New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Sort input file list #5559
Sort input file list #5559
Conversation
04113cb
to
26e978b
Compare
WIP: I need to run another round of testing on this. |
Status Flag 'Pre-Test Inspection' - - This Pull Request Requires Inspection... The code must be inspected by a member of the Team before Testing/Merging |
@trilinos/framework I don't think the pull request tests have a way to test these changes. They look fine to me, but we would need reproduction instructions in order to evaluate them. |
My test looked good. One way to reproduce the original issue is to build on 2 different ext4 filesystems with dir_index enabled (is default on). This caused variations in search/variables_f.js files. |
Here is a snippet from a diff, but due to the random input, you will get different diffs. +++ new//usr/share/doc/packages/trilinos-doc/packages/xpetra/doc/html/search/variables_f.js 2019-07-05 12:00:00.000000000 +0000
@@ -1,6 +1,4 @@
var searchData=
[
- ['rangemaps_5f',['rangemaps_',['../classXpetra_1_1BlockedCrsMatrix.html#a20e4a341fac502c3d2c02c7a50d9c66b',1,'Xpetra::BlockedCrsMatrix']]],
- ['right_5fside',['RIGHT_SIDE',['/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/Trilinos-trilinos-release-12-10-1/packages/xpetra/doc/../../../packages/teuchos/doc/html/namespaceTeuchos.html#a4d69c405faef2b64ef0583adadcdbf91af01e44b3bfce7cb55b7537f0b1e23bde',1,'Teuchos']]],
- ['rowmap_5f',['rowMap_',['../classXpetra_1_1MatrixView.html#ab578ce61f1c75bb636b3431fd8390db1',1,'Xpetra::MatrixView']]]
+ ['thyramaps_5f',['thyraMaps_',['../classXpetra_1_1MapExtractor.html#a6c2728225e6db2f419856c5138be7ce7',1,'Xpetra::MapExtractor']]] |
E.g. seen in trilinos/Trilinos#5559
so that variables_f.js builds in a reproducible way in spite of indeterministic filesystem readdir order. See https://reproducible-builds.org/ for why this is good. Fixes trilinos#5559
5e77a89
to
d7ed884
Compare
so that variables_f.js builds in a reproducible way in spite of indeterministic filesystem readdir order. See https://reproducible-builds.org/ for why this is good. Fixes trilinos#5559
so that variables_f.js builds in a reproducible way in spite of indeterministic filesystem readdir order. See https://reproducible-builds.org/ for why this is good. Fixes trilinos#5559
Status Flag 'Pre-Test Inspection' - - This Pull Request Requires Inspection... The code must be inspected by a member of the Team before Testing/Merging |
I would still like to see this merged. Can I help anything more? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks harmless to me. Approving so testing can commence, though I realize this change won't actually be tested.
@mhoemmen, were you wanting documentation in the diff of this PR, or were @bmwiedemann's comments above sufficient? |
This looks ok, but I have to ask
|
Status Flag 'Pre-Test Inspection' - SUCCESS: The last commit to this Pull Request has been INSPECTED AND APPROVED by [ jmgate ]! |
Status Flag 'Pull Request AutoTester' - Testing Jenkins Projects: Pull Request Auto Testing STARTING (click to expand)Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_pullrequest_gcc_4.8.4
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_pullrequest_intel_17.0.1
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_pullrequest_gcc_4.9.3_SERIAL
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_pullrequest_gcc_7.2.0
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_pullrequest_cuda_9.2
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_pullrequest_python_2
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_pullrequest_python_3
Jenkins Parameters
Using Repos:
Pull Request Author: bmwiedemann |
Status Flag 'Pull Request AutoTester' - Jenkins Testing: all Jobs PASSED Pull Request Auto Testing has PASSED (click to expand)Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_pullrequest_gcc_4.8.4
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_pullrequest_intel_17.0.1
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_pullrequest_gcc_4.9.3_SERIAL
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_pullrequest_gcc_7.2.0
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_pullrequest_cuda_9.2
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_pullrequest_python_2
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_pullrequest_python_3
Jenkins Parameters
|
Status Flag 'Pre-Merge Inspection' - SUCCESS: The last commit to this Pull Request has been INSPECTED AND APPROVED by [ jmgate ]! |
Status Flag 'Pull Request AutoTester' - AutoMerge IS ENABLED, but the Label AT: AUTOMERGE is not set. Either set Label AT: AUTOMERGE or manually merge the PR... |
@trilinos/framework, who owns the |
Status Flag 'Pull Request AutoTester' - AutoMerge IS ENABLED, but the Label AT: AUTOMERGE is not set. Either set Label AT: AUTOMERGE or manually merge the PR... |
1 similar comment
Status Flag 'Pull Request AutoTester' - AutoMerge IS ENABLED, but the Label AT: AUTOMERGE is not set. Either set Label AT: AUTOMERGE or manually merge the PR... |
@jmgate It's all good, as long as y'all think this is harmless. Thanks! |
Status Flag 'Pull Request AutoTester' - AutoMerge IS ENABLED, but the Label AT: AUTOMERGE is not set. Either set Label AT: AUTOMERGE or manually merge the PR... |
1 similar comment
Status Flag 'Pull Request AutoTester' - AutoMerge IS ENABLED, but the Label AT: AUTOMERGE is not set. Either set Label AT: AUTOMERGE or manually merge the PR... |
@trilinos/
Sort input file list
so that variables_f.js builds in a reproducible way
in spite of indeterministic filesystem readdir order.
See https://reproducible-builds.org/ for why this is good.
This PR was done while working on reproducible builds for openSUSE.