Minor nitpick in the Fuzzer class defenition

[hexagonrecursion]

The current code says:

# Note: the list comprehension below does not invoke self.run() for subclasses
# return [self.run(runner) for i in range(trials)]

The code uses this as a justification to use a loop instead of a list comprehension. This is incorrect: self.run() inside a list comprehension calls the correct subclass method just fine. Proof: https://mybinder.org/v2/gh/hexagonrecursion/fuzzingbook.git/proof?filepath=docs%2Fnotebooks%2FFuzzer-proof.ipynb

class Fuzzer(object):
    def __init__(self):
        pass

    def fuzz(self):
        """Return fuzz input"""
        return ""

    def run(self, runner=Runner()):
        """Run `runner` with fuzz input"""
        return runner.run(self.fuzz())

    def runs(self, runner=PrintRunner(), trials=10):
        """Run `runner` with fuzz input, `trials` times"""
        return [self.run(runner) for i in range(trials)]
    
        
class Foo(Fuzzer):
    def run(self, runner=Runner()):
        print('Foo.run')
        
Foo().runs()

Foo.run
Foo.run
Foo.run
Foo.run
Foo.run
Foo.run
Foo.run
Foo.run
Foo.run
Foo.run

[None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None]

[vrthra]

Hi @hexagonrecursion, can you explain the actual change? Is this simply to remove the note? The github diff doesn't know about Jupyter notebooks, and the diff it shows is incomprehensible.