TinyMQ - a diminutive, in-memory message queue
Pull request Compare This branch is even with slepher:master.
Fetching latest commit…
Cannot retrieve the latest commit at this time.
Failed to load latest commit information.


TinyMQ - A diminutive message queue

TinyMQ is a channel-based, in-memory message queue for Erlang. Channels are identified by strings (whatever you want) and are automatically created and destroyed as needed. Each channel is managed by a gen_server process. In theory the channel processes could reside on different nodes in an Erlang cluster, but for now they all reside on the node where TinyMQ is started.

Start the queue:

application:start(tinymq), % the max_age env variable defines the
                           % maximum age of messages, in seconds.
                           % defaults to 60.

Push a message to a channel:

tinymq:push("some-channel", <<"Hello, world!">>),

Check a channel for existing messages:

Timestamp = tinymq:now("some-channel"),    % Messages newer than this
{ok, NewTimestamp, Messages} = tinymq:poll("some-channel", Timestamp),

The Timestamp is important to the API design. By reusing the returned NewTimestamp you can be sure to receive all messages in a channel and no duplicates.

Besides polling a channel, it is also possible for processes to subscribe to a channel and receive any new message sent to it as soon as the message arrives:

                 now,     % The 'now' atom or a Timestamp
                 self()   % the process that will recieve the messages
    {_From, Timestamp, Messages} ->
        io:format("Received messages: ~p~n", [Messages])

Each channel can have an unlimited number of subscribers. Subscribers are removed from the channel as soon as the first message is delivered, so to keep a subscription active you need to keep re-subscribing using the returned Timestamp as the input to the next call.


Internally, messages are stored in a priority queue. Purging old messages occurs after any channel activity (but no more than once per second), and has an overhead of O(log(M) + E), where M is the total number of messages on a channel and E is the number of messages on a channel that expired since the last purge. With a better data structure this might be improved to O(log(M)), but note that the garbage collector will have to perform O(E) operations anyway, so the extra overhead is probably not worth losing sleep over.

Channels are destroyed after max_age seconds of inactivity. Because old messages are only purged when there is channel activity, some messages may linger in memory for up to 2 * max_age seconds (i.e. if the last channel activity occurs \epsilon seconds before a message is set to expire).

New messages on a channel are sent to all channel subscribers serially. With proper parallelism the running time might be improved to O(S/K), where S is the number of subscribers and K is the number of cores. But this will take some work.