com>
Noltari pushed a commit to Noltari/linux that referenced this pull request Sep 15, 2017
commit d855086 upstream.

When the scheduler sets TIF_NEED_RESCHED & we call into the scheduler
from arch/mips/kernel/entry.S we disable interrupts. This is true
regardless of whether we reach work_resched from syscall_exit_work,
resume_userspace or by looping after calling schedule(). Although we
disable interrupts in these paths we don't call trace_hardirqs_off()
before calling into C code which may acquire locks, and we therefore
leave lockdep with an inconsistent view of whether interrupts are
disabled or not when CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING & CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP are
both enabled.

Without tracing this interrupt state lockdep will print warnings such
as the following once a task returns from a syscall via
syscall_exit_partial with TIF_NEED_RESCHED set:

[   49.927678] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[   49.934445] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3687 check_flags.part.41+0x1dc/0x1e8
[   49.946031] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(current->hardirqs_enabled)
[   49.946355] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted 4.10.0-00439-gc9fd5d362289-dirty torvalds#197
[   49.963505] Stack : 0000000000000000 ffffffff81bb5d6a 0000000000000006 ffffffff801ce9c4
[   49.974431]         0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 000000000000004a
[   49.985300]         ffffffff80b7e487 ffffffff80a24498 a8000000ff160000 ffffffff80ede8b8
[   49.996194]         0000000000000001 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000077c8030c
[   50.007063]         000000007fd8a510 ffffffff801cd45c 0000000000000000 a8000000ff127c88
[   50.017945]         0000000000000000 ffffffff801cf928 0000000000000001 ffffffff80a24498
[   50.028827]         0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
[   50.039688]         0000000000000000 a8000000ff127bd0 0000000000000000 ffffffff805509bc
[   50.050575]         00000000140084e0 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000040a00
[   50.061448]         0000000000000000 ffffffff8010e1b0 0000000000000000 ffffffff805509bc
[   50.072327]         ...
[   50.076087] Call Trace:
[   50.079869] [<ffffffff8010e1b0>] show_stack+0x80/0xa8
[   50.086577] [<ffffffff805509bc>] dump_stack+0x10c/0x190
[   50.093498] [<ffffffff8015dde0>] __warn+0xf0/0x108
[   50.099889] [<ffffffff8015de34>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x3c/0x48
[   50.107241] [<ffffffff801c15b4>] check_flags.part.41+0x1dc/0x1e8
[   50.114961] [<ffffffff801c239c>] lock_is_held_type+0x8c/0xb0
[   50.122291] [<ffffffff809461b8>] __schedule+0x8c0/0x10f8
[   50.129221] [<ffffffff80946a60>] schedule+0x30/0x98
[   50.135659] [<ffffffff80106278>] work_resched+0x8/0x34
[   50.142397] ---[ end trace 0cb4f6ef5b99fe21 ]---
[   50.148405] possible reason: unannotated irqs-off.
[   50.154600] irq event stamp: 400463
[   50.159566] hardirqs last  enabled at (400463): [<ffffffff8094edc8>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x40/0xa8
[   50.171981] hardirqs last disabled at (400462): [<ffffffff8094eb98>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x30/0xb0
[   50.183897] softirqs last  enabled at (400450): [<ffffffff8016580c>] __do_softirq+0x4ac/0x6a8
[   50.195015] softirqs last disabled at (400425): [<ffffffff80165e78>] irq_exit+0x110/0x128

Fix this by using the TRACE_IRQS_OFF macro to call trace_hardirqs_off()
when CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS is enabled. This is done before invoking
schedule() following the work_resched label because:

 1) Interrupts are disabled regardless of the path we take to reach
    work_resched() & schedule().

 2) Performing the tracing here avoids the need to do it in paths which
    disable interrupts but don't call out to C code before hitting a
    path which uses the RESTORE_SOME macro that will call
    trace_hardirqs_on() or trace_hardirqs_off() as appropriate.

We call trace_hardirqs_on() using the TRACE_IRQS_ON macro before calling
syscall_trace_leave() for similar reasons, ensuring that lockdep has a
consistent view of state after we re-enable interrupts.

Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com>
Fixes: 1da177e ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/15385/
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
fengguang pushed a commit to 0day-ci/linux that referenced this pull request Jul 6, 2019
…-fixes

WARNING: 'implemntation' may be misspelled - perhaps 'implementation'?
torvalds#8:
rb_leftmost was wired deeper into the implemntation, but there were some

ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
torvalds#180: FILE: include/linux/rbtree.h:130:
+#define RB_ROOT_CACHED (struct rb_root_cached) { {NULL, }, NULL }

ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
torvalds#183: FILE: include/linux/rbtree.h:133:
+#define rb_first_cached(root) (root)->rb_leftmost

ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
torvalds#197: FILE: include/linux/rbtree.h:147:
+        if (root->rb_leftmost == node)$

WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line
torvalds#197: FILE: include/linux/rbtree.h:147:
+        if (root->rb_leftmost == node)$

ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
torvalds#198: FILE: include/linux/rbtree.h:148:
+                root->rb_leftmost = rb_next(node);$

WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line
torvalds#198: FILE: include/linux/rbtree.h:148:
+                root->rb_leftmost = rb_next(node);$

total: 4 errors, 3 warnings, 246 lines checked

NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
      mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.

NOTE: Whitespace errors detected.
      You may wish to use scripts/cleanpatch or scripts/cleanfile

./patches/rbtree-avoid-generating-code-twice-for-the-cached-versions.patch has style problems, please review.

NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
      them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.

Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches

Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
byteporter pushed a commit to byteporter/linux that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2019
…-fixes

WARNING: 'implemntation' may be misspelled - perhaps 'implementation'?
torvalds#8:
rb_leftmost was wired deeper into the implemntation, but there were some

ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
torvalds#180: FILE: include/linux/rbtree.h:130:
+#define RB_ROOT_CACHED (struct rb_root_cached) { {NULL, }, NULL }

ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
torvalds#183: FILE: include/linux/rbtree.h:133:
+#define rb_first_cached(root) (root)->rb_leftmost

ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
torvalds#197: FILE: include/linux/rbtree.h:147:
+        if (root->rb_leftmost == node)$

WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line
torvalds#197: FILE: include/linux/rbtree.h:147:
+        if (root->rb_leftmost == node)$

ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
torvalds#198: FILE: include/linux/rbtree.h:148:
+                root->rb_leftmost = rb_next(node);$

WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line
torvalds#198: FILE: include/linux/rbtree.h:148:
+                root->rb_leftmost = rb_next(node);$

total: 4 errors, 3 warnings, 246 lines checked

NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
      mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.

NOTE: Whitespace errors detected.
      You may wish to use scripts/cleanpatch or scripts/cleanfile

./patches/rbtree-avoid-generating-code-twice-for-the-cached-versions.patch has style problems, please review.

NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
      them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.

Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches

Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
xdarklight pushed a commit to xdarklight/linux that referenced this pull request Jul 9, 2019
…-fixes

WARNING: 'implemntation' may be misspelled - perhaps 'implementation'?
torvalds#8:
rb_leftmost was wired deeper into the implemntation, but there were some

ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
torvalds#180: FILE: include/linux/rbtree.h:130:
+#define RB_ROOT_CACHED (struct rb_root_cached) { {NULL, }, NULL }

ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
torvalds#183: FILE: include/linux/rbtree.h:133:
+#define rb_first_cached(root) (root)->rb_leftmost

ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
torvalds#197: FILE: include/linux/rbtree.h:147:
+        if (root->rb_leftmost == node)$

WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line
torvalds#197: FILE: include/linux/rbtree.h:147:
+        if (root->rb_leftmost == node)$

ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
torvalds#198: FILE: include/linux/rbtree.h:148:
+                root->rb_leftmost = rb_next(node);$

WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line
torvalds#198: FILE: include/linux/rbtree.h:148:
+                root->rb_leftmost = rb_next(node);$

total: 4 errors, 3 warnings, 246 lines checked

NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
      mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.

NOTE: Whitespace errors detected.
      You may wish to use scripts/cleanpatch or scripts/cleanfile

./patches/rbtree-avoid-generating-code-twice-for-the-cached-versions.patch has style problems, please review.

NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
      them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.

Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches

Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
fengguang pushed a commit to 0day-ci/linux that referenced this pull request Jul 10, 2019
…-fixes

WARNING: 'implemntation' may be misspelled - perhaps 'implementation'?
torvalds#8:
rb_leftmost was wired deeper into the implemntation, but there were some

ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
torvalds#180: FILE: include/linux/rbtree.h:130:
+#define RB_ROOT_CACHED (struct rb_root_cached) { {NULL, }, NULL }

ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
torvalds#183: FILE: include/linux/rbtree.h:133:
+#define rb_first_cached(root) (root)->rb_leftmost

ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
torvalds#197: FILE: include/linux/rbtree.h:147:
+        if (root->rb_leftmost == node)$

WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line
torvalds#197: FILE: include/linux/rbtree.h:147:
+        if (root->rb_leftmost == node)$

ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
torvalds#198: FILE: include/linux/rbtree.h:148:
+                root->rb_leftmost = rb_next(node);$

WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line
torvalds#198: FILE: include/linux/rbtree.h:148:
+                root->rb_leftmost = rb_next(node);$

total: 4 errors, 3 warnings, 246 lines checked

NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
      mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.

NOTE: Whitespace errors detected.
      You may wish to use scripts/cleanpatch or scripts/cleanfile

./patches/rbtree-avoid-generating-code-twice-for-the-cached-versions.patch has style problems, please review.

NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
      them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.

Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches

Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
xdarklight pushed a commit to xdarklight/linux that referenced this pull request Jul 11, 2019
…-fixes

WARNING: 'implemntation' may be misspelled - perhaps 'implementation'?
torvalds#8:
rb_leftmost was wired deeper into the implemntation, but there were some

ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
torvalds#180: FILE: include/linux/rbtree.h:130:
+#define RB_ROOT_CACHED (struct rb_root_cached) { {NULL, }, NULL }

ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
torvalds#183: FILE: include/linux/rbtree.h:133:
+#define rb_first_cached(root) (root)->rb_leftmost

ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
torvalds#197: FILE: include/linux/rbtree.h:147:
+        if (root->rb_leftmost == node)$

WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line
torvalds#197: FILE: include/linux/rbtree.h:147:
+        if (root->rb_leftmost == node)$

ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
torvalds#198: FILE: include/linux/rbtree.h:148:
+                root->rb_leftmost = rb_next(node);$

WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line
torvalds#198: FILE: include/linux/rbtree.h:148:
+                root->rb_leftmost = rb_next(node);$

total: 4 errors, 3 warnings, 246 lines checked

NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
      mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.

NOTE: Whitespace errors detected.
      You may wish to use scripts/cleanpatch or scripts/cleanfile

./patches/rbtree-avoid-generating-code-twice-for-the-cached-versions.patch has style problems, please review.

NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
      them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.

Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches

Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
mrchapp pushed a commit to mrchapp/linux that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2019
…-fixes

WARNING: 'implemntation' may be misspelled - perhaps 'implementation'?
torvalds#8:
rb_leftmost was wired deeper into the implemntation, but there were some

ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
torvalds#180: FILE: include/linux/rbtree.h:130:
+#define RB_ROOT_CACHED (struct rb_root_cached) { {NULL, }, NULL }

ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
torvalds#183: FILE: include/linux/rbtree.h:133:
+#define rb_first_cached(root) (root)->rb_leftmost

ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
torvalds#197: FILE: include/linux/rbtree.h:147:
+        if (root->rb_leftmost == node)$

WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line
torvalds#197: FILE: include/linux/rbtree.h:147:
+        if (root->rb_leftmost == node)$

ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
torvalds#198: FILE: include/linux/rbtree.h:148:
+                root->rb_leftmost = rb_next(node);$

WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line
torvalds#198: FILE: include/linux/rbtree.h:148:
+                root->rb_leftmost = rb_next(node);$

total: 4 errors, 3 warnings, 246 lines checked

NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
      mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.

NOTE: Whitespace errors detected.
      You may wish to use scripts/cleanpatch or scripts/cleanfile

./patches/rbtree-avoid-generating-code-twice-for-the-cached-versions.patch has style problems, please review.

NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
      them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.

Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches

Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
samueldr pushed a commit to samueldr/linux that referenced this pull request Jun 28, 2020
commit d855086 upstream.

When the scheduler sets TIF_NEED_RESCHED & we call into the scheduler
from arch/mips/kernel/entry.S we disable interrupts. This is true
regardless of whether we reach work_resched from syscall_exit_work,
resume_userspace or by looping after calling schedule(). Although we
disable interrupts in these paths we don't call trace_hardirqs_off()
before calling into C code which may acquire locks, and we therefore
leave lockdep with an inconsistent view of whether interrupts are
disabled or not when CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING & CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP are
both enabled.

Without tracing this interrupt state lockdep will print warnings such
as the following once a task returns from a syscall via
syscall_exit_partial with TIF_NEED_RESCHED set:

[   49.927678] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[   49.934445] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3687 check_flags.part.41+0x1dc/0x1e8
[   49.946031] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(current->hardirqs_enabled)
[   49.946355] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted 4.10.0-00439-gc9fd5d362289-dirty torvalds#197
[   49.963505] Stack : 0000000000000000 ffffffff81bb5d6a 0000000000000006 ffffffff801ce9c4
[   49.974431]         0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 000000000000004a
[   49.985300]         ffffffff80b7e487 ffffffff80a24498 a8000000ff160000 ffffffff80ede8b8
[   49.996194]         0000000000000001 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000077c8030c
[   50.007063]         000000007fd8a510 ffffffff801cd45c 0000000000000000 a8000000ff127c88
[   50.017945]         0000000000000000 ffffffff801cf928 0000000000000001 ffffffff80a24498
[   50.028827]         0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
[   50.039688]         0000000000000000 a8000000ff127bd0 0000000000000000 ffffffff805509bc
[   50.050575]         00000000140084e0 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000040a00
[   50.061448]         0000000000000000 ffffffff8010e1b0 0000000000000000 ffffffff805509bc
[   50.072327]         ...
[   50.076087] Call Trace:
[   50.079869] [<ffffffff8010e1b0>] show_stack+0x80/0xa8
[   50.086577] [<ffffffff805509bc>] dump_stack+0x10c/0x190
[   50.093498] [<ffffffff8015dde0>] __warn+0xf0/0x108
[   50.099889] [<ffffffff8015de34>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x3c/0x48
[   50.107241] [<ffffffff801c15b4>] check_flags.part.41+0x1dc/0x1e8
[   50.114961] [<ffffffff801c239c>] lock_is_held_type+0x8c/0xb0
[   50.122291] [<ffffffff809461b8>] __schedule+0x8c0/0x10f8
[   50.129221] [<ffffffff80946a60>] schedule+0x30/0x98
[   50.135659] [<ffffffff80106278>] work_resched+0x8/0x34
[   50.142397] ---[ end trace 0cb4f6ef5b99fe21 ]---
[   50.148405] possible reason: unannotated irqs-off.
[   50.154600] irq event stamp: 400463
[   50.159566] hardirqs last  enabled at (400463): [<ffffffff8094edc8>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x40/0xa8
[   50.171981] hardirqs last disabled at (400462): [<ffffffff8094eb98>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x30/0xb0
[   50.183897] softirqs last  enabled at (400450): [<ffffffff8016580c>] __do_softirq+0x4ac/0x6a8
[   50.195015] softirqs last disabled at (400425): [<ffffffff80165e78>] irq_exit+0x110/0x128

Fix this by using the TRACE_IRQS_OFF macro to call trace_hardirqs_off()
when CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS is enabled. This is done before invoking
schedule() following the work_resched label because:

 1) Interrupts are disabled regardless of the path we take to reach
    work_resched() & schedule().

 2) Performing the tracing here avoids the need to do it in paths which
    disable interrupts but don't call out to C code before hitting a
    path which uses the RESTORE_SOME macro that will call
    trace_hardirqs_on() or trace_hardirqs_off() as appropriate.

We call trace_hardirqs_on() using the TRACE_IRQS_ON macro before calling
syscall_trace_leave() for similar reasons, ensuring that lockdep has a
consistent view of state after we re-enable interrupts.

Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com>
Fixes: 1da177e ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/15385/
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
fengguang pushed a commit to 0day-ci/linux that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2020
Once kobject_init_and_add() failed, pci_slot_release() is called to
delete slot->list from parent->slots. But slot->list is intialized
afterwards, so we ran into the following crash:

  Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
00000000
  ...
  CPU: 10 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.4.240 torvalds#197
  task: ffffeb398a45ef10 task.stack: ffffeb398a470000
  PC is at __list_del_entry_valid+0x5c/0xb0
  LR is at pci_slot_release+0x84/0xe4
  ...
  __list_del_entry_valid+0x5c/0xb0
  pci_slot_release+0x84/0xe4
  kobject_put+0x184/0x1c4
  pci_create_slot+0x17c/0x1b4
  __pci_hp_initialize+0x68/0xa4
  pciehp_probe+0x1a4/0x2fc
  pcie_port_probe_service+0x58/0x84
  driver_probe_device+0x320/0x470
  __driver_attach+0x54/0xb8
  bus_for_each_dev+0xc8/0xf0
  driver_attach+0x30/0x3c
  bus_add_driver+0x1b0/0x24c
  driver_register+0x9c/0xe0
  pcie_port_service_register+0x64/0x7c
  pcied_init+0x44/0xa4
  do_one_initcall+0x1d0/0x1f0
  kernel_init_freeable+0x24c/0x254
  kernel_init+0x18/0xe8
  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20

Fixes: 8a94644 ("PCI: Fix pci_create_slot() reference count leak")
Signed-off-by: Jubin Zhong <zhongjubin@huawei.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org #v4.4.235

----
v2:
  Since both slot memory and slot->list would be handled by
pci_slot_release(), we need to make sure slot->list is properly
initialized beforehand.

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1606288971-47927-1-git-send-email-zhongjubin@huawei.com/
  Two things need to be cleaned up on pci_create_slot's error path:
  1. free slot memory
  2. remove slot->list from its parent->slots
  This patch mistakenly took slot memory as unfreed (which is not), and
would introduce double free problem.
ruscur pushed a commit to ruscur/linux that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2020
If kobject_init_and_add() fails, pci_slot_release() is called to delete
slot->list from parent->slots.  But slot->list hasn't been initialized
yet, so we dereference a NULL pointer:

  Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
00000000
  ...
  CPU: 10 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.4.240 torvalds#197
  task: ffffeb398a45ef10 task.stack: ffffeb398a470000
  PC is at __list_del_entry_valid+0x5c/0xb0
  LR is at pci_slot_release+0x84/0xe4
  ...
  __list_del_entry_valid+0x5c/0xb0
  pci_slot_release+0x84/0xe4
  kobject_put+0x184/0x1c4
  pci_create_slot+0x17c/0x1b4
  __pci_hp_initialize+0x68/0xa4
  pciehp_probe+0x1a4/0x2fc
  pcie_port_probe_service+0x58/0x84
  driver_probe_device+0x320/0x470

Initialize slot->list before calling kobject_init_and_add() to avoid this.

Fixes: 8a94644 ("PCI: Fix pci_create_slot() reference count leak")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1606876422-117457-1-git-send-email-zhongjubin@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Jubin Zhong <zhongjubin@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org	# v5.9+
intersectRaven pushed a commit to intersectRaven/linux that referenced this pull request Dec 30, 2020
commit 4684709 upstream.

If kobject_init_and_add() fails, pci_slot_release() is called to delete
slot->list from parent->slots.  But slot->list hasn't been initialized
yet, so we dereference a NULL pointer:

  Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
00000000
  ...
  CPU: 10 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.4.240 torvalds#197
  task: ffffeb398a45ef10 task.stack: ffffeb398a470000
  PC is at __list_del_entry_valid+0x5c/0xb0
  LR is at pci_slot_release+0x84/0xe4
  ...
  __list_del_entry_valid+0x5c/0xb0
  pci_slot_release+0x84/0xe4
  kobject_put+0x184/0x1c4
  pci_create_slot+0x17c/0x1b4
  __pci_hp_initialize+0x68/0xa4
  pciehp_probe+0x1a4/0x2fc
  pcie_port_probe_service+0x58/0x84
  driver_probe_device+0x320/0x470

Initialize slot->list before calling kobject_init_and_add() to avoid this.

Fixes: 8a94644 ("PCI: Fix pci_create_slot() reference count leak")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1606876422-117457-1-git-send-email-zhongjubin@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Jubin Zhong <zhongjubin@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org	# v5.9+
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
mrchapp pushed a commit to mrchapp/linux that referenced this pull request Dec 30, 2020
commit 4684709 upstream.

If kobject_init_and_add() fails, pci_slot_release() is called to delete
slot->list from parent->slots.  But slot->list hasn't been initialized
yet, so we dereference a NULL pointer:

  Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
00000000
  ...
  CPU: 10 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.4.240 torvalds#197
  task: ffffeb398a45ef10 task.stack: ffffeb398a470000
  PC is at __list_del_entry_valid+0x5c/0xb0
  LR is at pci_slot_release+0x84/0xe4
  ...
  __list_del_entry_valid+0x5c/0xb0
  pci_slot_release+0x84/0xe4
  kobject_put+0x184/0x1c4
  pci_create_slot+0x17c/0x1b4
  __pci_hp_initialize+0x68/0xa4
  pciehp_probe+0x1a4/0x2fc
  pcie_port_probe_service+0x58/0x84
  driver_probe_device+0x320/0x470

Initialize slot->list before calling kobject_init_and_add() to avoid this.

Fixes: 8a94644 ("PCI: Fix pci_create_slot() reference count leak")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1606876422-117457-1-git-send-email-zhongjubin@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Jubin Zhong <zhongjubin@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org	# v5.9+
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
mrchapp pushed a commit to mrchapp/linux that referenced this pull request Dec 30, 2020
commit 4684709 upstream.

If kobject_init_and_add() fails, pci_slot_release() is called to delete
slot->list from parent->slots.  But slot->list hasn't been initialized
yet, so we dereference a NULL pointer:

  Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
00000000
  ...
  CPU: 10 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.4.240 torvalds#197
  task: ffffeb398a45ef10 task.stack: ffffeb398a470000
  PC is at __list_del_entry_valid+0x5c/0xb0
  LR is at pci_slot_release+0x84/0xe4
  ...
  __list_del_entry_valid+0x5c/0xb0
  pci_slot_release+0x84/0xe4
  kobject_put+0x184/0x1c4
  pci_create_slot+0x17c/0x1b4
  __pci_hp_initialize+0x68/0xa4
  pciehp_probe+0x1a4/0x2fc
  pcie_port_probe_service+0x58/0x84
  driver_probe_device+0x320/0x470

Initialize slot->list before calling kobject_init_and_add() to avoid this.

Fixes: 8a94644 ("PCI: Fix pci_create_slot() reference count leak")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1606876422-117457-1-git-send-email-zhongjubin@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Jubin Zhong <zhongjubin@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org	# v5.9+
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
mrchapp pushed a commit to mrchapp/linux that referenced this pull request Dec 30, 2020
commit 4684709 upstream.

If kobject_init_and_add() fails, pci_slot_release() is called to delete
slot->list from parent->slots.  But slot->list hasn't been initialized
yet, so we dereference a NULL pointer:

  Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
00000000
  ...
  CPU: 10 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.4.240 torvalds#197
  task: ffffeb398a45ef10 task.stack: ffffeb398a470000
  PC is at __list_del_entry_valid+0x5c/0xb0
  LR is at pci_slot_release+0x84/0xe4
  ...
  __list_del_entry_valid+0x5c/0xb0
  pci_slot_release+0x84/0xe4
  kobject_put+0x184/0x1c4
  pci_create_slot+0x17c/0x1b4
  __pci_hp_initialize+0x68/0xa4
  pciehp_probe+0x1a4/0x2fc
  pcie_port_probe_service+0x58/0x84
  driver_probe_device+0x320/0x470

Initialize slot->list before calling kobject_init_and_add() to avoid this.

Fixes: 8a94644 ("PCI: Fix pci_create_slot() reference count leak")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1606876422-117457-1-git-send-email-zhongjubin@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Jubin Zhong <zhongjubin@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org	# v5.9+
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
mrchapp pushed a commit to mrchapp/linux that referenced this pull request Dec 30, 2020
commit 4684709 upstream.

If kobject_init_and_add() fails, pci_slot_release() is called to delete
slot->list from parent->slots.  But slot->list hasn't been initialized
yet, so we dereference a NULL pointer:

  Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
00000000
  ...
  CPU: 10 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.4.240 torvalds#197
  task: ffffeb398a45ef10 task.stack: ffffeb398a470000
  PC is at __list_del_entry_valid+0x5c/0xb0
  LR is at pci_slot_release+0x84/0xe4
  ...
  __list_del_entry_valid+0x5c/0xb0
  pci_slot_release+0x84/0xe4
  kobject_put+0x184/0x1c4
  pci_create_slot+0x17c/0x1b4
  __pci_hp_initialize+0x68/0xa4
  pciehp_probe+0x1a4/0x2fc
  pcie_port_probe_service+0x58/0x84
  driver_probe_device+0x320/0x470

Initialize slot->list before calling kobject_init_and_add() to avoid this.

Fixes: 8a94644 ("PCI: Fix pci_create_slot() reference count leak")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1606876422-117457-1-git-send-email-zhongjubin@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Jubin Zhong <zhongjubin@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org	# v5.9+
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
mrchapp pushed a commit to mrchapp/linux that referenced this pull request Dec 30, 2020
commit 4684709 upstream.

If kobject_init_and_add() fails, pci_slot_release() is called to delete
slot->list from parent->slots.  But slot->list hasn't been initialized
yet, so we dereference a NULL pointer:

  Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
00000000
  ...
  CPU: 10 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.4.240 torvalds#197
  task: ffffeb398a45ef10 task.stack: ffffeb398a470000
  PC is at __list_del_entry_valid+0x5c/0xb0
  LR is at pci_slot_release+0x84/0xe4
  ...
  __list_del_entry_valid+0x5c/0xb0
  pci_slot_release+0x84/0xe4
  kobject_put+0x184/0x1c4
  pci_create_slot+0x17c/0x1b4
  __pci_hp_initialize+0x68/0xa4
  pciehp_probe+0x1a4/0x2fc
  pcie_port_probe_service+0x58/0x84
  driver_probe_device+0x320/0x470

Initialize slot->list before calling kobject_init_and_add() to avoid this.

Fixes: 8a94644 ("PCI: Fix pci_create_slot() reference count leak")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1606876422-117457-1-git-send-email-zhongjubin@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Jubin Zhong <zhongjubin@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org	# v5.9+
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
mrchapp pushed a commit to mrchapp/linux that referenced this pull request Dec 30, 2020
commit 4684709 upstream.

If kobject_init_and_add() fails, pci_slot_release() is called to delete
slot->list from parent->slots.  But slot->list hasn't been initialized
yet, so we dereference a NULL pointer:

  Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
00000000
  ...
  CPU: 10 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.4.240 torvalds#197
  task: ffffeb398a45ef10 task.stack: ffffeb398a470000
  PC is at __list_del_entry_valid+0x5c/0xb0
  LR is at pci_slot_release+0x84/0xe4
  ...
  __list_del_entry_valid+0x5c/0xb0
  pci_slot_release+0x84/0xe4
  kobject_put+0x184/0x1c4
  pci_create_slot+0x17c/0x1b4
  __pci_hp_initialize+0x68/0xa4
  pciehp_probe+0x1a4/0x2fc
  pcie_port_probe_service+0x58/0x84
  driver_probe_device+0x320/0x470

Initialize slot->list before calling kobject_init_and_add() to avoid this.

Fixes: 8a94644 ("PCI: Fix pci_create_slot() reference count leak")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1606876422-117457-1-git-send-email-zhongjubin@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Jubin Zhong <zhongjubin@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org	# v5.9+
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
mrchapp pushed a commit to mrchapp/linux that referenced this pull request Dec 30, 2020
commit 4684709 upstream.

If kobject_init_and_add() fails, pci_slot_release() is called to delete
slot->list from parent->slots.  But slot->list hasn't been initialized
yet, so we dereference a NULL pointer:

  Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
00000000
  ...
  CPU: 10 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.4.240 torvalds#197
  task: ffffeb398a45ef10 task.stack: ffffeb398a470000
  PC is at __list_del_entry_valid+0x5c/0xb0
  LR is at pci_slot_release+0x84/0xe4
  ...
  __list_del_entry_valid+0x5c/0xb0
  pci_slot_release+0x84/0xe4
  kobject_put+0x184/0x1c4
  pci_create_slot+0x17c/0x1b4
  __pci_hp_initialize+0x68/0xa4
  pciehp_probe+0x1a4/0x2fc
  pcie_port_probe_service+0x58/0x84
  driver_probe_device+0x320/0x470

Initialize slot->list before calling kobject_init_and_add() to avoid this.

Fixes: 8a94644 ("PCI: Fix pci_create_slot() reference count leak")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1606876422-117457-1-git-send-email-zhongjubin@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Jubin Zhong <zhongjubin@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org	# v5.9+
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
rkojedzinszky pushed a commit to rkojedzinszky/linux-kernel that referenced this pull request Dec 30, 2020
commit 4684709 upstream.

If kobject_init_and_add() fails, pci_slot_release() is called to delete
slot->list from parent->slots.  But slot->list hasn't been initialized
yet, so we dereference a NULL pointer:

  Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
00000000
  ...
  CPU: 10 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.4.240 torvalds#197
  task: ffffeb398a45ef10 task.stack: ffffeb398a470000
  PC is at __list_del_entry_valid+0x5c/0xb0
  LR is at pci_slot_release+0x84/0xe4
  ...
  __list_del_entry_valid+0x5c/0xb0
  pci_slot_release+0x84/0xe4
  kobject_put+0x184/0x1c4
  pci_create_slot+0x17c/0x1b4
  __pci_hp_initialize+0x68/0xa4
  pciehp_probe+0x1a4/0x2fc
  pcie_port_probe_service+0x58/0x84
  driver_probe_device+0x320/0x470

Initialize slot->list before calling kobject_init_and_add() to avoid this.

Fixes: 8a94644 ("PCI: Fix pci_create_slot() reference count leak")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1606876422-117457-1-git-send-email-zhongjubin@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Jubin Zhong <zhongjubin@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org	# v5.9+
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request May 2, 2022
[ Upstream commit b98535d ]

We got issue as follows:
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:389!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
CPU: 9 PID: 131 Comm: kworker/9:1 Not tainted 5.17.0-862.14.0.6.x86_64-00001-g23f87daf7d74-dirty torvalds#197
Workqueue: events flush_stashed_error_work
RIP: 0010:start_this_handle+0x41c/0x1160
RSP: 0018:ffff888106b47c20 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: ffffed10251b8400 RBX: ffff888128dc204c RCX: ffffffffb52972ac
RDX: 0000000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffff888128dc2050
RBP: 0000000000000039 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed10251b840a
R10: ffff888128dc204f R11: ffffed10251b8409 R12: ffff888116d78000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff888128dc2000
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88839d680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000001620068 CR3: 0000000376c0e000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 jbd2__journal_start+0x38a/0x790
 jbd2_journal_start+0x19/0x20
 flush_stashed_error_work+0x110/0x2b3
 process_one_work+0x688/0x1080
 worker_thread+0x8b/0xc50
 kthread+0x26f/0x310
 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
 </TASK>
Modules linked in:
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Above issue may happen as follows:
      umount            read procfs            error_work
ext4_put_super
  flush_work(&sbi->s_error_work);

                      ext4_mb_seq_groups_show
	                ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp
			  ext4_mb_init_group
			    ext4_mb_init_cache
	                      ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait
			        ext4_validate_block_bitmap
				  ext4_error
			            ext4_handle_error
			              schedule_work(&EXT4_SB(sb)->s_error_work);

  ext4_unregister_sysfs(sb);
  jbd2_journal_destroy(sbi->s_journal);
    journal_kill_thread
      journal->j_flags |= JBD2_UNMOUNT;

                                          flush_stashed_error_work
				            jbd2_journal_start
					      start_this_handle
					        BUG_ON(journal->j_flags & JBD2_UNMOUNT);

To solve this issue, we call 'ext4_unregister_sysfs() before flushing
s_error_work in ext4_put_super().

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220322012419.725457-1-yebin10@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request May 3, 2022
[ Upstream commit b98535d ]

We got issue as follows:
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:389!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
CPU: 9 PID: 131 Comm: kworker/9:1 Not tainted 5.17.0-862.14.0.6.x86_64-00001-g23f87daf7d74-dirty torvalds#197
Workqueue: events flush_stashed_error_work
RIP: 0010:start_this_handle+0x41c/0x1160
RSP: 0018:ffff888106b47c20 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: ffffed10251b8400 RBX: ffff888128dc204c RCX: ffffffffb52972ac
RDX: 0000000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffff888128dc2050
RBP: 0000000000000039 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed10251b840a
R10: ffff888128dc204f R11: ffffed10251b8409 R12: ffff888116d78000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff888128dc2000
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88839d680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000001620068 CR3: 0000000376c0e000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 jbd2__journal_start+0x38a/0x790
 jbd2_journal_start+0x19/0x20
 flush_stashed_error_work+0x110/0x2b3
 process_one_work+0x688/0x1080
 worker_thread+0x8b/0xc50
 kthread+0x26f/0x310
 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
 </TASK>
Modules linked in:
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Above issue may happen as follows:
      umount            read procfs            error_work
ext4_put_super
  flush_work(&sbi->s_error_work);

                      ext4_mb_seq_groups_show
	                ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp
			  ext4_mb_init_group
			    ext4_mb_init_cache
	                      ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait
			        ext4_validate_block_bitmap
				  ext4_error
			            ext4_handle_error
			              schedule_work(&EXT4_SB(sb)->s_error_work);

  ext4_unregister_sysfs(sb);
  jbd2_journal_destroy(sbi->s_journal);
    journal_kill_thread
      journal->j_flags |= JBD2_UNMOUNT;

                                          flush_stashed_error_work
				            jbd2_journal_start
					      start_this_handle
					        BUG_ON(journal->j_flags & JBD2_UNMOUNT);

To solve this issue, we call 'ext4_unregister_sysfs() before flushing
s_error_work in ext4_put_super().

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220322012419.725457-1-yebin10@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request May 3, 2022
[ Upstream commit b98535d ]

We got issue as follows:
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:389!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
CPU: 9 PID: 131 Comm: kworker/9:1 Not tainted 5.17.0-862.14.0.6.x86_64-00001-g23f87daf7d74-dirty torvalds#197
Workqueue: events flush_stashed_error_work
RIP: 0010:start_this_handle+0x41c/0x1160
RSP: 0018:ffff888106b47c20 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: ffffed10251b8400 RBX: ffff888128dc204c RCX: ffffffffb52972ac
RDX: 0000000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffff888128dc2050
RBP: 0000000000000039 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed10251b840a
R10: ffff888128dc204f R11: ffffed10251b8409 R12: ffff888116d78000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff888128dc2000
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88839d680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000001620068 CR3: 0000000376c0e000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 jbd2__journal_start+0x38a/0x790
 jbd2_journal_start+0x19/0x20
 flush_stashed_error_work+0x110/0x2b3
 process_one_work+0x688/0x1080
 worker_thread+0x8b/0xc50
 kthread+0x26f/0x310
 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
 </TASK>
Modules linked in:
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Above issue may happen as follows:
      umount            read procfs            error_work
ext4_put_super
  flush_work(&sbi->s_error_work);

                      ext4_mb_seq_groups_show
	                ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp
			  ext4_mb_init_group
			    ext4_mb_init_cache
	                      ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait
			        ext4_validate_block_bitmap
				  ext4_error
			            ext4_handle_error
			              schedule_work(&EXT4_SB(sb)->s_error_work);

  ext4_unregister_sysfs(sb);
  jbd2_journal_destroy(sbi->s_journal);
    journal_kill_thread
      journal->j_flags |= JBD2_UNMOUNT;

                                          flush_stashed_error_work
				            jbd2_journal_start
					      start_this_handle
					        BUG_ON(journal->j_flags & JBD2_UNMOUNT);

To solve this issue, we call 'ext4_unregister_sysfs() before flushing
s_error_work in ext4_put_super().

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220322012419.725457-1-yebin10@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request May 3, 2022
[ Upstream commit b98535d ]

We got issue as follows:
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:389!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
CPU: 9 PID: 131 Comm: kworker/9:1 Not tainted 5.17.0-862.14.0.6.x86_64-00001-g23f87daf7d74-dirty torvalds#197
Workqueue: events flush_stashed_error_work
RIP: 0010:start_this_handle+0x41c/0x1160
RSP: 0018:ffff888106b47c20 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: ffffed10251b8400 RBX: ffff888128dc204c RCX: ffffffffb52972ac
RDX: 0000000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffff888128dc2050
RBP: 0000000000000039 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed10251b840a
R10: ffff888128dc204f R11: ffffed10251b8409 R12: ffff888116d78000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff888128dc2000
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88839d680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000001620068 CR3: 0000000376c0e000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 jbd2__journal_start+0x38a/0x790
 jbd2_journal_start+0x19/0x20
 flush_stashed_error_work+0x110/0x2b3
 process_one_work+0x688/0x1080
 worker_thread+0x8b/0xc50
 kthread+0x26f/0x310
 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
 </TASK>
Modules linked in:
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Above issue may happen as follows:
      umount            read procfs            error_work
ext4_put_super
  flush_work(&sbi->s_error_work);

                      ext4_mb_seq_groups_show
	                ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp
			  ext4_mb_init_group
			    ext4_mb_init_cache
	                      ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait
			        ext4_validate_block_bitmap
				  ext4_error
			            ext4_handle_error
			              schedule_work(&EXT4_SB(sb)->s_error_work);

  ext4_unregister_sysfs(sb);
  jbd2_journal_destroy(sbi->s_journal);
    journal_kill_thread
      journal->j_flags |= JBD2_UNMOUNT;

                                          flush_stashed_error_work
				            jbd2_journal_start
					      start_this_handle
					        BUG_ON(journal->j_flags & JBD2_UNMOUNT);

To solve this issue, we call 'ext4_unregister_sysfs() before flushing
s_error_work in ext4_put_super().

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220322012419.725457-1-yebin10@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request May 3, 2022
[ Upstream commit b98535d ]

We got issue as follows:
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:389!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
CPU: 9 PID: 131 Comm: kworker/9:1 Not tainted 5.17.0-862.14.0.6.x86_64-00001-g23f87daf7d74-dirty torvalds#197
Workqueue: events flush_stashed_error_work
RIP: 0010:start_this_handle+0x41c/0x1160
RSP: 0018:ffff888106b47c20 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: ffffed10251b8400 RBX: ffff888128dc204c RCX: ffffffffb52972ac
RDX: 0000000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffff888128dc2050
RBP: 0000000000000039 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed10251b840a
R10: ffff888128dc204f R11: ffffed10251b8409 R12: ffff888116d78000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff888128dc2000
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88839d680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000001620068 CR3: 0000000376c0e000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 jbd2__journal_start+0x38a/0x790
 jbd2_journal_start+0x19/0x20
 flush_stashed_error_work+0x110/0x2b3
 process_one_work+0x688/0x1080
 worker_thread+0x8b/0xc50
 kthread+0x26f/0x310
 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
 </TASK>
Modules linked in:
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Above issue may happen as follows:
      umount            read procfs            error_work
ext4_put_super
  flush_work(&sbi->s_error_work);

                      ext4_mb_seq_groups_show
	                ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp
			  ext4_mb_init_group
			    ext4_mb_init_cache
	                      ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait
			        ext4_validate_block_bitmap
				  ext4_error
			            ext4_handle_error
			              schedule_work(&EXT4_SB(sb)->s_error_work);

  ext4_unregister_sysfs(sb);
  jbd2_journal_destroy(sbi->s_journal);
    journal_kill_thread
      journal->j_flags |= JBD2_UNMOUNT;

                                          flush_stashed_error_work
				            jbd2_journal_start
					      start_this_handle
					        BUG_ON(journal->j_flags & JBD2_UNMOUNT);

To solve this issue, we call 'ext4_unregister_sysfs() before flushing
s_error_work in ext4_put_super().

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220322012419.725457-1-yebin10@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request May 3, 2022
[ Upstream commit b98535d ]

We got issue as follows:
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:389!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
CPU: 9 PID: 131 Comm: kworker/9:1 Not tainted 5.17.0-862.14.0.6.x86_64-00001-g23f87daf7d74-dirty torvalds#197
Workqueue: events flush_stashed_error_work
RIP: 0010:start_this_handle+0x41c/0x1160
RSP: 0018:ffff888106b47c20 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: ffffed10251b8400 RBX: ffff888128dc204c RCX: ffffffffb52972ac
RDX: 0000000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffff888128dc2050
RBP: 0000000000000039 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed10251b840a
R10: ffff888128dc204f R11: ffffed10251b8409 R12: ffff888116d78000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff888128dc2000
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88839d680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000001620068 CR3: 0000000376c0e000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 jbd2__journal_start+0x38a/0x790
 jbd2_journal_start+0x19/0x20
 flush_stashed_error_work+0x110/0x2b3
 process_one_work+0x688/0x1080
 worker_thread+0x8b/0xc50
 kthread+0x26f/0x310
 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
 </TASK>
Modules linked in:
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Above issue may happen as follows:
      umount            read procfs            error_work
ext4_put_super
  flush_work(&sbi->s_error_work);

                      ext4_mb_seq_groups_show
	                ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp
			  ext4_mb_init_group
			    ext4_mb_init_cache
	                      ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait
			        ext4_validate_block_bitmap
				  ext4_error
			            ext4_handle_error
			              schedule_work(&EXT4_SB(sb)->s_error_work);

  ext4_unregister_sysfs(sb);
  jbd2_journal_destroy(sbi->s_journal);
    journal_kill_thread
      journal->j_flags |= JBD2_UNMOUNT;

                                          flush_stashed_error_work
				            jbd2_journal_start
					      start_this_handle
					        BUG_ON(journal->j_flags & JBD2_UNMOUNT);

To solve this issue, we call 'ext4_unregister_sysfs() before flushing
s_error_work in ext4_put_super().

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220322012419.725457-1-yebin10@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request May 3, 2022
[ Upstream commit b98535d ]

We got issue as follows:
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:389!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
CPU: 9 PID: 131 Comm: kworker/9:1 Not tainted 5.17.0-862.14.0.6.x86_64-00001-g23f87daf7d74-dirty torvalds#197
Workqueue: events flush_stashed_error_work
RIP: 0010:start_this_handle+0x41c/0x1160
RSP: 0018:ffff888106b47c20 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: ffffed10251b8400 RBX: ffff888128dc204c RCX: ffffffffb52972ac
RDX: 0000000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffff888128dc2050
RBP: 0000000000000039 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed10251b840a
R10: ffff888128dc204f R11: ffffed10251b8409 R12: ffff888116d78000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff888128dc2000
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88839d680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000001620068 CR3: 0000000376c0e000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 jbd2__journal_start+0x38a/0x790
 jbd2_journal_start+0x19/0x20
 flush_stashed_error_work+0x110/0x2b3
 process_one_work+0x688/0x1080
 worker_thread+0x8b/0xc50
 kthread+0x26f/0x310
 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
 </TASK>
Modules linked in:
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Above issue may happen as follows:
      umount            read procfs            error_work
ext4_put_super
  flush_work(&sbi->s_error_work);

                      ext4_mb_seq_groups_show
	                ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp
			  ext4_mb_init_group
			    ext4_mb_init_cache
	                      ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait
			        ext4_validate_block_bitmap
				  ext4_error
			            ext4_handle_error
			              schedule_work(&EXT4_SB(sb)->s_error_work);

  ext4_unregister_sysfs(sb);
  jbd2_journal_destroy(sbi->s_journal);
    journal_kill_thread
      journal->j_flags |= JBD2_UNMOUNT;

                                          flush_stashed_error_work
				            jbd2_journal_start
					      start_this_handle
					        BUG_ON(journal->j_flags & JBD2_UNMOUNT);

To solve this issue, we call 'ext4_unregister_sysfs() before flushing
s_error_work in ext4_put_super().

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220322012419.725457-1-yebin10@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request May 3, 2022
[ Upstream commit b98535d ]

We got issue as follows:
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:389!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
CPU: 9 PID: 131 Comm: kworker/9:1 Not tainted 5.17.0-862.14.0.6.x86_64-00001-g23f87daf7d74-dirty torvalds#197
Workqueue: events flush_stashed_error_work
RIP: 0010:start_this_handle+0x41c/0x1160
RSP: 0018:ffff888106b47c20 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: ffffed10251b8400 RBX: ffff888128dc204c RCX: ffffffffb52972ac
RDX: 0000000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffff888128dc2050
RBP: 0000000000000039 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed10251b840a
R10: ffff888128dc204f R11: ffffed10251b8409 R12: ffff888116d78000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff888128dc2000
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88839d680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000001620068 CR3: 0000000376c0e000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 jbd2__journal_start+0x38a/0x790
 jbd2_journal_start+0x19/0x20
 flush_stashed_error_work+0x110/0x2b3
 process_one_work+0x688/0x1080
 worker_thread+0x8b/0xc50
 kthread+0x26f/0x310
 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
 </TASK>
Modules linked in:
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Above issue may happen as follows:
      umount            read procfs            error_work
ext4_put_super
  flush_work(&sbi->s_error_work);

                      ext4_mb_seq_groups_show
	                ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp
			  ext4_mb_init_group
			    ext4_mb_init_cache
	                      ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait
			        ext4_validate_block_bitmap
				  ext4_error
			            ext4_handle_error
			              schedule_work(&EXT4_SB(sb)->s_error_work);

  ext4_unregister_sysfs(sb);
  jbd2_journal_destroy(sbi->s_journal);
    journal_kill_thread
      journal->j_flags |= JBD2_UNMOUNT;

                                          flush_stashed_error_work
				            jbd2_journal_start
					      start_this_handle
					        BUG_ON(journal->j_flags & JBD2_UNMOUNT);

To solve this issue, we call 'ext4_unregister_sysfs() before flushing
s_error_work in ext4_put_super().

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220322012419.725457-1-yebin10@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request May 3, 2022
[ Upstream commit b98535d ]

We got issue as follows:
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:389!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
CPU: 9 PID: 131 Comm: kworker/9:1 Not tainted 5.17.0-862.14.0.6.x86_64-00001-g23f87daf7d74-dirty torvalds#197
Workqueue: events flush_stashed_error_work
RIP: 0010:start_this_handle+0x41c/0x1160
RSP: 0018:ffff888106b47c20 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: ffffed10251b8400 RBX: ffff888128dc204c RCX: ffffffffb52972ac
RDX: 0000000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffff888128dc2050
RBP: 0000000000000039 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed10251b840a
R10: ffff888128dc204f R11: ffffed10251b8409 R12: ffff888116d78000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff888128dc2000
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88839d680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000001620068 CR3: 0000000376c0e000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 jbd2__journal_start+0x38a/0x790
 jbd2_journal_start+0x19/0x20
 flush_stashed_error_work+0x110/0x2b3
 process_one_work+0x688/0x1080
 worker_thread+0x8b/0xc50
 kthread+0x26f/0x310
 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
 </TASK>
Modules linked in:
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Above issue may happen as follows:
      umount            read procfs            error_work
ext4_put_super
  flush_work(&sbi->s_error_work);

                      ext4_mb_seq_groups_show
	                ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp
			  ext4_mb_init_group
			    ext4_mb_init_cache
	                      ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait
			        ext4_validate_block_bitmap
				  ext4_error
			            ext4_handle_error
			              schedule_work(&EXT4_SB(sb)->s_error_work);

  ext4_unregister_sysfs(sb);
  jbd2_journal_destroy(sbi->s_journal);
    journal_kill_thread
      journal->j_flags |= JBD2_UNMOUNT;

                                          flush_stashed_error_work
				            jbd2_journal_start
					      start_this_handle
					        BUG_ON(journal->j_flags & JBD2_UNMOUNT);

To solve this issue, we call 'ext4_unregister_sysfs() before flushing
s_error_work in ext4_put_super().

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220322012419.725457-1-yebin10@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request May 3, 2022
[ Upstream commit b98535d ]

We got issue as follows:
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:389!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
CPU: 9 PID: 131 Comm: kworker/9:1 Not tainted 5.17.0-862.14.0.6.x86_64-00001-g23f87daf7d74-dirty torvalds#197
Workqueue: events flush_stashed_error_work
RIP: 0010:start_this_handle+0x41c/0x1160
RSP: 0018:ffff888106b47c20 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: ffffed10251b8400 RBX: ffff888128dc204c RCX: ffffffffb52972ac
RDX: 0000000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffff888128dc2050
RBP: 0000000000000039 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed10251b840a
R10: ffff888128dc204f R11: ffffed10251b8409 R12: ffff888116d78000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff888128dc2000
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88839d680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000001620068 CR3: 0000000376c0e000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 jbd2__journal_start+0x38a/0x790
 jbd2_journal_start+0x19/0x20
 flush_stashed_error_work+0x110/0x2b3
 process_one_work+0x688/0x1080
 worker_thread+0x8b/0xc50
 kthread+0x26f/0x310
 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
 </TASK>
Modules linked in:
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Above issue may happen as follows:
      umount            read procfs            error_work
ext4_put_super
  flush_work(&sbi->s_error_work);

                      ext4_mb_seq_groups_show
	                ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp
			  ext4_mb_init_group
			    ext4_mb_init_cache
	                      ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait
			        ext4_validate_block_bitmap
				  ext4_error
			            ext4_handle_error
			              schedule_work(&EXT4_SB(sb)->s_error_work);

  ext4_unregister_sysfs(sb);
  jbd2_journal_destroy(sbi->s_journal);
    journal_kill_thread
      journal->j_flags |= JBD2_UNMOUNT;

                                          flush_stashed_error_work
				            jbd2_journal_start
					      start_this_handle
					        BUG_ON(journal->j_flags & JBD2_UNMOUNT);

To solve this issue, we call 'ext4_unregister_sysfs() before flushing
s_error_work in ext4_put_super().

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220322012419.725457-1-yebin10@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request May 3, 2022
[ Upstream commit b98535d ]

We got issue as follows:
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:389!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
CPU: 9 PID: 131 Comm: kworker/9:1 Not tainted 5.17.0-862.14.0.6.x86_64-00001-g23f87daf7d74-dirty torvalds#197
Workqueue: events flush_stashed_error_work
RIP: 0010:start_this_handle+0x41c/0x1160
RSP: 0018:ffff888106b47c20 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: ffffed10251b8400 RBX: ffff888128dc204c RCX: ffffffffb52972ac
RDX: 0000000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffff888128dc2050
RBP: 0000000000000039 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed10251b840a
R10: ffff888128dc204f R11: ffffed10251b8409 R12: ffff888116d78000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff888128dc2000
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88839d680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000001620068 CR3: 0000000376c0e000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 jbd2__journal_start+0x38a/0x790
 jbd2_journal_start+0x19/0x20
 flush_stashed_error_work+0x110/0x2b3
 process_one_work+0x688/0x1080
 worker_thread+0x8b/0xc50
 kthread+0x26f/0x310
 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
 </TASK>
Modules linked in:
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Above issue may happen as follows:
      umount            read procfs            error_work
ext4_put_super
  flush_work(&sbi->s_error_work);

                      ext4_mb_seq_groups_show
	                ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp
			  ext4_mb_init_group
			    ext4_mb_init_cache
	                      ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait
			        ext4_validate_block_bitmap
				  ext4_error
			            ext4_handle_error
			              schedule_work(&EXT4_SB(sb)->s_error_work);

  ext4_unregister_sysfs(sb);
  jbd2_journal_destroy(sbi->s_journal);
    journal_kill_thread
      journal->j_flags |= JBD2_UNMOUNT;

                                          flush_stashed_error_work
				            jbd2_journal_start
					      start_this_handle
					        BUG_ON(journal->j_flags & JBD2_UNMOUNT);

To solve this issue, we call 'ext4_unregister_sysfs() before flushing
s_error_work in ext4_put_super().

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220322012419.725457-1-yebin10@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request May 3, 2022
[ Upstream commit b98535d ]

We got issue as follows:
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:389!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
CPU: 9 PID: 131 Comm: kworker/9:1 Not tainted 5.17.0-862.14.0.6.x86_64-00001-g23f87daf7d74-dirty torvalds#197
Workqueue: events flush_stashed_error_work
RIP: 0010:start_this_handle+0x41c/0x1160
RSP: 0018:ffff888106b47c20 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: ffffed10251b8400 RBX: ffff888128dc204c RCX: ffffffffb52972ac
RDX: 0000000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffff888128dc2050
RBP: 0000000000000039 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed10251b840a
R10: ffff888128dc204f R11: ffffed10251b8409 R12: ffff888116d78000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff888128dc2000
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88839d680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000001620068 CR3: 0000000376c0e000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 jbd2__journal_start+0x38a/0x790
 jbd2_journal_start+0x19/0x20
 flush_stashed_error_work+0x110/0x2b3
 process_one_work+0x688/0x1080
 worker_thread+0x8b/0xc50
 kthread+0x26f/0x310
 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
 </TASK>
Modules linked in:
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Above issue may happen as follows:
      umount            read procfs            error_work
ext4_put_super
  flush_work(&sbi->s_error_work);

                      ext4_mb_seq_groups_show
	                ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp
			  ext4_mb_init_group
			    ext4_mb_init_cache
	                      ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait
			        ext4_validate_block_bitmap
				  ext4_error
			            ext4_handle_error
			              schedule_work(&EXT4_SB(sb)->s_error_work);

  ext4_unregister_sysfs(sb);
  jbd2_journal_destroy(sbi->s_journal);
    journal_kill_thread
      journal->j_flags |= JBD2_UNMOUNT;

                                          flush_stashed_error_work
				            jbd2_journal_start
					      start_this_handle
					        BUG_ON(journal->j_flags & JBD2_UNMOUNT);

To solve this issue, we call 'ext4_unregister_sysfs() before flushing
s_error_work in ext4_put_super().

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220322012419.725457-1-yebin10@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request May 3, 2022
[ Upstream commit b98535d ]

We got issue as follows:
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:389!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
CPU: 9 PID: 131 Comm: kworker/9:1 Not tainted 5.17.0-862.14.0.6.x86_64-00001-g23f87daf7d74-dirty torvalds#197
Workqueue: events flush_stashed_error_work
RIP: 0010:start_this_handle+0x41c/0x1160
RSP: 0018:ffff888106b47c20 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: ffffed10251b8400 RBX: ffff888128dc204c RCX: ffffffffb52972ac
RDX: 0000000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffff888128dc2050
RBP: 0000000000000039 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed10251b840a
R10: ffff888128dc204f R11: ffffed10251b8409 R12: ffff888116d78000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff888128dc2000
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88839d680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000001620068 CR3: 0000000376c0e000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 jbd2__journal_start+0x38a/0x790
 jbd2_journal_start+0x19/0x20
 flush_stashed_error_work+0x110/0x2b3
 process_one_work+0x688/0x1080
 worker_thread+0x8b/0xc50
 kthread+0x26f/0x310
 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
 </TASK>
Modules linked in:
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Above issue may happen as follows:
      umount            read procfs            error_work
ext4_put_super
  flush_work(&sbi->s_error_work);

                      ext4_mb_seq_groups_show
	                ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp
			  ext4_mb_init_group
			    ext4_mb_init_cache
	                      ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait
			        ext4_validate_block_bitmap
				  ext4_error
			            ext4_handle_error
			              schedule_work(&EXT4_SB(sb)->s_error_work);

  ext4_unregister_sysfs(sb);
  jbd2_journal_destroy(sbi->s_journal);
    journal_kill_thread
      journal->j_flags |= JBD2_UNMOUNT;

                                          flush_stashed_error_work
				            jbd2_journal_start
					      start_this_handle
					        BUG_ON(journal->j_flags & JBD2_UNMOUNT);

To solve this issue, we call 'ext4_unregister_sysfs() before flushing
s_error_work in ext4_put_super().

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220322012419.725457-1-yebin10@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request May 3, 2022
[ Upstream commit b98535d ]

We got issue as follows:
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:389!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
CPU: 9 PID: 131 Comm: kworker/9:1 Not tainted 5.17.0-862.14.0.6.x86_64-00001-g23f87daf7d74-dirty torvalds#197
Workqueue: events flush_stashed_error_work
RIP: 0010:start_this_handle+0x41c/0x1160
RSP: 0018:ffff888106b47c20 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: ffffed10251b8400 RBX: ffff888128dc204c RCX: ffffffffb52972ac
RDX: 0000000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffff888128dc2050
RBP: 0000000000000039 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed10251b840a
R10: ffff888128dc204f R11: ffffed10251b8409 R12: ffff888116d78000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff888128dc2000
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88839d680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000001620068 CR3: 0000000376c0e000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 jbd2__journal_start+0x38a/0x790
 jbd2_journal_start+0x19/0x20
 flush_stashed_error_work+0x110/0x2b3
 process_one_work+0x688/0x1080
 worker_thread+0x8b/0xc50
 kthread+0x26f/0x310
 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
 </TASK>
Modules linked in:
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Above issue may happen as follows:
      umount            read procfs            error_work
ext4_put_super
  flush_work(&sbi->s_error_work);

                      ext4_mb_seq_groups_show
	                ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp
			  ext4_mb_init_group
			    ext4_mb_init_cache
	                      ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait
			        ext4_validate_block_bitmap
				  ext4_error
			            ext4_handle_error
			              schedule_work(&EXT4_SB(sb)->s_error_work);

  ext4_unregister_sysfs(sb);
  jbd2_journal_destroy(sbi->s_journal);
    journal_kill_thread
      journal->j_flags |= JBD2_UNMOUNT;

                                          flush_stashed_error_work
				            jbd2_journal_start
					      start_this_handle
					        BUG_ON(journal->j_flags & JBD2_UNMOUNT);

To solve this issue, we call 'ext4_unregister_sysfs() before flushing
s_error_work in ext4_put_super().

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220322012419.725457-1-yebin10@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request May 4, 2022
[ Upstream commit b98535d ]

We got issue as follows:
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:389!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
CPU: 9 PID: 131 Comm: kworker/9:1 Not tainted 5.17.0-862.14.0.6.x86_64-00001-g23f87daf7d74-dirty torvalds#197
Workqueue: events flush_stashed_error_work
RIP: 0010:start_this_handle+0x41c/0x1160
RSP: 0018:ffff888106b47c20 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: ffffed10251b8400 RBX: ffff888128dc204c RCX: ffffffffb52972ac
RDX: 0000000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffff888128dc2050
RBP: 0000000000000039 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed10251b840a
R10: ffff888128dc204f R11: ffffed10251b8409 R12: ffff888116d78000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff888128dc2000
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88839d680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000001620068 CR3: 0000000376c0e000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 jbd2__journal_start+0x38a/0x790
 jbd2_journal_start+0x19/0x20
 flush_stashed_error_work+0x110/0x2b3
 process_one_work+0x688/0x1080
 worker_thread+0x8b/0xc50
 kthread+0x26f/0x310
 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
 </TASK>
Modules linked in:
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Above issue may happen as follows:
      umount            read procfs            error_work
ext4_put_super
  flush_work(&sbi->s_error_work);

                      ext4_mb_seq_groups_show
	                ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp
			  ext4_mb_init_group
			    ext4_mb_init_cache
	                      ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait
			        ext4_validate_block_bitmap
				  ext4_error
			            ext4_handle_error
			              schedule_work(&EXT4_SB(sb)->s_error_work);

  ext4_unregister_sysfs(sb);
  jbd2_journal_destroy(sbi->s_journal);
    journal_kill_thread
      journal->j_flags |= JBD2_UNMOUNT;

                                          flush_stashed_error_work
				            jbd2_journal_start
					      start_this_handle
					        BUG_ON(journal->j_flags & JBD2_UNMOUNT);

To solve this issue, we call 'ext4_unregister_sysfs() before flushing
s_error_work in ext4_put_super().

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220322012419.725457-1-yebin10@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request May 4, 2022
[ Upstream commit b98535d ]

We got issue as follows:
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:389!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
CPU: 9 PID: 131 Comm: kworker/9:1 Not tainted 5.17.0-862.14.0.6.x86_64-00001-g23f87daf7d74-dirty torvalds#197
Workqueue: events flush_stashed_error_work
RIP: 0010:start_this_handle+0x41c/0x1160
RSP: 0018:ffff888106b47c20 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: ffffed10251b8400 RBX: ffff888128dc204c RCX: ffffffffb52972ac
RDX: 0000000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffff888128dc2050
RBP: 0000000000000039 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed10251b840a
R10: ffff888128dc204f R11: ffffed10251b8409 R12: ffff888116d78000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff888128dc2000
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88839d680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000001620068 CR3: 0000000376c0e000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 jbd2__journal_start+0x38a/0x790
 jbd2_journal_start+0x19/0x20
 flush_stashed_error_work+0x110/0x2b3
 process_one_work+0x688/0x1080
 worker_thread+0x8b/0xc50
 kthread+0x26f/0x310
 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
 </TASK>
Modules linked in:
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Above issue may happen as follows:
      umount            read procfs            error_work
ext4_put_super
  flush_work(&sbi->s_error_work);

                      ext4_mb_seq_groups_show
	                ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp
			  ext4_mb_init_group
			    ext4_mb_init_cache
	                      ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait
			        ext4_validate_block_bitmap
				  ext4_error
			            ext4_handle_error
			              schedule_work(&EXT4_SB(sb)->s_error_work);

  ext4_unregister_sysfs(sb);
  jbd2_journal_destroy(sbi->s_journal);
    journal_kill_thread
      journal->j_flags |= JBD2_UNMOUNT;

                                          flush_stashed_error_work
				            jbd2_journal_start
					      start_this_handle
					        BUG_ON(journal->j_flags & JBD2_UNMOUNT);

To solve this issue, we call 'ext4_unregister_sysfs() before flushing
s_error_work in ext4_put_super().

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220322012419.725457-1-yebin10@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request May 4, 2022
[ Upstream commit b98535d ]

We got issue as follows:
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:389!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
CPU: 9 PID: 131 Comm: kworker/9:1 Not tainted 5.17.0-862.14.0.6.x86_64-00001-g23f87daf7d74-dirty torvalds#197
Workqueue: events flush_stashed_error_work
RIP: 0010:start_this_handle+0x41c/0x1160
RSP: 0018:ffff888106b47c20 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: ffffed10251b8400 RBX: ffff888128dc204c RCX: ffffffffb52972ac
RDX: 0000000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffff888128dc2050
RBP: 0000000000000039 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed10251b840a
R10: ffff888128dc204f R11: ffffed10251b8409 R12: ffff888116d78000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff888128dc2000
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88839d680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000001620068 CR3: 0000000376c0e000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 jbd2__journal_start+0x38a/0x790
 jbd2_journal_start+0x19/0x20
 flush_stashed_error_work+0x110/0x2b3
 process_one_work+0x688/0x1080
 worker_thread+0x8b/0xc50
 kthread+0x26f/0x310
 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
 </TASK>
Modules linked in:
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Above issue may happen as follows:
      umount            read procfs            error_work
ext4_put_super
  flush_work(&sbi->s_error_work);

                      ext4_mb_seq_groups_show
	                ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp
			  ext4_mb_init_group
			    ext4_mb_init_cache
	                      ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait
			        ext4_validate_block_bitmap
				  ext4_error
			            ext4_handle_error
			              schedule_work(&EXT4_SB(sb)->s_error_work);

  ext4_unregister_sysfs(sb);
  jbd2_journal_destroy(sbi->s_journal);
    journal_kill_thread
      journal->j_flags |= JBD2_UNMOUNT;

                                          flush_stashed_error_work
				            jbd2_journal_start
					      start_this_handle
					        BUG_ON(journal->j_flags & JBD2_UNMOUNT);

To solve this issue, we call 'ext4_unregister_sysfs() before flushing
s_error_work in ext4_put_super().

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220322012419.725457-1-yebin10@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request May 4, 2022
[ Upstream commit b98535d ]

We got issue as follows:
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:389!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
CPU: 9 PID: 131 Comm: kworker/9:1 Not tainted 5.17.0-862.14.0.6.x86_64-00001-g23f87daf7d74-dirty torvalds#197
Workqueue: events flush_stashed_error_work
RIP: 0010:start_this_handle+0x41c/0x1160
RSP: 0018:ffff888106b47c20 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: ffffed10251b8400 RBX: ffff888128dc204c RCX: ffffffffb52972ac
RDX: 0000000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffff888128dc2050
RBP: 0000000000000039 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed10251b840a
R10: ffff888128dc204f R11: ffffed10251b8409 R12: ffff888116d78000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff888128dc2000
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88839d680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000001620068 CR3: 0000000376c0e000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 jbd2__journal_start+0x38a/0x790
 jbd2_journal_start+0x19/0x20
 flush_stashed_error_work+0x110/0x2b3
 process_one_work+0x688/0x1080
 worker_thread+0x8b/0xc50
 kthread+0x26f/0x310
 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
 </TASK>
Modules linked in:
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Above issue may happen as follows:
      umount            read procfs            error_work
ext4_put_super
  flush_work(&sbi->s_error_work);

                      ext4_mb_seq_groups_show
	                ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp
			  ext4_mb_init_group
			    ext4_mb_init_cache
	                      ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait
			        ext4_validate_block_bitmap
				  ext4_error
			            ext4_handle_error
			              schedule_work(&EXT4_SB(sb)->s_error_work);

  ext4_unregister_sysfs(sb);
  jbd2_journal_destroy(sbi->s_journal);
    journal_kill_thread
      journal->j_flags |= JBD2_UNMOUNT;

                                          flush_stashed_error_work
				            jbd2_journal_start
					      start_this_handle
					        BUG_ON(journal->j_flags & JBD2_UNMOUNT);

To solve this issue, we call 'ext4_unregister_sysfs() before flushing
s_error_work in ext4_put_super().

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220322012419.725457-1-yebin10@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request May 4, 2022
[ Upstream commit b98535d ]

We got issue as follows:
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:389!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
CPU: 9 PID: 131 Comm: kworker/9:1 Not tainted 5.17.0-862.14.0.6.x86_64-00001-g23f87daf7d74-dirty torvalds#197
Workqueue: events flush_stashed_error_work
RIP: 0010:start_this_handle+0x41c/0x1160
RSP: 0018:ffff888106b47c20 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: ffffed10251b8400 RBX: ffff888128dc204c RCX: ffffffffb52972ac
RDX: 0000000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffff888128dc2050
RBP: 0000000000000039 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed10251b840a
R10: ffff888128dc204f R11: ffffed10251b8409 R12: ffff888116d78000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff888128dc2000
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88839d680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000001620068 CR3: 0000000376c0e000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 jbd2__journal_start+0x38a/0x790
 jbd2_journal_start+0x19/0x20
 flush_stashed_error_work+0x110/0x2b3
 process_one_work+0x688/0x1080
 worker_thread+0x8b/0xc50
 kthread+0x26f/0x310
 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
 </TASK>
Modules linked in:
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Above issue may happen as follows:
      umount            read procfs            error_work
ext4_put_super
  flush_work(&sbi->s_error_work);

                      ext4_mb_seq_groups_show
	                ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp
			  ext4_mb_init_group
			    ext4_mb_init_cache
	                      ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait
			        ext4_validate_block_bitmap
				  ext4_error
			            ext4_handle_error
			              schedule_work(&EXT4_SB(sb)->s_error_work);

  ext4_unregister_sysfs(sb);
  jbd2_journal_destroy(sbi->s_journal);
    journal_kill_thread
      journal->j_flags |= JBD2_UNMOUNT;

                                          flush_stashed_error_work
				            jbd2_journal_start
					      start_this_handle
					        BUG_ON(journal->j_flags & JBD2_UNMOUNT);

To solve this issue, we call 'ext4_unregister_sysfs() before flushing
s_error_work in ext4_put_super().

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220322012419.725457-1-yebin10@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request May 4, 2022
[ Upstream commit b98535d ]

We got issue as follows:
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:389!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
CPU: 9 PID: 131 Comm: kworker/9:1 Not tainted 5.17.0-862.14.0.6.x86_64-00001-g23f87daf7d74-dirty torvalds#197
Workqueue: events flush_stashed_error_work
RIP: 0010:start_this_handle+0x41c/0x1160
RSP: 0018:ffff888106b47c20 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: ffffed10251b8400 RBX: ffff888128dc204c RCX: ffffffffb52972ac
RDX: 0000000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffff888128dc2050
RBP: 0000000000000039 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed10251b840a
R10: ffff888128dc204f R11: ffffed10251b8409 R12: ffff888116d78000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff888128dc2000
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88839d680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000001620068 CR3: 0000000376c0e000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 jbd2__journal_start+0x38a/0x790
 jbd2_journal_start+0x19/0x20
 flush_stashed_error_work+0x110/0x2b3
 process_one_work+0x688/0x1080
 worker_thread+0x8b/0xc50
 kthread+0x26f/0x310
 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
 </TASK>
Modules linked in:
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Above issue may happen as follows:
      umount            read procfs            error_work
ext4_put_super
  flush_work(&sbi->s_error_work);

                      ext4_mb_seq_groups_show
	                ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp
			  ext4_mb_init_group
			    ext4_mb_init_cache
	                      ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait
			        ext4_validate_block_bitmap
				  ext4_error
			            ext4_handle_error
			              schedule_work(&EXT4_SB(sb)->s_error_work);

  ext4_unregister_sysfs(sb);
  jbd2_journal_destroy(sbi->s_journal);
    journal_kill_thread
      journal->j_flags |= JBD2_UNMOUNT;

                                          flush_stashed_error_work
				            jbd2_journal_start
					      start_this_handle
					        BUG_ON(journal->j_flags & JBD2_UNMOUNT);

To solve this issue, we call 'ext4_unregister_sysfs() before flushing
s_error_work in ext4_put_super().

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220322012419.725457-1-yebin10@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request May 8, 2022
[ Upstream commit b98535d ]

We got issue as follows:
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:389!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
CPU: 9 PID: 131 Comm: kworker/9:1 Not tainted 5.17.0-862.14.0.6.x86_64-00001-g23f87daf7d74-dirty torvalds#197
Workqueue: events flush_stashed_error_work
RIP: 0010:start_this_handle+0x41c/0x1160
RSP: 0018:ffff888106b47c20 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: ffffed10251b8400 RBX: ffff888128dc204c RCX: ffffffffb52972ac
RDX: 0000000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffff888128dc2050
RBP: 0000000000000039 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed10251b840a
R10: ffff888128dc204f R11: ffffed10251b8409 R12: ffff888116d78000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff888128dc2000
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88839d680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000001620068 CR3: 0000000376c0e000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 jbd2__journal_start+0x38a/0x790
 jbd2_journal_start+0x19/0x20
 flush_stashed_error_work+0x110/0x2b3
 process_one_work+0x688/0x1080
 worker_thread+0x8b/0xc50
 kthread+0x26f/0x310
 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
 </TASK>
Modules linked in:
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Above issue may happen as follows:
      umount            read procfs            error_work
ext4_put_super
  flush_work(&sbi->s_error_work);

                      ext4_mb_seq_groups_show
	                ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp
			  ext4_mb_init_group
			    ext4_mb_init_cache
	                      ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait
			        ext4_validate_block_bitmap
				  ext4_error
			            ext4_handle_error
			              schedule_work(&EXT4_SB(sb)->s_error_work);

  ext4_unregister_sysfs(sb);
  jbd2_journal_destroy(sbi->s_journal);
    journal_kill_thread
      journal->j_flags |= JBD2_UNMOUNT;

                                          flush_stashed_error_work
				            jbd2_journal_start
					      start_this_handle
					        BUG_ON(journal->j_flags & JBD2_UNMOUNT);

To solve this issue, we call 'ext4_unregister_sysfs() before flushing
s_error_work in ext4_put_super().

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220322012419.725457-1-yebin10@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request May 8, 2022
[ Upstream commit b98535d ]

We got issue as follows:
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:389!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
CPU: 9 PID: 131 Comm: kworker/9:1 Not tainted 5.17.0-862.14.0.6.x86_64-00001-g23f87daf7d74-dirty torvalds#197
Workqueue: events flush_stashed_error_work
RIP: 0010:start_this_handle+0x41c/0x1160
RSP: 0018:ffff888106b47c20 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: ffffed10251b8400 RBX: ffff888128dc204c RCX: ffffffffb52972ac
RDX: 0000000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffff888128dc2050
RBP: 0000000000000039 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed10251b840a
R10: ffff888128dc204f R11: ffffed10251b8409 R12: ffff888116d78000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff888128dc2000
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88839d680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000001620068 CR3: 0000000376c0e000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 jbd2__journal_start+0x38a/0x790
 jbd2_journal_start+0x19/0x20
 flush_stashed_error_work+0x110/0x2b3
 process_one_work+0x688/0x1080
 worker_thread+0x8b/0xc50
 kthread+0x26f/0x310
 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
 </TASK>
Modules linked in:
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Above issue may happen as follows:
      umount            read procfs            error_work
ext4_put_super
  flush_work(&sbi->s_error_work);

                      ext4_mb_seq_groups_show
	                ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp
			  ext4_mb_init_group
			    ext4_mb_init_cache
	                      ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait
			        ext4_validate_block_bitmap
				  ext4_error
			            ext4_handle_error
			              schedule_work(&EXT4_SB(sb)->s_error_work);

  ext4_unregister_sysfs(sb);
  jbd2_journal_destroy(sbi->s_journal);
    journal_kill_thread
      journal->j_flags |= JBD2_UNMOUNT;

                                          flush_stashed_error_work
				            jbd2_journal_start
					      start_this_handle
					        BUG_ON(journal->j_flags & JBD2_UNMOUNT);

To solve this issue, we call 'ext4_unregister_sysfs() before flushing
s_error_work in ext4_put_super().

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220322012419.725457-1-yebin10@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request May 8, 2022
[ Upstream commit b98535d ]

We got issue as follows:
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:389!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
CPU: 9 PID: 131 Comm: kworker/9:1 Not tainted 5.17.0-862.14.0.6.x86_64-00001-g23f87daf7d74-dirty torvalds#197
Workqueue: events flush_stashed_error_work
RIP: 0010:start_this_handle+0x41c/0x1160
RSP: 0018:ffff888106b47c20 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: ffffed10251b8400 RBX: ffff888128dc204c RCX: ffffffffb52972ac
RDX: 0000000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffff888128dc2050
RBP: 0000000000000039 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed10251b840a
R10: ffff888128dc204f R11: ffffed10251b8409 R12: ffff888116d78000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff888128dc2000
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88839d680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000001620068 CR3: 0000000376c0e000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 jbd2__journal_start+0x38a/0x790
 jbd2_journal_start+0x19/0x20
 flush_stashed_error_work+0x110/0x2b3
 process_one_work+0x688/0x1080
 worker_thread+0x8b/0xc50
 kthread+0x26f/0x310
 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
 </TASK>
Modules linked in:
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Above issue may happen as follows:
      umount            read procfs            error_work
ext4_put_super
  flush_work(&sbi->s_error_work);

                      ext4_mb_seq_groups_show
	                ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp
			  ext4_mb_init_group
			    ext4_mb_init_cache
	                      ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait
			        ext4_validate_block_bitmap
				  ext4_error
			            ext4_handle_error
			              schedule_work(&EXT4_SB(sb)->s_error_work);

  ext4_unregister_sysfs(sb);
  jbd2_journal_destroy(sbi->s_journal);
    journal_kill_thread
      journal->j_flags |= JBD2_UNMOUNT;

                                          flush_stashed_error_work
				            jbd2_journal_start
					      start_this_handle
					        BUG_ON(journal->j_flags & JBD2_UNMOUNT);

To solve this issue, we call 'ext4_unregister_sysfs() before flushing
s_error_work in ext4_put_super().

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220322012419.725457-1-yebin10@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request May 9, 2022
[ Upstream commit b98535d ]

We got issue as follows:
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:389!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
CPU: 9 PID: 131 Comm: kworker/9:1 Not tainted 5.17.0-862.14.0.6.x86_64-00001-g23f87daf7d74-dirty torvalds#197
Workqueue: events flush_stashed_error_work
RIP: 0010:start_this_handle+0x41c/0x1160
RSP: 0018:ffff888106b47c20 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: ffffed10251b8400 RBX: ffff888128dc204c RCX: ffffffffb52972ac
RDX: 0000000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffff888128dc2050
RBP: 0000000000000039 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed10251b840a
R10: ffff888128dc204f R11: ffffed10251b8409 R12: ffff888116d78000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff888128dc2000
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88839d680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000001620068 CR3: 0000000376c0e000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 jbd2__journal_start+0x38a/0x790
 jbd2_journal_start+0x19/0x20
 flush_stashed_error_work+0x110/0x2b3
 process_one_work+0x688/0x1080
 worker_thread+0x8b/0xc50
 kthread+0x26f/0x310
 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
 </TASK>
Modules linked in:
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Above issue may happen as follows:
      umount            read procfs            error_work
ext4_put_super
  flush_work(&sbi->s_error_work);

                      ext4_mb_seq_groups_show
	                ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp
			  ext4_mb_init_group
			    ext4_mb_init_cache
	                      ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait
			        ext4_validate_block_bitmap
				  ext4_error
			            ext4_handle_error
			              schedule_work(&EXT4_SB(sb)->s_error_work);

  ext4_unregister_sysfs(sb);
  jbd2_journal_destroy(sbi->s_journal);
    journal_kill_thread
      journal->j_flags |= JBD2_UNMOUNT;

                                          flush_stashed_error_work
				            jbd2_journal_start
					      start_this_handle
					        BUG_ON(journal->j_flags & JBD2_UNMOUNT);

To solve this issue, we call 'ext4_unregister_sysfs() before flushing
s_error_work in ext4_put_super().

