Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: support parsing satisfies operators #5717



Copy link

@sosukesuzuki sosukesuzuki commented Oct 2, 2022

PR Checklist


Based on #5716
Adds parsing support for satisfies operator.

Copy link

nx-cloud bot commented Oct 2, 2022

☁️ Nx Cloud Report

CI is running/has finished running commands for commit 5419dea. As they complete they will appear below. Click to see the status, the terminal output, and the build insights.

📂 See all runs for this branch

✅ Successfully ran 46 targets

Sent with 💌 from NxCloud.

Copy link

Thanks for the PR, @sosukesuzuki!

typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community.

The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately.

Thanks again!

🙏 Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently on As a thank you, your profile/company logo will be added to our main README which receives thousands of unique visitors per day.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Oct 2, 2022

Deploy Preview for typescript-eslint ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 5419dea
🔍 Latest deploy log
😎 Deploy Preview
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 2, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #5717 (94fbc45) into main (a40a311) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

❗ Current head 94fbc45 differs from pull request most recent head 5419dea. Consider uploading reports for the commit 5419dea to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #5717   +/-   ##
  Coverage   91.29%   91.29%           
  Files         366      366           
  Lines       12347    12348    +1     
  Branches     3610     3610           
+ Hits        11272    11273    +1     
  Misses        767      767           
  Partials      308      308           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittest 91.29% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
packages/visitor-keys/src/visitor-keys.ts 100.00% <ø> (ø)
packages/typescript-estree/src/convert.ts 97.89% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

package.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
package.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg marked this pull request as ready for review November 17, 2022 17:35
Copy link

@bradzacher bradzacher left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks for doing this!


For reference, changes I made prior to merging:

  • update babel packages so it supports the satisfies operator
  • converted the fixture test from a "shared fixtures" test to a new and shiny "ast-spec" test.
    • this is the preferred way of doing these ast tests going forward as we can more easily split them, compare with babel etc

@bradzacher bradzacher enabled auto-merge (squash) November 18, 2022 00:32
@bradzacher bradzacher merged commit 20d7cae into typescript-eslint:main Nov 18, 2022
@sosukesuzuki sosukesuzuki deleted the support-satisfies-operators branch November 20, 2022 04:30
omril1 pushed a commit to omril1/typescript-eslint that referenced this pull request Nov 23, 2022
Co-authored-by: Josh Goldberg <>
Co-authored-by: Brad Zacher <>
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 28, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
None yet
None yet

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants