Adding BitBucket support

[KOLANICH]

Hello.
It will be very good to have BitBucket support added.

[michaelklishin]

Sorry, no immediate plans to do so.

[joshk]

Well, the full explanation is that we do have this on our radar but the changes would be very very extensive.

We don't have a timeline for this, nor even confirmation it will go ahead.

Thanks for logging the issue, but it is best to close it for now. Sorry.

[djc]

Can you elaborate on what the issues are? I might be interested into hacking on code around this. It seems like just pulling repositories from Bitbucket wouldn't be that hard. We could leave authentication to not-Github out of the picture for now.

[roidrage]

@djc indeed just adapting the checkout itself shouldn't be that hard. but we'll need support for Bitbuckets push payload and we need to have a way to synchronize a user's repositories and permissions to them, which is what Travis' user interface is built around. There's unfortunately a lot more involved than meets the eye, but if you're interested in hacking on that, by all means, go for it! :)

[djc]

Can you give an indication of what the relevant areas of the codebase are?

[svenfuchs]

travis-listener accepts events from Github and queues them up to rabbitmq. they are going to be picked up by apps that use service classes in travis-core.

i think a good start might be to look at travis-core and find occurrences of "Github" and "GH"

[Potherca]

I'd be interested in this too. I don't really have the time (or any experience with ruby) to contribute but maybe the good folks over at Atlassian could be persuaded to put some time into this as it would benefit their product (BitBucket) to. Sadly I don't really know anyone over there...

[rkh]

The bigger issue would be that we rely on GitHub completely for user management, access control etc. I think even if all the parts in the code base would be isolated, having a single instance that serves both GitHub and BitBucket. Though if the user management etc do get abstracted and reimplemented for BitBucket, I think it wouldn't be to hard to have a second instance running. I don't think Atlasssian would be interested in contributing to Travis CI, as they have their own proprietary alternative.

Long story short: We'd love this feature, but don't have the resources to add it.

[ssbarnea]

👍 ...for reconsidering this in the future.

[zconkle]

Would love to see support for bitbucket added. We use Jira and use bitbucket because it integrates heavily with the atlassian product suite. As an enterprise we are definitely open to a paid, hosted solution.

[jacobsvante]

Please do consider this. Github is only one of many DVCS services available.

[jplehmann]

+1

[ottsch]

+1