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220322012419.725457-1-yebin10@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request May 9, 2022
[ Upstream commit b98535d ]

We got issue as follows:
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:389!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
CPU: 9 PID: 131 Comm: kworker/9:1 Not tainted 5.17.0-862.14.0.6.x86_64-00001-g23f87daf7d74-dirty torvalds#197
Workqueue: events flush_stashed_error_work
RIP: 0010:start_this_handle+0x41c/0x1160
RSP: 0018:ffff888106b47c20 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: ffffed10251b8400 RBX: ffff888128dc204c RCX: ffffffffb52972ac
RDX: 0000000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffff888128dc2050
RBP: 0000000000000039 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed10251b840a
R10: ffff888128dc204f R11: ffffed10251b8409 R12: ffff888116d78000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff888128dc2000
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88839d680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000001620068 CR3: 0000000376c0e000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 jbd2__journal_start+0x38a/0x790
 jbd2_journal_start+0x19/0x20
 flush_stashed_error_work+0x110/0x2b3
 process_one_work+0x688/0x1080
 worker_thread+0x8b/0xc50
 kthread+0x26f/0x310
 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
 </TASK>
Modules linked in:
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Above issue may happen as follows:
      umount            read procfs            error_work
ext4_put_super
  flush_work(&sbi->s_error_work);

                      ext4_mb_seq_groups_show
	                ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp
			  ext4_mb_init_group
			    ext4_mb_init_cache
	                      ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait
			        ext4_validate_block_bitmap
				  ext4_error
			            ext4_handle_error
			              schedule_work(&EXT4_SB(sb)->s_error_work);

  ext4_unregister_sysfs(sb);
  jbd2_journal_destroy(sbi->s_journal);
    journal_kill_thread
      journal->j_flags |= JBD2_UNMOUNT;

                                          flush_stashed_error_work
				            jbd2_journal_start
					      start_this_handle
					        BUG_ON(journal->j_flags & JBD2_UNMOUNT);

To solve this issue, we call 'ext4_unregister_sysfs() before flushing
s_error_work in ext4_put_super().

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220322012419.725457-1-yebin10@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request May 9, 2022
[ Upstream commit b98535d ]

We got issue as follows:
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:389!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
CPU: 9 PID: 131 Comm: kworker/9:1 Not tainted 5.17.0-862.14.0.6.x86_64-00001-g23f87daf7d74-dirty torvalds#197
Workqueue: events flush_stashed_error_work
RIP: 0010:start_this_handle+0x41c/0x1160
RSP: 0018:ffff888106b47c20 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: ffffed10251b8400 RBX: ffff888128dc204c RCX: ffffffffb52972ac
RDX: 0000000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffff888128dc2050
RBP: 0000000000000039 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed10251b840a
R10: ffff888128dc204f R11: ffffed10251b8409 R12: ffff888116d78000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff888128dc2000
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88839d680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000001620068 CR3: 0000000376c0e000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 jbd2__journal_start+0x38a/0x790
 jbd2_journal_start+0x19/0x20
 flush_stashed_error_work+0x110/0x2b3
 process_one_work+0x688/0x1080
 worker_thread+0x8b/0xc50
 kthread+0x26f/0x310
 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
 </TASK>
Modules linked in:
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Above issue may happen as follows:
      umount            read procfs            error_work
ext4_put_super
  flush_work(&sbi->s_error_work);

                      ext4_mb_seq_groups_show
	                ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp
			  ext4_mb_init_group
			    ext4_mb_init_cache
	                      ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait
			        ext4_validate_block_bitmap
				  ext4_error
			            ext4_handle_error
			              schedule_work(&EXT4_SB(sb)->s_error_work);

  ext4_unregister_sysfs(sb);
  jbd2_journal_destroy(sbi->s_journal);
    journal_kill_thread
      journal->j_flags |= JBD2_UNMOUNT;

                                          flush_stashed_error_work
				            jbd2_journal_start
					      start_this_handle
					        BUG_ON(journal->j_flags & JBD2_UNMOUNT);

To solve this issue, we call 'ext4_unregister_sysfs() before flushing
s_error_work in ext4_put_super().

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220322012419.725457-1-yebin10@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request May 9, 2022
[ Upstream commit b98535d ]

We got issue as follows:
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:389!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
CPU: 9 PID: 131 Comm: kworker/9:1 Not tainted 5.17.0-862.14.0.6.x86_64-00001-g23f87daf7d74-dirty torvalds#197
Workqueue: events flush_stashed_error_work
RIP: 0010:start_this_handle+0x41c/0x1160
RSP: 0018:ffff888106b47c20 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: ffffed10251b8400 RBX: ffff888128dc204c RCX: ffffffffb52972ac
RDX: 0000000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffff888128dc2050
RBP: 0000000000000039 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed10251b840a
R10: ffff888128dc204f R11: ffffed10251b8409 R12: ffff888116d78000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff888128dc2000
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88839d680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000001620068 CR3: 0000000376c0e000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 jbd2__journal_start+0x38a/0x790
 jbd2_journal_start+0x19/0x20
 flush_stashed_error_work+0x110/0x2b3
 process_one_work+0x688/0x1080
 worker_thread+0x8b/0xc50
 kthread+0x26f/0x310
 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
 </TASK>
Modules linked in:
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Above issue may happen as follows:
      umount            read procfs            error_work
ext4_put_super
  flush_work(&sbi->s_error_work);

                      ext4_mb_seq_groups_show
	                ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp
			  ext4_mb_init_group
			    ext4_mb_init_cache
	                      ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait
			        ext4_validate_block_bitmap
				  ext4_error
			            ext4_handle_error
			              schedule_work(&EXT4_SB(sb)->s_error_work);

  ext4_unregister_sysfs(sb);
  jbd2_journal_destroy(sbi->s_journal);
    journal_kill_thread
      journal->j_flags |= JBD2_UNMOUNT;

                                          flush_stashed_error_work
				            jbd2_journal_start
					      start_this_handle
					        BUG_ON(journal->j_flags & JBD2_UNMOUNT);

To solve this issue, we call 'ext4_unregister_sysfs() before flushing
s_error_work in ext4_put_super().

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220322012419.725457-1-yebin10@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request May 9, 2022
[ Upstream commit b98535d ]

We got issue as follows:
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:389!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
CPU: 9 PID: 131 Comm: kworker/9:1 Not tainted 5.17.0-862.14.0.6.x86_64-00001-g23f87daf7d74-dirty torvalds#197
Workqueue: events flush_stashed_error_work
RIP: 0010:start_this_handle+0x41c/0x1160
RSP: 0018:ffff888106b47c20 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: ffffed10251b8400 RBX: ffff888128dc204c RCX: ffffffffb52972ac
RDX: 0000000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffff888128dc2050
RBP: 0000000000000039 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed10251b840a
R10: ffff888128dc204f R11: ffffed10251b8409 R12: ffff888116d78000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff888128dc2000
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88839d680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000001620068 CR3: 0000000376c0e000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 jbd2__journal_start+0x38a/0x790
 jbd2_journal_start+0x19/0x20
 flush_stashed_error_work+0x110/0x2b3
 process_one_work+0x688/0x1080
 worker_thread+0x8b/0xc50
 kthread+0x26f/0x310
 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
 </TASK>
Modules linked in:
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Above issue may happen as follows:
      umount            read procfs            error_work
ext4_put_super
  flush_work(&sbi->s_error_work);

                      ext4_mb_seq_groups_show
	                ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp
			  ext4_mb_init_group
			    ext4_mb_init_cache
	                      ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait
			        ext4_validate_block_bitmap
				  ext4_error
			            ext4_handle_error
			              schedule_work(&EXT4_SB(sb)->s_error_work);

  ext4_unregister_sysfs(sb);
  jbd2_journal_destroy(sbi->s_journal);
    journal_kill_thread
      journal->j_flags |= JBD2_UNMOUNT;

                                          flush_stashed_error_work
				            jbd2_journal_start
					      start_this_handle
					        BUG_ON(journal->j_flags & JBD2_UNMOUNT);

To solve this issue, we call 'ext4_unregister_sysfs() before flushing
s_error_work in ext4_put_super().

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220322012419.725457-1-yebin10@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request May 9, 2022
[ Upstream commit b98535d ]

We got issue as follows:
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:389!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
CPU: 9 PID: 131 Comm: kworker/9:1 Not tainted 5.17.0-862.14.0.6.x86_64-00001-g23f87daf7d74-dirty torvalds#197
Workqueue: events flush_stashed_error_work
RIP: 0010:start_this_handle+0x41c/0x1160
RSP: 0018:ffff888106b47c20 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: ffffed10251b8400 RBX: ffff888128dc204c RCX: ffffffffb52972ac
RDX: 0000000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffff888128dc2050
RBP: 0000000000000039 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed10251b840a
R10: ffff888128dc204f R11: ffffed10251b8409 R12: ffff888116d78000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff888128dc2000
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88839d680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000001620068 CR3: 0000000376c0e000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 jbd2__journal_start+0x38a/0x790
 jbd2_journal_start+0x19/0x20
 flush_stashed_error_work+0x110/0x2b3
 process_one_work+0x688/0x1080
 worker_thread+0x8b/0xc50
 kthread+0x26f/0x310
 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
 </TASK>
Modules linked in:
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Above issue may happen as follows:
      umount            read procfs            error_work
ext4_put_super
  flush_work(&sbi->s_error_work);

                      ext4_mb_seq_groups_show
	                ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp
			  ext4_mb_init_group
			    ext4_mb_init_cache
	                      ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait
			        ext4_validate_block_bitmap
				  ext4_error
			            ext4_handle_error
			              schedule_work(&EXT4_SB(sb)->s_error_work);

  ext4_unregister_sysfs(sb);
  jbd2_journal_destroy(sbi->s_journal);
    journal_kill_thread
      journal->j_flags |= JBD2_UNMOUNT;

                                          flush_stashed_error_work
				            jbd2_journal_start
					      start_this_handle
					        BUG_ON(journal->j_flags & JBD2_UNMOUNT);

To solve this issue, we call 'ext4_unregister_sysfs() before flushing
s_error_work in ext4_put_super().

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220322012419.725457-1-yebin10@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
eyssartk pushed a commit to openhwgroup/linux that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2023
commit 4684709 upstream.

If kobject_init_and_add() fails, pci_slot_release() is called to delete
slot->list from parent->slots.  But slot->list hasn't been initialized
yet, so we dereference a NULL pointer:

  Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
00000000
  ...
  CPU: 10 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.4.240 torvalds#197
  task: ffffeb398a45ef10 task.stack: ffffeb398a470000
  PC is at __list_del_entry_valid+0x5c/0xb0
  LR is at pci_slot_release+0x84/0xe4
  ...
  __list_del_entry_valid+0x5c/0xb0
  pci_slot_release+0x84/0xe4
  kobject_put+0x184/0x1c4
  pci_create_slot+0x17c/0x1b4
  __pci_hp_initialize+0x68/0xa4
  pciehp_probe+0x1a4/0x2fc
  pcie_port_probe_service+0x58/0x84
  driver_probe_device+0x320/0x470

Initialize slot->list before calling kobject_init_and_add() to avoid this.

Fixes: 8a94644 ("PCI: Fix pci_create_slot() reference count leak")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1606876422-117457-1-git-send-email-zhongjubin@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Jubin Zhong <zhongjubin@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org	# v5.9+
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
1 participant