Background
UCO has the ability to represent certain timestamps based on sources like file systems or other metadata fields (e.g. from email). (See #420.) PDFs contain their own specialized timestamp fields, but UCO has no way of representing them yet.
The PDF specification provides for these time stamps:
Requirements
Requirement 1
UCO must be able to represent the internally embedded creation time of a PDF file.
Requirement 2
UCO must be able to represent the internally embedded modification time of a PDF file.
Requirement 3
UCO must be able to represent the internally embedded access time of a PDF file.
Risk / Benefit analysis
Benefits
UCO would improve its timeline capabilities by representing these times.
Risks
There is a name pattern discrepancy between UCO's current observable:modifiedTime and observable:createdTime, versus the names in the specification. One name pattern must be selected, or the PDF specification should be deferred to.
Otherwise, this is an additive proposal.
Competencies demonstrated
Competency 1
Suppose a PDF is found to have both a creation and modification timestamp embedded.
Competency Question 1.1
Do the creation and modification time follow a sensible temporal ordering - modification occurs at or after creation time?
Ask for all PDF files in our knowledge base that have a creation time that comes definitively after the modification time.
SELECT ?nPdfFile
WHERE {
?nPdfFile
a uco-observable:PDFFile ;
uco-core:hasFacet ?nPdfFileFacet ;
.
?nPdfFileFacet
a uco-observable:PDFFileFacet ;
drafting:pdfCreatedDate ?lCrDate ;
drafting:pdfModDate ?lModDate ;
.
FILTER ( ?lCrDate > ?lModDate )
}
Result 1.1
Solution suggestion
To the observable:PDFFileFacet
- Add property
observable:pdfCreatedDate, cardinality 0..1, type xsd:dateTime.
- Add property
observable:pdfModDate, cardinality 0..1, type xsd:dateTime.
Coordination
Background
UCO has the ability to represent certain timestamps based on sources like file systems or other metadata fields (e.g. from email). (See #420.) PDFs contain their own specialized timestamp fields, but UCO has no way of representing them yet.
The PDF specification provides for these time stamps:
Requirements
Requirement 1
UCO must be able to represent the internally embedded creation time of a PDF file.
Requirement 2
UCO must be able to represent the internally embedded modification time of a PDF file.
Requirement 3
UCO must be able to represent the internally embedded access time of a PDF file.
Risk / Benefit analysis
Benefits
UCO would improve its timeline capabilities by representing these times.
Risks
There is a name pattern discrepancy between UCO's current
observable:modifiedTimeandobservable:createdTime, versus the names in the specification. One name pattern must be selected, or the PDF specification should be deferred to.Otherwise, this is an additive proposal.
Competencies demonstrated
Competency 1
Suppose a PDF is found to have both a creation and modification timestamp embedded.
Competency Question 1.1
Do the creation and modification time follow a sensible temporal ordering - modification occurs at or after creation time?
Ask for all PDF files in our knowledge base that have a creation time that comes definitively after the modification time.
Result 1.1
Solution suggestion
To the
observable:PDFFileFacetobservable:pdfCreatedDate, cardinality 0..1, typexsd:dateTime.observable:pdfModDate, cardinality 0..1, typexsd:dateTime.Coordination
develop