Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[[Item] link auto-complete overwrites previously typed text #10

Closed
Lukahna opened this issue Nov 15, 2011 · 1 comment
Closed

[[Item] link auto-complete overwrites previously typed text #10

Lukahna opened this issue Nov 15, 2011 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@Lukahna
Copy link

Lukahna commented Nov 15, 2011

The chat [[Item] auto-complete feature almost always gets it wrong, making for a frustrating time trying to link an item by name.

For example, try typing [[Essence Of Air]. On typing the O, it will change to an M ("[[Essence Mango ", but the M will persist, even if more of the item is typed. Typing the full [[Essence Of Air results in [[Essence Mf Air

Other examples:

Crusader Orb -> Crusader Brb (Crusader Bow)
Abyss Crystal -> AbyssaCrystal (Abyssal Bag)
Greater Celestial Essence -> Greater Malestial Essence (Greater Magic Essence)

Even backspacing over the "incorrect" letters and retyping will result in the same mistake. The only way to work around this is to type the entire name (with the incorrect letters), and then use the left arrow, backspace, and replace the wrong letters, then go back to the end of line to type the final ].

The auto-complete should never force its guesses; further input from the user should overwrite any guessed letters.

Or at least, we need an option to turn auto-complete off.

@Veight
Copy link

Veight commented Apr 15, 2013

I noticed this, but I think it's more of an issue the addon isn't able to link those items? I dunno. It was doing the same for Golden Lotus it was forcing me to use golden rod.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants