New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Suggest CodePen along with JSBin. #24238

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Oct 4, 2017

Conversation

Projects
None yet
3 participants
@XhmikosR
Member

XhmikosR commented Oct 4, 2017

I'm using both but I personally find CodePen better. That being said, I think this is a fair addition.

PS. We could move the old jsbins to codepen if we want, but I'd rather have @mdo do that under his CodePen account.

@Johann-S

I prefer CodePen too 👍

@mdo

mdo approved these changes Oct 4, 2017

I still prefer JS Bin over CodePen for it's simpler interface and sharing, however, JS Bin has had a rough time staying ahead of perf and spam lately it seems. Let's leave both in there for now, please.

@XhmikosR XhmikosR merged commit 19aebb4 into v4-dev Oct 4, 2017

4 checks passed

bundlesize Good job! bundle size < maxSize
Details
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details
continuous-integration/travis-ci/push The Travis CI build passed
Details
hound No violations found. Woof!

@XhmikosR XhmikosR deleted the v4-dev-xmr-codepen branch Oct 4, 2017

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment